Posted on 09/24/2006 8:35:26 AM PDT by World_Events
GARDEZ, Afghanistan After completing their deployment to this remote firebase, the Green Berets of ODA 2021 left for home covered in glory.
The 10-member Special Forces team, part of the Alabama National Guard, returned to their families in the spring of 2003 with tales to tell of frenzied firefights and narrow escapes.
ADVERTISEMENT Its commander had nominated each of his men as well as himself for medals for valor. The team's performance was heralded as evidence that the Guard could play as equals with the regular Army in the war on terrorism.
But the team also had come home with secrets.
Apparently unknown to Army officials, two detainees had died in the team's custody in separate incidents during the unit's final month in eastern Afghanistan. Several other detainees allege that they were badly beaten or tortured while held at the base in Gardez.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
"Apparently unknown to Army officials, two detainees had died in the team's custody in separate incidents during the unit's final month in eastern Afghanistan. Several other detainees allege that they were badly beaten or tortured while held at the base in Gardez."
Did the SF behead them with kitchen knives? Did the SF kill their wives and daughters with bombs laced with ball bearings while said daughters and wives were at the market? No? Then I could care less. The islamofascists need to reap what they sow.
The LA and NY Times are traitors to this country.
"Apparently unknown to Army officials, two detainees had died in the team's custody "
===
Crime me a river! Among other things, we don't even know whether they may have already been wounded and died of natural causes.
That's what they were there for, the KILL terrorists.
Remember Rumsfeld's answer a long time ago, when someone asked something what we are going to do with the terrorists, or something like that, and Rumsfeld simply said something like "we want to kill them".
It's WAR and these terrorists want to kill us and WILL kill us, unless we kill them first.
It would be news if a single islametard didn't claim he was beaten and tortured while in custody.
More allegations by our enemies that the MSM just eats with a spoon.
"It's WAR and these terrorists want to kill us and WILL kill us, unless we kill them first."
That should be on the moving lights sign in Times square for at least six months, or for the duration.
We'd better not fight a war we don't intend to win, and, to win, the methods may be no more honourable than the enemy's, however that may work out.
I am reading the long article in the LAT.
Clearly the liberals objective is to make us totally impotent in fighting the terrorists, and just be sitting ducks -- which was why we couldn't prevent 9-11. They want to not only go back to that but beyond, to make sure we can't have any effective means of fighting the terrorists and preventing attacks on the American people.
They want to have another attack, so they can blame it on President Bush. They are putting politics over the lives of Americans.
I am just reading the full article.
Now it appears they even want to abolish the Special Forces.
"Because of their clandestine nature, Special Forces operations have been a concern to some in Congress and the State Department who worry that human rights violations could be occurring under a cloak of secrecy"
Sounds like just grounds for a commendation to me. I'm not going to waste more time reading that commie LAT, but the only thing I could think is that they're gonna accuse them of goldbricking for not finishing off the torture/beatings with a good killing. But c'mon, these guys were at the end of a deployment and probably tired. People slip up sometimes.
Owl_Eagle
If what I just wrote made you sad or angry,
it was probably just a joke.
Instructions to claim torture is in the Al Qaeda Handbook.
Liberals rather believe Al Qaeda terrorists, than US military. Pathetic.
At the end of the article, they are even bashing the soldiers for getting mad, because the terrorists blew up some of their fellow soldiers, as if that were totally unreasonable, and they should just "turn the other cheek".
excerpt below:
====
"Staff Sgt. Mark "Marco" Deliz, a team engineer from Oneonta, Ala., tried to steer precisely through the tread marks carved by the two vehicles ahead. But his front right tire strayed a few inches and hit a land mine.
The explosion blew the truck 6 feet into the air, military reports said. Watching in horror from the vehicle behind, Waller could not imagine that anyone had survived.
Deliz determined that Barkalow was still alive and gestured for someone to radio for a helicopter. Staff Sgt. Philip S. Abdow, a junior medic who had joined the team six weeks earlier, wrapped what remained of Barkalow's right leg.
After the unnerving incident, the medic accompanied Barkalow on his helicopter evacuation. Abdow reportedly acted so frantically during the flight, barking orders and cursing, that the copter crew later complained to Special Operations officials.
By several accounts, the attack had a profoundly sobering effect on the team. Before the explosion, members had merely been frustrated by political constraints on their activities. Now they shared Barkalow's loss and some nursed an abiding grudge.
"You get mad when you see your buddies blown up," one team member said. "You stay pissed off about it."
Gee, could this vicious hit piece be the result of the murder/torture/beheadings/mutilation/draggings of two US soldiers by Iraqi 'insurgents' filmed and shown on the internet? Naturally, there's a quid pro quo and according to the LATimes and elitist PC thinkers the US got what it deserved. However, if their reporters suffered a similar fate, they'd be up in arms that they weren't adequately protected by US forces. The logic of this thinking is unfathomable.
Aha, the brass ring. Abolish Special Forces. Totally emasculate this country.
All Muslim's captured in battle should be executed. Period!
Shiite happens.
/johnny
Don't bother looking for logic inside the minds of liberals. They are pacifists in the midst of war... terribly and easily confused.
The LAT and NYT have but one objective: Weaken America. There are lots of reasons they think this way, but this article in the LAT is a result of hatred for the military. They will deny it, but then they'll print another piece like this. Neither the NYT nor the LAT ever miss an opportunity to urinate on the military.
They are scum and the enemy within and we should do everything we can to fight them.
More foder for the left-weenie "I don't support the President but I support the troops" people. They've been looking for an excuse to hate the troops as much as they hate the President. IMHO, of course.
Run by retards...
Read by retards.
'victim...an unarmed peasant' taken prisoner after a "fierce firefight"
This 'unarmed peasant' undoubtedly dropped his rife or RPG before being taken prisoner. No 'unarmed preasant' is going to stay around a 'fierce firefight' in the mountains just to watch the combatants go at each other.
But notice the emotion laden terms of the writer.
save
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.