[DoughtyOne]

I believe it was something like 70% in 1992. It actually made me question if women were bright enough to have the right to vote.

[bmwcyle]

It is time to point the finger at the problem before they vote Hillary into the White House.

[misterrob]

It was all about abortion on demand and what women felt is their right to have access to it.

That and their willingness to buy BS from a man with no conscience

[seekthetruth]

"I believe it was something like 70% in 1992. It actually made me question if women were bright enough to have the right to vote."

Me too, and I am a woman!

[scripter]

It actually made me question if women were bright enough to have the right to vote.

My wife said the same thing.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

I believe it was something like 70% in 1992.

Actually it was 52%.

[mjaneangels@aolcom]

"I believe it was something like 70% in 1992. It actually made me question if women were bright enough to have the right to vote."

All I can say is, I never voted for him.

I did vote against him though.

[citizensgratitude]

You maybe being sarcastic but I think we can only elect truly great leaders once we set criteria for voting.

What might be some of these criteria ?, IQ level, self-supporting status, tax paying persons, etc.?