Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic
Strangely, none of your replies to me have been directed to anyone else.

So? You jumped into the middle of the thread - I merely replied to your statements. My point was you are not the only one on the Evo side that is talking positions so all statements do not necessarily apply to you personally.

Since you don't seem to be able to say specifically what it is about my question you disagree with you disagree with

Which question are you talking about now?

BTW: how does one disagree with a question?

have you simply decided to irritate me as some kind of demonstration to everyone else?

Like I said - it is not all about you.

752 posted on 09/29/2006 11:20:50 AM PDT by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 751 | View Replies ]


To: Last Visible Dog

As far as I know the initial question I posed to you was settled equitably. The argument we have now is over my disagreeing with the author's statements and conclusions about Darwinism being "first and foremost a weapon against religion". You claim that you neither agree with nor support these statements, but insist on trying to tell me that I am wrong and that there does indeed exist sufficient evidence in the article to support those conclusions. This seems to be done simply to serve as a warning to anyone else who would have the termerity to express an opinion that it is not explicitly pro-Creationism.


762 posted on 09/29/2006 11:34:24 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 752 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson