Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Malkin: Who is Paul Pillar? (NYT Anonymous Leaker on NIE ID'd as ex-CIA official?)
MichelleMalkin.com ^ | 9-27-06 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 09/28/2006 5:37:11 AM PDT by cgk

Who is Paul Pillar?

By Michelle Malkin

  ·   September 27, 2006 11:14 AM

pillar.jpg
Drip, drip, drip?

In its original report leaking details of the National Intelligence Estimate on the Iraq war, the New York Times relied on anonymous, unnamed leakers to spin its contents and embarrass the White House.

Today, the Times includes comments from some named sources. Pay attention to this one:

What was most remarkable about the intelligence estimate, several experts said, was the unremarkable nature of its conclusions.

“At one level it is unsurprising stuff,’’ said Paul Pillar, who was the national intelligence officer for the Near East and South Asia on the intelligence council until last year. “But there is definitely much there that you haven’t heard the president say,’’ he added, “including the role that Iraq has played’’ in inspiring disaffected Muslims to join an anti-American jihadist movement.

Tim Sumner at Stop the NYTimes has some pointed questions about Pillar:

How does Paul Pillar know “there is definitely much there [in the NIE] that you haven’t heard the president say” unless he has seen the entire NIE or the parts of it that where not declassified and published yesterday? Which leads us back to what the Times’ Mark Mazzetti wrote (or his editors inserted) in the last paragraph of their original report this past Sunday:

More recently, the Council on Global Terrorism, an independent research group of respected terrorism experts, assigned a grade of “D+” to United States efforts over the past five years to combat Islamic extremism. The council concluded that “there is every sign that radicalization in the Muslim world is spreading rather than shrinking.”

Paul Pillar is one of eight members of the Council on Global Terrorism.

Was Paul Pillar one of those who officials or experts who “had either seen the final version of the document or participated in the creation of earlier drafts” and one of the unnamed sources for the Times’ Spy Agencies Say Iraq War Worsens Terrorism Threat? We do not know the answer to that question yet we think the New York Times has provided the FBI with good reason to start their investigation of who leaked the classified NIE with him.

The blogosphere has some interesting background on Pillar.

Dinocrat had a useful overview of Pillar's writings in 2004 and concludes:

Paul Pillar has a career interest and preference for negotiations as the way to solve conflicts. From his earliest book, he focused on situations where the outcome was not victory. Time and again, he has said that military solutions are not solutions. With regard to Iraq, whether it goes well or poorly, it goes poorly — if terrorism is the question. Clearly Mr. Pillar is not on board with George Bush’s fundamental premises in the Global War on Terror, so it should be no surprise that he is having secret meetings around the country criticizing US policy. Why does this fellow have a job at the CIA?

Dinocrat followed up with this on Sept. 28, 2004: "Is CIA employee Paul Pillar Leaking Elements of a Secret Report on Iraq to the New York Times?"

Paul Pillar is a CIA employee, and member of the National Intelligence Council. He is opposed to major elements of President Bush’s strategy in the Global War on Terror, as we have previously detailed.

Two days ago, Robert Novak had a column about Pillar’s disclosure of the secret material to a West Coast dinner of private citizens:

[T]he analyst who identified himself as its author told a private dinner last week of secret, unheeded warnings years ago about going to war in Iraq. This exchange leads to the unavoidable conclusion that the president of the United States and the Central Intelligence Agency are at war with each other.

Paul R. Pillar, the CIA’s national intelligence officer for the Near East and South Asia, sat down Tuesday night in a large West Coast city with a select group of private citizens. He was not talking off the cuff. Relying on a multi-paged, single-spaced memorandum, Pillar said he and his colleagues concluded early in the Bush administration that military intervention in Iraq would intensify anti-American hostility throughout Islam.

The reporting in the New York Times is based on the same report as the material disclosed by Mr. Pillar previously:

A classified National Intelligence Estimate prepared for President Bush in late July spells out a dark assessment of prospects for Iraq, government officials said Wednesday.

The estimate outlines three possibilities for Iraq through the end of 2005, with the worst case being developments that could lead to civil war, the officials said. The most favorable outcome described is an Iraq whose stability would remain tenuous in political, economic and security terms.

“There’s a significant amount of pessimism,” said one government official who has read the document, which runs about 50 pages. The officials declined to discuss the key judgments - concise, carefully written statements of intelligence analysts’ conclusions - included in the document. The intelligence estimate, the first on Iraq since October 2002, was prepared by the National Intelligence Council and was approved by the National Foreign Intelligence Board.

The Times article carefully skirts the issue of whether the Times has a copy of the report, though the Times does not deny that it had been given a copy, nor does it disclose whether it has been allowed to review the memorandum by Pillar and the National Intelligence Council.

Maybe I missed something along the way, but isn’t leaking secret information illegal? If Pillar is the leaker, here are a couple of questions: Why is this behavior tolerated among active CIA employees? How come this fellow is not being prosecuted? Why does he still have a job handling secrets at the CIA?

This sounds like an awfully familiar M.O., don't you think?

Earlier this year, Pillar made a splash with this Foreign Affairs article, which argued:

During the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, writes the intelligence community's former senior analyst for the Middle East, the Bush administration disregarded the community's expertise, politicized the intelligence process, and selected unrepresentative raw intelligence to make its public case.

The Washington Post profiled Pillar here. See this excellent response from Bruised Orange.

Guillermo Christensen, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations who served for 15 years as a CIA intelligence officer, responded to Pillar in the WSJ:

CIA officers on the cusp of retirement often enroll in a seminar that is supposed to help them adjust to life after the agency--teaching them, for example, how to write a resumé. I've begun to wonder if part of that program now includes a writing seminar on how to beat up on the Bush administration. The latest such blast comes from Paul Pillar, who, over the course of his long career, was arguably a central player in the CIA's analysis of the Middle East, in particular Iraq. But now Mr. Pillar has decided to disclose to the world, in a recent article in Foreign Affairs, that he thought all along that the war was a bad idea, and that the president and his advisers ignored his intelligence.

Why Mr. Pillar would even attempt to argue that the White House ignored the CIA's intelligence is beyond me--as innumerable investigations have demonstrated, all of the "intelligence" within his responsibility was 100% in agreement that Iraq posed a serious danger and that it had an active program for acquiring WMD. Over the course of a decade and a half, and thousands of pages of intelligence analysis, it is hard to think of anyone in the government who was more directly involved in reaching the wrong conclusions about what was going on in Iraq than Mr. Pillar himself.

And note this:

Paul Pillar was right in the thick of the process and substance that reached those conclusions. Had he actually written a warning to the administration against going to war before the war, his conclusions could not have rested on any of the CIA's intelligence analysis, but instead on his own political views against the administration--something which he has made no bones about in discussions with think-tank audiences long before he left the agency. This, incidentally, is prohibited behavior according to the professional practices of the CIA, the equivalent of betraying attorney-client confidentiality.

Not merely content to have played a leading role in the Iraq intelligence failure, Mr. Pillar is now following in the footsteps of others like Michael Scheuer, in undermining whatever credibility and access the CIA still may have with policymakers. By violating his confidences, Mr. Pillar is ensuring that those who succeed him--those who are, I hope, trying to fix the many problems facing the CIA--will be even less likely to see any real impact from their work because the president and his advisers will be loath to trust them.

For decades, there has been a common understanding that CIA analysts play a role roughly analogous, for policymakers, to experts whose opinions are sought in confidence, such as lawyers or accountants. Presidents and their advisers have felt comfortable in relying on analysts, in theory at least, for unbiased information and conclusions--and for keeping their mouths shut about what they learn. Presidents, secretaries of state, and others have given the CIA access into the inner sanctum of policymaking in the belief that the CIA would not use the media or leaks to influence the outcome.

For a CIA officer to discard this neutral role and to inject himself in the political realm is plain wrong. It will end up making the CIA even less relevant than it is today--if that is possible.

Paul Mirengoff at Power Line was a college roommate of Pillar's.

Thomas Joscelyn eviscerates Pillar's terrorism credentials in a piece highlighting the MSM's unquestioning treatment of Pillar.

See also Stephen Hayes: Paul Pillar speaks again.

And Robert Novak: Is the CIA at war with Bush?

And: White House-CIA breach

And from 9/29/04: WSJ on the CIA's insurgency

Note especially this paragraph, which applies as much today as it did almost exactly two years ago:

Keep in mind that none of these CIA officials were ever elected to anything, and that they are employed to provide accurate information to officials who present their policy choices for voter judgment. Yet what the CIA insurgents are essentially doing here, with their leaks and insubordination, is engaging in a policy debate. Given the timing of the latest leaks so close to an election, they are now clearly trying to defeat President Bush and elect John Kerry. Yet somehow the White House stands accused of “politicizing” intelligence?

Old habits die hard, methinks.

***

Watch: Today's related Vent on Democrat monkey business.

More background from Clarice Feldman posted 2/10/06 at The American Thinker:

Pillar was the top analyst at the CounterTerrorismCenter for most of the 1990s. In April 2001, he published a book, Terrorism and U.S. Foreign Policy (published by the Brookings Institution). In this book he argued that weapons of mass destruction were less likely to pose a threat than more conventional threats, that terrorism would not ever go away, and that we should work instead to contain it.

He opposed tough approaches to terrorism as too simplistic, arguing for international cooperation and diplomacy. He obviously would be a man more comfortable with John Kerry or any other Democrat in the White House than he would be with the President America twice elected.

Pillar has long been a front line warrior in the CIA’s war on President Bush.



Thomas Lifson at AT weighs in today:

We have long known that a cadre of professionals in the CIA opposes the President’s policies, and we have seen that they are willing to leak cherrypicked intelligence to undermine support for President Bush.

So far there is no conclusive evidence of Pillar’s personal culpability in the disposition of top secret information, which is a crime I must assume. But he puts a human face on the sort of CIA official who might well strongly oppose the President.

Peter Mulhern in an AT article today laments the sorry history of our elite experts getting it wrong. The CIA mandarinate thought there was no winning the Cold War, and focused on getting the best deal out of detente. Pillar worked his way up through this organization.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cia; clintoncell; malkin; mcgovern; nieleak; nytimes; paulpillar; pillar; raymcgovern; vips
Another "official" with an axe to grind?


1 posted on 09/28/2006 5:37:13 AM PDT by cgk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2dogjoe; 351 Cleveland; 4Freedom; ajolympian2004; alisasny; AmericanMade1776; askrenr; at bay; ...

Malkin ping!

Please FReepmail me if you would like to be added to, or removed from, the Michelle Malkin ping list...

2 posted on 09/28/2006 5:38:14 AM PDT by cgk (I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Malkin ping!


3 posted on 09/28/2006 5:38:48 AM PDT by cgk (I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

Interesting read, thanks for posting.


4 posted on 09/28/2006 5:40:13 AM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

I wish the CIA would return to the old standard of taking care of these traitors.


5 posted on 09/28/2006 5:41:29 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

And yet many are willing to let traitors to this country take over Congress this fall.


6 posted on 09/28/2006 5:44:53 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk
You gotta be making big bucks to afford a house in Great Falls, VA. DC-area house sales and assessments
7 posted on 09/28/2006 5:48:59 AM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk
When I was in the Community there were always dissenting views to a majority assessment like the NIE-

Decisionmakers were always presented with the positions as reasoned out by all sides who presented their recommendations.

But at the desk of the POTUS- the buck stops and he makes the decision which way to proceed.

If we Americans don't like his decisions, then we go to our polling places on 2 November every 4 years and overthrow him.

Bush has always chosen the course of action most likely to secure the US against future 9-11 or greater catastrophes.

Clinton always chose the course of action most likely to not make waves so he would get re-elected.

Funny, but before 2001, I do not remember this huge industry of think tanks, publishers and talking head shows created to fund a comfortable retirement and aura "professional expertness" to those who held minority Intel Community views (usually failed views rejected time and time again over two previous administrations).
8 posted on 09/28/2006 5:51:57 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

9 posted on 09/28/2006 5:58:47 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk; All

Rope + Tall Oak = One less Anti-American Dweeb.


10 posted on 09/28/2006 5:59:19 AM PDT by thelastvirgil (Incumbent politicians: PUBLIC ENEMY NUMBER ONE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk
Lorie Byrd's doing the job MSM is supposed to do.
11 posted on 09/28/2006 6:03:11 AM PDT by sono ("Islamís borders are bloody and so are its innards." Samuel Huntington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Why hasn't the DOJ & the Whitehouse convicted any of these leakers? It is beyond the time the DOJ sends the responsible persons to jail for 10 years for each instance of leaking classified info. (as the law states)

Until they get tough and find some of these people, I find it hard to feel sorry for any of the damage that has been done.

1st time... lesson learned
2nd time... call me stupid
3rd time... call me really stupid
4th time... call me really really stupid
5th time... call me irresponsible


12 posted on 09/28/2006 6:04:16 AM PDT by musikman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: musikman

I'm waiting for one of these leakers to be arrested.

still waiting....



snore...


13 posted on 09/28/2006 6:08:12 AM PDT by Loud Mime (An undefeated enemy is still an enemy.......war has a purpose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

It's just NUTZ ! All it will take is for one or two to be prosecuted and the problem will end.

What is Speedy Gonzales doing?

This problem keeps resurfacing like one of Clintons rashes and I'm getting sick of GWB crying about the leaking in Washington. Find out who's doing it. They are criminals - treat them as such.


14 posted on 09/28/2006 6:13:05 AM PDT by musikman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dog; Howlin; Miss Marple

FYI


15 posted on 09/28/2006 6:23:08 AM PDT by Carolinamom ("I don't have time to be fingerpointing." ---President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: musikman
Find out who's doing it. They are criminals - treat them as such.

Ditto! Whoever the leaker is, whether it be this twit or someone else, they need to do hard time!

16 posted on 09/28/2006 6:25:53 AM PDT by JaguarXKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cgk

Soooo...the bottom line of all of this (excellent) info is that Pillar was up to his neck in the failed anti-terrorism policies of the 90's? go figure...


17 posted on 09/28/2006 6:33:02 AM PDT by 13Sisters76 ("It is amazing how many people mistake a certain hip snideness for sophistication. " Thos. Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

When the government of the United States refuses to investigate, indict, and convict leakers of national security information, then private citizens need to act!
This treasonous rat Pillar needs an anal probe!


18 posted on 09/28/2006 6:38:53 AM PDT by Doc Savage (Bueller?....Bueller?...Bueller?...Bueller?...Pelosi?...Pelosi?...Pelosi?...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage

.....he'd probably enjoy it.


19 posted on 09/28/2006 6:39:49 AM PDT by Loud Mime (An undefeated enemy is still an enemy.......war has a purpose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cgk

BTT - The war within!


20 posted on 09/28/2006 7:12:59 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk
...Pillar’s disclosure of the secret material to a West Coast dinner of private citizens...

WTH? This guy should have been pegged as completely untrustworthy long, long ago.

21 posted on 09/28/2006 7:23:25 AM PDT by shezza (God bless our military heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk
Shouldn't the CIA be putting this guy in the hot seat. Then charging him with sedition if he according to this article is leaking Intelligence information.
Undoubtedly he is a "Progressive Marxist liberal" in a sea of patriots.
22 posted on 09/28/2006 7:31:16 AM PDT by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

Don't they execute traitors? I mean we charged Tokyo Rose with treason.


23 posted on 09/28/2006 7:37:36 AM PDT by Dominick ("Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought." - JP II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

--The CIA mandarinate thought there was no winning the Cold War, and focused on getting the best deal out of detente--

Theoretically that was true. There was no way a decadent, dissolute, militarily weak West could have triumphed over a militarily powerful, united and highly organized Soviet Union and its loyal allies in the Warsaw Treaty Organization. Some conservatives like to say it was Reagan's relatively modest arms buildup in the 1980s that push the Soviet Union over the edge. But in terms of real dollars, the 1950-1965 build up was far greater, and the Soviets took that in stride. Let's not forget the German invasion in June 1941 was far more catastrophic, yet the USSR not only survived, but marched to the greatest victory in Russian history. I suspect the collapse of the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact is one of those odd topics that will have historians arguing and scratching their heads for hundreds of years. I wonder sometimes if God himself simply had enough with the USSR and "smote it" the way he "smote" Sodom and Gomorrah, or Pharonic Egypt when it treated the Hebrews badly.


24 posted on 09/28/2006 7:57:55 AM PDT by katyusha (Those who fail history are doomed to go to summer school)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

Bump


25 posted on 09/28/2006 8:14:23 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cgk

Bush should appoint Michelle Malkin to broom out the CIA and the FBI. Two key jobs that he continues to neglect.

A smart POTUS wants advisers with different backgrounds and views, so he doesn't just hear what he wants to hear. But it's essential that all of these people should be loyal to their country and their elected president. If not, then they should resign.

There's nothing wrong with Pillar arguing the other side in internal meetings. But he appears to be part of the rogue faction in the CIA who have worked hard to depose our President. They all should have been quietly retired from office long since. This nutjob should not be in charge of an important arm of the CIA in the WOT, as he appears to be.


26 posted on 09/28/2006 10:42:31 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

The Paul Pillar quote in your picture is reminiscent of Joe Wilson’s “intelligence” trip to Niger. In both cases it shows their unbridled arrogance.

While the President gets information and intelligence from thousands of sources, both Joe Wilson and Paul Pillar seem to believe that if the President doesn’t embrace their opinions and react exactly the way they would like, it’s fraudulent or worse.

These guys need to get a grip. It is the President, not them, who was elected in a national vote to lead the United States. As the head of the executive branch of our government it’s the President’s judgment and opinion that counts, not that of these ankle biting underlings.


27 posted on 09/28/2006 12:17:52 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa; the Real fifi
Ping.

Larry Everest, "Ray McGovern: Catching Rumsfeld the Liar Red-Handed—and on National TV"

Larry Everest: Why did you decide to focus on the question of Rumsfeld’s lies about the war?

Ray McGovern: That day I was surfing the web and noticed that my former colleague, recently retired Paul Pillar, had referred in an interview to the “campaign of manipulation of intelligence” that tried to create out of whole cloth ties between Iraq and al Qaeda. Until he retired late last year, Pillar was the most senior analyst/manager for the Middle East; now he is speaking out.

28 posted on 09/28/2006 12:25:47 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

If a couple of these t#rds were taken out and shot, the leaking would stop.


29 posted on 09/28/2006 12:29:49 PM PDT by Antoninus (I don't vote for liberals, regardless of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

I'm for shutting down and closing out the analyst side of the CIA and the Near East Bureau (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Saudis) and see if that works.In any event, given what is churned out in those places, it can't hurt the war effort.


30 posted on 09/28/2006 1:17:31 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cgk

bttt


31 posted on 09/28/2006 2:05:45 PM PDT by jackv (just shakin' my head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

Sounds like Paul Pillar is auditioning to be either the head of CIA or the NSC in the next Democrat Administration. I hope he gets REALLY old waiting for that opportunity. ;o)


32 posted on 09/28/2006 5:54:09 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

I need to come back to this. A LOT of info to digest.


33 posted on 09/29/2006 4:20:46 AM PDT by NEPA (You say redneck like its a bad thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

The LameStreamMedia is in journalistic kindergarten compared to Michelle. Great post.


34 posted on 10/07/2006 12:40:32 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson