Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Last Visible Dog
You are really acting like a fool now. There is absolutely no basis for this nonsense and I challenge you to present supporting for your unsupported empty accusation. I am all but certain you are not up for the challenge.

You have stated that you don't agree with or support the author's statements that I have questioned. Tell us why you believe the author of this article is wrong.

779 posted on 09/29/2006 1:18:17 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 775 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
You have stated that you don't agree with or support the author's statements that I have questioned. Tell us why you believe the author of this article is wrong.

That is a rather interesting question? I have taken no position on the article therefore you demand I take a position? You definitely operate on bizarre logic.

Whatever. I will play your game

I see no evidence to support this claim by Wells: "The truth is Darwinism is not a scientific theory, but a materialistic creation myth masquerading as science. It is first and foremost a weapon against religion – especially traditional Christianity."

I would like to see valid objections to the content of the article - I think personal attacks on Wells are silly and claims that the article is full of lies without presenting any evidence are pointless.

Now I answered your question - are you going to state your position.

781 posted on 09/29/2006 1:28:31 PM PDT by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 779 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson