Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Resign, Mr. Speaker
The Washington Times ^ | 10/3/2007

Posted on 10/03/2006 4:09:22 AM PDT by Taggart_D

The facts of the disgrace of Mark Foley, who was a Republican member of the House from a Florida district until he resigned last week, constitute a disgrace for every Republican member of Congress. Red flags emerged in late 2005, perhaps even earlier, in suggestive and wholly inappropriate e-mail messages to underage congressional pages. His aberrant, predatory -- and possibly criminal -- behavior was an open secret among the pages who were his prey. The evidence was strong enough long enough ago that the speaker should have relieved Mr. Foley of his committee responsibilities contingent on a full investigation to learn what had taken place, whether any laws had been violated and what action, up to and including prosecution, were warranted by the facts. This never happened....

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: foley; foleygate; hastert; page; rats; resign; tancredo4speaker; usefulidiots; washingtontimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-249 next last
To: wideawake
What ever?
21 posted on 10/03/2006 4:29:00 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: wideawake; Joe Boucher
To Joe Boucher: "With whom do you replace him, smart guy?"

The magnificent, inspiring, moral, protect-the children leader Nancy Pelosi.

Obviously.

Be careful what you wish for, Joe Boucher.

22 posted on 10/03/2006 4:34:21 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Homer1
The Republicans should also be working on their list of Democrats who were also aware of this

I agree.

Two basic questions: Who knew (R or D) and when did they know (R or D)?

If it can be shown that some one knew 1 minute before the story broke and did not do any thing to protect the children, they too should be dismissed.

There is a sickness in Congress that must be addressed.

23 posted on 10/03/2006 4:34:29 AM PDT by llevrok (When you take my gin from my cold, dead hand....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

Maybe one good thing to come out of this is that the people demanding we send gay leaders to camp with our sons will get it finally. Not holding my breath.


24 posted on 10/03/2006 4:35:04 AM PDT by muskah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Taggart_D
NPR had this as its lead into the 6 a.m. est news this morning. The Wash. Times was described as a "Washington conservative newspaper".

It is the first time that I recall a Wash. Times editorial ever being mentioned on NPR - in fact the Wash. Times has never even existed for NPR as far as its listening audience is concerned.

NPR is blatant in its bias. The process of omission and the elucidating of sought-after liberal comments from those it interviews makes it a daily propaganda source rather than a news source. Its only value is to know what the enemy is up to.

It has lately received a great deal of money - millions - through bequests from rich liberal widows and couples (whose ancestors in many instances earned it. And subsequently become even more arrogant in its bias.
25 posted on 10/03/2006 4:35:29 AM PDT by mtntop3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
Give me a break!

How about Nancy Pelosi gives you Hastert's head on a plate at her inaugural as the new Speaker of the Huse instead?

26 posted on 10/03/2006 4:36:15 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
Typical aparatchik response!
Anger at the ineffectual leadership of the party immediately translates to favor of the opposition.
Get a brain!
27 posted on 10/03/2006 4:38:31 AM PDT by Roccus (Dealing with Democrats IS the War on Terror. [Stolen from FReeper Stallone])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Reactionaries. Reading the IMs is sickening, so they forget about the fact that the emails were basically inoccuous and that's all that the Speaker saw. The FBI saw the emails and concluded the same thing. Ditto for the parents.


28 posted on 10/03/2006 4:39:59 AM PDT by palmer (Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: muskah
Maybe one good thing to come out of this is that the people demanding we send gay leaders to camp with our s

You fail to understand the liberal and MSM methods.

There will be no moral consistency in their stances. The congressional page fiasco they've manufactured is useful ONLY for ther purpose of seizing power. Once in power, they will immediately revert to full gay pro-gay agenda mode all day everyday.

29 posted on 10/03/2006 4:40:21 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

Why change leadership in response to a dem/gay activist plot right before the election? If the leadership is ineffective, why not wait until after the election?


30 posted on 10/03/2006 4:41:56 AM PDT by palmer (Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: All

Right after William Jefferson resigns.


31 posted on 10/03/2006 4:42:00 AM PDT by musikman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Taggart_D
What utter BS. If what Hastert knew was limited to the e-mails he had no evidence to pursue the matter further. To now look back with 20-20 hindsight and say he should have done more is ridiculous.

As soon as the IM information became available, Foley was shown the door. Hastert has asked for a DOJ investigation.
32 posted on 10/03/2006 4:42:27 AM PDT by PogySailor (Media bias? What media bias?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
If Hastert caves, that's weakness in the face of the enemy.

Then why hasn't he already resigned?

33 posted on 10/03/2006 4:44:48 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: palmer
To be totally honest, I'd rather see a Second Amendment solution before the election! Neither party is capable of leading the country in the fight against islamic world domination.
34 posted on 10/03/2006 4:47:33 AM PDT by Roccus (Dealing with Democrats IS the War on Terror. [Stolen from FReeper Stallone])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Taggart_D

Not much talk about the accomplishments of Foley is there? So the conservatives want Hastert to resign because Foley sent "dirty" emails to some kid. Not only that but Foley supposedly used Instant Messenger to talk dirty. Wow! I wonder if he also used the "n" word in 1970.

Why does the Washington Times not take a look at the overall impact homosexuals have on government effectiveness? Or the relationship between pedophiles and homosexuals (100% or 90%)?

Or silence owing to fear of being called a homophobe by the homosexual rights crowd (Democrats)? There are many aspects to the lack of common sense by today's leaders, both Republicans and Democrats alike, but especially Democrats.


35 posted on 10/03/2006 4:47:41 AM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Taggart_D

Precisely.....if Hastert has to resign, then so should Barney Frank and all others who have corrupted the political system.


36 posted on 10/03/2006 4:49:05 AM PDT by auto power
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

AMEN!!!


37 posted on 10/03/2006 4:51:03 AM PDT by true_blue_texican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
Democrats should fall on their swords.

Maybe we can give them a little push :-0
38 posted on 10/03/2006 4:52:56 AM PDT by true_blue_texican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Taggart_D

Let's see, two Florida newspapers saw the e-mails and did nothing. According to Drudge, law enforcement saw the e-mails and felt there was nothing to pursue. ABC had the e-mails since August. Brian Ross was too busy to pursue. Hastert "heard" about the e-mails and now he supposed to resign. Hardly.

How interesting is it that ABC is getting e-mails from other pages possibly implicating other members of Congress. Can you say 'backlash'?

If I were Hastert, I'd say, "I'm not going anywhere until the FBI, Justice Department investigation is complete."


39 posted on 10/03/2006 4:53:21 AM PDT by freedom4me ("Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom."--Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Taggart_D

When you're in charge, you're responsible for the things nobody tells you about, too. If Hastert didn't know, he should have. Sorry, but there's no other way to ensure that bosses take their jobs seriously.


40 posted on 10/03/2006 4:53:54 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-249 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson