Skip to comments.
Benedict the Bombthrower:Why the pope's speech really was outrageous (Liberal view alert)
American Prospect ^
| 09/25/2006
| Adele Stan
Posted on 09/25/2006 9:45:57 AM PDT by SirLinksalot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: SirLinksalot
This is what happens when the author begins a logical process in media res. Not pretty, but it's good to know they still think they can dictate terms.
2
posted on
09/25/2006 9:47:52 AM PDT
by
BelegStrongbow
(www.stjosephssanford.org: Ecce Pactum, id cape aut id relinque)
To: SirLinksalot
Adele M. Stan is the author of the weblog, AddieStan.com, and the book, Debating Sexual Correctness. Ten to one says Adele M. Stan is a flaming poofter (or a screeching lezbo).
3
posted on
09/25/2006 9:48:16 AM PDT
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: SirLinksalot
Fact: Benedict mentioned that Islam has violent followers.
Fact: Islamists rioted burning churches and killed a nun
Conclusion: Islam sucks
4
posted on
09/25/2006 9:48:28 AM PDT
by
cardinal4
(Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi..)
To: SirLinksalot
Adele M. Stan is the author of the weblog, AddieStan.com, and the book, Debating Sexual Correctness.With credentials like this....
5
posted on
09/25/2006 9:48:56 AM PDT
by
frogjerk
(REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
To: SirLinksalot
Most of us thought that the Islamcist's reaction was really outrageous, so it makes perfect sense that the Libs would now claim that it's the Pope's comment that was outrageous.
6
posted on
09/25/2006 9:49:34 AM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: SirLinksalot
But to throw a rhetorical bomb such as that the pope tossed into the teeming cities of the Muslim world is to commit an act tantamount to violence. Liberal, pants-wetting traitors would rather brave men of truth remain silent than confront the evil in our world. May their chains rest lightly...
7
posted on
09/25/2006 9:50:36 AM PDT
by
pgyanke
(We can't share the blessings of peace with those for whom violence is holy imperative. -andy58-in-nh)
To: SirLinksalot
"But to throw a rhetorical bomb such as that the pope tossed into the teeming cities of the Muslim world is to commit an act tantamount to violence."
A rhetorical bomb? This author is out of his or her mind.
8
posted on
09/25/2006 9:52:03 AM PDT
by
Disturbin
To: SirLinksalot
I just smile when I see stuff like this. The authors are so clueless.
On the other hand, BXVI knows exactly what he's doing.
9
posted on
09/25/2006 9:52:17 AM PDT
by
BlessedBeGod
(Benedict XVI = Terminator IV)
To: SirLinksalot
Liberals think we should walk on egg-shells and enable islamofascists to continue with their infantile temper tantrums.
10
posted on
09/25/2006 9:53:17 AM PDT
by
Mogollon
To: SirLinksalot
What a completely stupid article! Words fail me!
(Not criticizing you at all. It's always good to be reminded how silly these people can be.)
11
posted on
09/25/2006 9:53:18 AM PDT
by
Mad Dawg
(Reality is not optional.)
To: SirLinksalot
But to throw a rhetorical bomb such as that the pope tossed into the teeming cities of the Muslim world is to commit an act tantamount to violence.This statement is tantamount to moronic stupidity. Either you can have dialog, or you cannot. Islamic Fundamentalism cannot. It must be vanquished.
12
posted on
09/25/2006 9:56:25 AM PDT
by
Paradox
(American Conservatives: Keeping the world safe for Liberalism.)
To: ArrogantBustard
I like the part where after listing her liberal and feminist qualifications (including writing for the "Village Voice") she concludes that:
She is in the midst of planning a second career as a lounge-singing ukulele-player.
13
posted on
09/25/2006 9:58:48 AM PDT
by
JimSEA
To: ArrogantBustard
Adele M. Stan is a journalist and editor whose work has appeared in The New Republic, the Village Voice, The Nation, The Advocate, Salon.com, the Washington Blade and Mother Jones magazine, as well as on the op-ed pages of the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the San Francisco Chronicle and the New York Daily News. She began her media career at Ms. magazine, where she served both on staff and as a contributing editor.
14
posted on
09/25/2006 9:59:25 AM PDT
by
UB355
(Slower traffic keep right)
To: SirLinksalot
The point of the piece is exactly of a mind with the Islamofascist view: that free speech that offends is violence, so it must be banned, or, alternatively, forcibly suppressed. If the libs keep rationalizing these attempts at suppression of free expression around the world, one day it'll be their expression that's being suppressed. How they can't fathom this reality, I can't understand.
15
posted on
09/25/2006 10:00:22 AM PDT
by
Emile
(New Orleans: Will the levees hold next time? Don't bet your life on it.)
To: SirLinksalot
"Add to these profound differences a recent history of Western colonial domination, the resulting economic domination by the West, as well as America's present assertion -- via bombs and occupation -- of Western ideals as universal and superior to all others, and the recipe for worldwide Muslim rage is complete."
Quick, somebody call the Whaamulance!
"Note the campaigns of King Charlemagne"
Typical lib- ever hear of the concept of 'self defense'?
What a wanker, drop him over Mecca sans parachute.
16
posted on
09/25/2006 10:00:39 AM PDT
by
RedStateRocker
(Nuke Mecca, Deport all illegals, abolish the IRS, ATF and DEA)
To: SirLinksalot
"Don't knock the leader of my religion"....its not nice...
17
posted on
09/25/2006 10:01:34 AM PDT
by
HarleyLady27
(My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
To: UB355
The Advocate, ... the Washington Blade ... Yep. She writes for Fag-mags and communist propaganda sheets, and got started at a radical feminist magazine. That's just got to increase the odds she's a man-hating feminazi lesbian.
18
posted on
09/25/2006 10:02:58 AM PDT
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: SirLinksalot
This is such an uninformed piece of nonsense it hardly deserves being refuted. But for one thing, Christianity itself never advocated spreading the word by the sword. Often, Christian princes took the faith and brought their people along, sometimes coercively, but the faith was never a military campaign. And the Crusades were not some unjustified raid against Islam, but in fact Christianity had flourished in the Levant for six-hundred years before Mohammed was even thought of. The crusaders only attempted to re-take the holy lands after the Muslims destroyed the shrines and barred pilgrims from visiting them, after having taken the sites by force over the prior centuries.
This liberal fascination with moral equivalence is simply laughable. We are truly in a "clash of civilizations". But it is not new. It has just been in remission, and is now regaining strength. We had better wake up to the fact, or we will soon face another Manzikert, but in our own lands.
To: SirLinksalot
WESTERN CULTURE IS SUPERIOR
20
posted on
09/25/2006 10:03:53 AM PDT
by
oldleft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson