Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton’s Selective Amnesia
The American Thinker ^ | October 2, 2006 | Noel Sheppard

Posted on 10/02/2006 6:08:12 AM PDT by Quilla


Did you see Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) suggest last week what her husband would have done if he had received the August 6, 2001, Presidential Daily Brief concerning bin Laden? Touching, wasn’t it? If only there was an ounce of truth to it.

To refresh everyone’s memory, after former president Bill Clinton’s meltdown during an interview with Chris Wallace on September 24, the junior senator from New York felt compelled to come to his rescue:

I’m certain that if my husband and his national security team had been shown a classified report entitled `Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside United States,’ he would have taken it more seriously than history suggests it was taken by our current president and his national security team,” Hillary Clinton said. [emphasis added]

What Mrs. Clinton was referring to was the now infamous PDB  that the left have claimed for years was ignored by the Bush administration in the days just prior to the 9/11 attacks. True to form, and likely to be expected, the junior senator was once again exhibiting the famous Clinton selective amnesia, a trait that apparently doesn’t require genetic transmission.

As previously identified by the American Thinker the following comes from page 128 of the 9/11 Commission report:

On Friday, December 4, 1998, the CIA included an article in the Presidential Daily Brief describing intelligence, received from a friendly government, about a threatened hijacking in the United States. This article was declassified at our request.

This is the actual article from the PDB in question:

The following is the text of an item from the Presidential Daily Brief received by President William J. Clinton on December 4, 1998. Redacted material is indicated in brackets.

SUBJECT: Bin Ladin Preparing to Hijack US Aircraft and OtherAttacks

1. Reporting [—] suggests Bin Ladin and his allies are preparing forattacks in the US, including an aircraft hijacking to obtain the release ofShaykh ‘Umar ‘Abd al-Rahman, Ramzi Yousef, and Muhammad Sadiq‘Awda. One source quoted a senior member of the Gama’at al-Islamiyya (IG) saying that, as of late October, the IG had completed planning for an operation in the US on behalf of Bin Ladin, but that the operation was on hold. A senior Bin Ladin operative from Saudi Arabia was to visit IG counterparts in the US soon thereafter to discuss options—perhaps including an aircraft hijacking.

• IG leader Islambuli in late September was planning to hijack aUS airliner during the “next couple of weeks” to free ‘Abd al-Rahman and the other prisoners, according to what may be adifferent source.

• The same source late last month said that Bin Ladin mightimplement plans to hijack US aircraft before the beginning ofRamadan on 20 December and that two members of the operationalteam had evaded security checks during a recent trialrun at an unidentified New York airport. [—]

2. Some members of the Bin Ladin network have received hijack training, according to various sources, but no group directly tied to Bin Ladin’s al-Qa’ida organization has ever carried out an aircraft hijacking. Bin Ladin could be weighing other types of operations against US aircraft. According to [—] the IG in October obtained SA-7 missiles and intended to move them from Yemen into Saudi Arabia to shoot down an Egyptian plane or, if unsuccessful, a US military or civilian aircraft.

• A [—] in October told us that unspecified “extremist elements”in Yemen had acquired SA-7s. [—]

3. [—] indicate the Bin Ladin organization or its allies are moving closerto implementing anti-US attacks at unspecified locations, but we do notknow whether they are related to attacks on aircraft. A Bin Ladin associate in Sudan late last month told a colleague in Kandahar that he had shipped a group of containers to Afghanistan. Bin Ladin associates also talked about the movement of containers to Afghanistan before the East Africa bombings.

• In other [—] Bin Ladin associates last month discussed pickingup a package in Malaysia. One told his colleague in Malaysiathat “they” were in the “ninth month [of pregnancy].”

• An alleged Bin Ladin supporter in Yemen late last monthremarked to his mother that he planned to work in “commerce”from abroad and said his impending “marriage,” whichwould take place soon, would be a “surprise.”“Commerce” and“marriage” often are codewords for terrorist attacks. [—]

Somehow this little piece of history slipped the Senator’s mind. Maybe more importantly, the information contained in this Brief was far more detailed than anything in the August 6, 2001 memo to President Bush, which was largely an update concerning bin Laden and al Qaeda’s activities since the August 1998 U.S. embassy attacks in Africa.

In fact, and almost comically, some of the information in the Bush PDB came right out of the Clinton one:

We have not been able to corroborate some of the more sensational threat reporting, such as that from a——service in 1998 saying that Bin Laden wanted to hijack a U.S. aircraft to gain the release of “Blind Sheikh” Omar Abdel Rahman and other U.S.-held extremists.

Sound familiar? Apparently, it didn’t to the junior Senator from New York, even though some of the information that Mrs. Clinton complained President Bush didn’t act on was actually more than two and a half years old, and was originally presented to her husband when he was Commander-in-Chief. 

Ah, the wonders of selective amnesia.

Yet, what also eluded the memory of supposedly the most intelligent woman in America was that unlike what was available to the Bush administration and the intelligence community in August 2001 – i.e. no information about bin Laden’s whereabouts – the CIA new exactly where the the terrorist leader was just sixteen days after Clinton received his PDB. The following is from pages 130 and 131 of the Report:

On December 20, intelligence indicated Bin Ladin would be spending the night at the Haji Habash house, part of the governor’s residence in Kandahar. The chief of the Bin Ladin unit, “Mike,” told us that he promptly briefed Tenet and his deputy, John Gordon. From the field, the CIA’s Gary Schroen advised: “Hit him tonight—we may not get another chance.” An urgent teleconference of principals was arranged.

The principals considered a cruise missile strike to try to kill Bin Ladin. One issue they discussed was the potential collateral damage—the number of innocent bystanders who would be killed or wounded. General Zinni predicted a number well over 200 and was concerned about damage to a nearby mosque.

Unfortunatley, this mission – like others before it – never occurred. As a result, according to the Report, “Mike” – who we now know to actually be Michael Scheuer  – couldn’t sleep that night:

“I’m sure we’ll regret not acting last night,” he wrote, criticizing the principals for “worrying that some stray shrapnel might hit the Habash mosque and ‘offend’ Muslims.”

Regret it indeed, for when you add it all up, on December 4, 1998, President Clinton received a written warning of an al Qaeda plot to hijack American planes. Sixteen days later, the CIA believed it knew of bin Laden’s whereabouts in Kandahar, and had a plan to take him out. The last time there was such a plan, for some reason it was aborted, and within months, two U.S. embassies were bombed in Africa.

Yet, despite this deadly precedent for inaction, just four months later, with a PDB warning of new attacks imminent from this same enemy, a plan to kill Osama bin Laden was once again scuttled, this time seemingly due to the risks to civilians and holy religious structures in the area.

What this rather convincingly proves is that despite protestations to the contrary, the Clinton administration was more concerned with the politics of the Middle East than in preventing the loss of American lives. And, both he and his wife today are shamefully more intrested in protecting his legacy and her political future than being honest with the American people about national security issues.

What’s new?

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911; binladen; bj; bjclinton; blindambition; clinton; clintonistas; incompetent; nationaldisgrace; pathto911; pressprostitute; shoplifter; socialists; trailertrash; whatdidhillaryknow; whileclintonslept; whokilledfoster; wot
Selective amnesia or deliberate lie? /rhetorical
1 posted on 10/02/2006 6:08:14 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Quilla

Hey, wasn't she "co-president"? Why can't we include her in the "blame game" since she failed to get OBL, too?

2 posted on 10/02/2006 6:11:00 AM PDT by goresalooza (Nurses Rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T


3 posted on 10/02/2006 6:15:30 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Treaty Fetishism: "[The] belief that a piece of paper will alter the behavior of thugs." R. Lowry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Miss Marple; Peach; kcvl; AliVeritas; All

FYI....Mike Scheuer knew first hand what he was talking about w/Chris Wallace.

4 posted on 10/02/2006 6:17:59 AM PDT by Carolinamom ("I don't have time to be fingerpointing." ---President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom

This woman makes my skin crawl.

5 posted on 10/02/2006 6:28:52 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

thanx. excellent. this will help with a piece in the works.... :)

6 posted on 10/02/2006 6:31:18 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Same here, Eric.

7 posted on 10/02/2006 6:31:42 AM PDT by Carolinamom ("I don't have time to be fingerpointing." ---President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded; Quilla; All
A virtual kill of bin Laden seems apt. One should never expect more of bill clinton. And there is a certain symmetry, a perfect parry for clinton's 'virtual obsession.'



8 posted on 10/02/2006 6:32:37 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

Why did it bother me when she said, "my husband" instead of ...Bill? That made the hairs on the back of my neck stand up.

9 posted on 10/02/2006 6:38:30 AM PDT by shiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

There are two great examples in this story: What happens when you ask a Democrat tough questions and what happens when you don't.

10 posted on 10/02/2006 6:38:53 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (I gigged your peace frog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RacerF150

He lies and she retreats into the hypothetical. As Friday always said, "The facts mam, just the facts."

11 posted on 10/02/2006 7:06:57 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Link to FNS/Wallace counter video in post #11 on this thread:

Transcript: Counterterror Experts Debate Clinton Claims on 'FNS'
  Posted by windchime
On 10/02/2006 4:08:18 AM CDT · 46 replies · 1,385+ views

Fox News ^ | October 1, 2006 | Fox News
The following is a partial transcript of the Oct. 1, 2006, edition of "FOX News Sunday With Chris Wallace": "FOX NEWS SUNDAY" HOST CHRIS WALLACE: Bill Clinton said a lot of things in our interview last week. How much of it was true? Well, we've assembled a panel of experts to discuss just that: Daniel Benjamin, a counterterrorism expert for the Clinton National Security Council; Michael Scheuer, who ran the CIA unit that hunted Usama bin Laden; and Lawrence Wright, author of a behind-the-scenes new book on the run-up to 9/11 called "The Looming Tower." We should note we invited...

12 posted on 10/02/2006 7:20:36 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Not only does she make my skin crawl; she gives me acid reflux! I can't understand why people in New York can't see the obvious. She and Bill are nothing but opportunists who will say or do anything to achieve their ambitious goals. How many times have we heard both of them tell blatant lies and try to destroy anyone who stands in their way? It's too bad Chris Wallace couldn't have reached over and knocked the devil out of Clinton when he kept poking him. You can bet your bottom dollar if the big bully Clinton didn't have body guards with him, he wouldn't be poking a man. He wouldn't hesitate to take advantage of some defenseless woman. James Carville can refer to people as " trailer park white trash", but the truth is he worked for the biggest piece of "white trash" in the country.

Hillary isn't brilliant...she's stupid for being an enabler and hanging onto a man who has shown her time and time again that he's not interested in her as a wife. If she had the smarts we're told she does, she wouldn't need Bill Clinton. Neither do I think Bill Clinton is the "best" politician in the country...he belongs to a Party that is so lacking in morals that they will not hold their members accountable for their illegal acts...namely Ted Kennedy, Barney Franks, Gary Studds, Jim McDermott, Bill Clinton and numerous others. Clinton is the epitome of the worst kind of con-man, and Hillary aids and abets him, and even behaves as badly as he does.

13 posted on 10/02/2006 7:36:34 AM PDT by PeskyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

more on hillary....

14 posted on 10/02/2006 8:52:42 AM PDT by Jack Bull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson