Skip to comments.LIVE THREAD: Chris Wallace's interview with former President Bill Clinton ... FNC 6pm eastern
Posted on 09/24/2006 2:07:59 PM PDT by blogblogginaway
Thought it would be a good idea to discuss the upcoming interview where we already know Clinton loses it with Wallacae here. I for one am anxious to see it.
Clinton's just fund raising with this interview.
Fasten your seatbelt!
Watch Clinton's face when Wallace asks question #2.
It starts that early. Wallace asks about terrorists. That sets Clinton off for the next 14 minutes.
someone thought it was staged. I'm not watching, but I'd love to hear some opinions about that...
see the clips of this - that anger he has in his face - all I could keep thinking was "this was the face juanita broderick saw".
A QUESTION For Everybody...
If Bill really did order BL's assassination, wasn't he in violation of the prohibition against direct assassination enected by Ford and Carter, and upheld by Reagan????
Doesn't it apply EXCEPT in a time of war??
I don't remember Billy declaring War, do you???
Interview Quote"I authorized the CIA to get groups together to try to kill him."
In a section of the order labeled "Restrictions on Intelligence Activities," Ford outlawed political assassination: Section 5(g), entitled "Prohibition on Assassination," states: "No employee of the United States Government shall engage in, or conspire to engage in, political assassination."
Since 1976, every U.S. president has upheld Ford's prohibition on assassinations. In 1978 President Carter issued an executive order with the chief purpose of reshaping the intelligence structure. In Section 2-305 of that order, Carter reaffirmed the U.S. prohibition on assassination.
In 1981, President Reagan, through Executive Order 12333, reiterated the assassination prohibition. Reagan was the last president to address the topic of political assassination. Because no subsequent executive order or piece of legislation has repealed the prohibition, it remains in effect.
Saw it this morning. Clinton goes bananas.
I'll bet Fox doesn't cave in like ABC did.
he actually leans forward out of the chair - appearing to lunge at Wallace, but then "re-positions" himself in the seat.
I was wondering the same thing when I saw a clip of him saying he 'contracted' to have Bin Laden killed.
I guess I'm an inarticulate troglodyte. The only reaction I have to the clips I've seen of this mixup is to wanna punch that bastrid in the nose.
You are in for a treat.
He is out of control in this interview.
Yep. I've decided that clintoon set this up. Remember how his numbers would rise every time he portrayed hinself as a victim of the VRWC? Why did he agree to an interview with FOX, who he knows is going to ask him that question. He needed a way to strike out at his perceived enemies after his failure to stop ABC from "The Path to 9/11". He got it. Now let's see how this plays out. Keep an eye on hillary's numbers. Remember, clintoon does nothing without ulterior motives. Ever.
It's hell to try to save a legacy that doesn't exist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.