Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Last Visible Dog
Please restate your position.

Why? Didn't you understand it well enough the first three or four times? We apparently have no disagreement over the content of the article.

You say you neither agree with nor support the statements made by the author that I am questioning. The only thing you I have done that you will not do, and seem to take issue with my doing is to challenge them publicly.

Your message is clear enough. Public criticism of pro-Creationist or anti-Evolution arguments will not be tolerated, even if those arguments are not objectively supportable. Even if you disagree with them privately, they must not be challenged publicly.

772 posted on 09/29/2006 12:03:03 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 767 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
Why? Didn't you understand it well enough the first three or four times? We apparently have no disagreement over the content of the article.

I have had enough of this nonsense - rather than state your position (whatever that might be), you find it necessary to ramble on with more tap-dancing.

Public criticism of pro-Creationist or anti-Evolution arguments will not be tolerated, even if those arguments are not objectively supportable.

You are really acting like a fool now. There is absolutely no basis for this nonsense and I challenge you to present supporting for your unsupported empty accusation. I am all but certain you are not up for the challenge.

775 posted on 09/29/2006 1:03:47 PM PDT by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 772 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson