Right.
Posted on 10/07/2006 11:42:59 AM PDT by Sam Hill
Are you behind this site?
MICHAEL ROGERS, GAY ACTIVIST & BLOGGER: I am absolutely not behind the site stopsexpredators.blogspot.com. Absolutely not. (Shudder the idea that I would support a site that encroaches on gay men's weapon of choice in "recruiting" new members.)
CARLSON: There are a number of conservative members of Congress who have gay staffers, openly gay staffers, and that doesn‘t seem to be a problem for them or for the staffers.
ROGERS: And Tucker, there are a number of gay Republicans and Democrats in Congress who I have not identified because they don‘t spend their days beating up lesbian and gay individuals. There are Republicans and Democrats that I have no interest on reporting on whatsoever because they‘re not hypocrites conservatives.
It‘s not about being gay. It‘s about being hypocritical conservative. It‘s about saying I want to live by a different set of rules than everyone else. And that to me and I would hope to the American people, be it whether or not you‘re hitting on 16-year-olds online (this guy is clearly uncomfortable with the idea of gays being criticized for going after young boys)...
CARLSON: Right.
And Elsewhere:
CARLSON: My question this: we have—we‘ve seen the family values crowd that this is affecting. What is Lou Dobson—I‘m sorry, what is James Dobson, what is Tony Perkins going to tell his constituency and their constituencies when folks like Ken Mehlman are depending on that 72-hour turnout?
CARLSON: Right.
ROGERS: I think this is a serious, serious problem for the Republican Party. I think that what we‘ve seen happen today is that the House will flip to the Democrats. That‘s my prediction.
CARLSON: Yes. I mean, this clearly hurts the Republican Party. (You're not going to out me, are you Mike?)
(Carlson = Enabling Idiot)
Item of interest:
Foley could face state charges if federal case is weak
AP via Bradenton Herald ^ | 10/6/06 | BRIAN SKOLOFF
Posted on 10/06/2006 11:59:05 PM EDT by conservative in nyc
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1715272/posts
[snip]
Some comments:
"The Federal case will be against the Democrats!! POP the POPCORN!!"
Yep...and it will include a former democrat congressmen, a former district attorney general in (a state I can not name right now), and many other nefarious characters.
OHH..and an 'internet service provider' (that will blow your mind)!
The info I gathered during the last week is now in the hands of the FBI (before it was only phoned in to three different agencies in two states....lol...you will understand why at a later date).
It is also in the hands of the Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert (faxed).
It is in the hands of my attorney (in case I get dragged into this for finding it in open source material and some fancy lawyer wants to try and intimidate me) and trusted friends.
It needs to be let out and soon. You folks be the judge! Let the American people decide!
At the very least, these actors in this larger potential conspiracy need to be hauled before a GRAND JURY...and sworn in to testify before the CONGRESS!
Every trusted individual in my life is urging me to release the info.
Pretty soon..this is not going to be about Mark Foley and his despicable acts.....and if it does not get brought into these hearings on some technicality...the American people are going to demand separate Congressional Hearings when they hear this!
Folks, there are files disappearing from my computer now...emails dropping into a blackhole...hang up calls from hidden numbers (3 from DC) since I started putting this potential part of the puzzle together.
Thankfully, it has been stored elsewhere and printed out...all of the files and emails.
There are plenty of people now in the know (for you du lurkers and moles)...the story will come out and there is not going to be any way for the dems to spin this one!!
WHEWW...that felt good!
Nite ALL!
22 posted on 10/07/2006 1:15:20 AM EDT by penelopesire
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1715272/posts?page=22#22
To: penelopesire
ok glad that you made it it alright last night. :) get someone to look at your computer situation. If you're not behind a router right now go get one.
something like this or the DI-624 model is cheaper like $50something. www.majorgeeks.com download zone alarm firewall(its free and effective)
61 posted on 10/07/2006 1:20:38 PM EDT by Echo Talon
To: Suzy Quzy
"I didn't understand why it would envelope a former Dem member and an asst dist. atty.....are we on the wrong track with zeroing in on the Katsaros's and Soros??"
I would not say that at all..look at how much relevant info freepers and bloggers have turned up already!! It is phenomenal! You guys have been getting to the immediate questions..like who are the actors, who knew and when, etc....that is important stuff. I just went in a different direction and turned up some disturbing info that may or may not have anything to do with this case, but when the American people find out about it....the normal ones are NOT GOING TO WANT TO VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT FOR A VERY LONG TIME!!
Sometimes if we always shout 'SOROS' (even though he is involved) we start to sound like we blame everything on a left wing conspiracy(even though there is one). It just makes sense to go after the small and medium fish first. Often when they get hauled into a grand jury..they will spill the beans.
48 posted on 10/07/2006 9:43:18 AM EDT by penelopesire
he considerss himself ( or calls himself ) a republican.
The Democrat Party trades on gay shame to manufacture votes, and yet gays vote lockstep with a Democrat Party that treats them lower than dirt, reminiscent of the way that the Democrats have always treated African-Americans.
This is reason enough to deny the Democrats from ever regaining power in Congress -- they can't even treat their own constituents with anything but contempt.
That's the way I look at it. He's going to out them so voters know who they are and can get rid of them. I'll bet that isn't his intention. I don't see a downside. :)
I'm a very stubborn, very conservative independent and vote only for conservatives, but this whole farce has pushed me to vote a straight Republican ticket. I hope Mr. Homo Activist here outs them soon so I can make my plans.
The RNC should tie these "outings" around the Democrats' neck. Just as with their trying to make Mary Cheney a political issue, I think that the decent people of the US will be revolted by this mean-spirited hypocritical tactic of the Dems and the gay activists.
yOU GO GIRL!..We'll make sure that all the ones
on the DimoPervert Left are exposed too.
..Not that the Party of the Big Tent for Perverts,
Thieves and Convicts, will do anything but raise
them up on their shulders and stick their tounges
up their poop chutes, when not defending them as
being victims and or "ahrdworking but flawed"
public servants....
But it'll be good to have all their names and
"appetites" in tthe public record for future
use.
I agree with you. Frankly I wondering about FR... I get this feeling that many here in FR, are "outraged" with the Dems are for doing something so "dirty" outing queers (tired of PC bs) working for Republicans... WHEN THE FIRST instinct should be OUTRAGE yes, but not at the Dems, BUT AT THE REPUBLICANS who hire queers and in doing so, slap value-voters in our faces! I am a Social Values voter and this was the MAIN reason I became vote Republican.
"Winning" for me as in holding the houses AT ANY COST... it ain't my idea of "winning." Winning is not alwasy winning and losing sometimes may lead to real winnings.
Part of the homo culture is the recruitment of young boys. I wonder how much boy butter Mikey has experienced just this year?
Que sera sera. I think losing control (such as it is) of Congress would be a bad thing, but if it happens then good things may come out of it.
Same here and I DO hope they keep it. Two things the Reps have done I am very happy about. The two supreme court additions and very grateful to the house for holding the line on the Immigration invasion and coming up with something that makes sense on border security. For those two reasons I will vote for my Reps in VA, even for Allen at this point but it maybe the last time, depending of certain developments as to his staff.
So where is the outrage on the part of the "gay community" and "gay activists"?
If this were the other way around, a Republican started to "out" homosexual staffers, the outrage would be all over the MSM front pages about how hateful Republicans are making private lives public, demonstrating their hatred for gays and what an outrage this is, because gays are entitled to their privacy, same as everyone else.
And now... all I hear from the gay community is crickets.
Right.
Are you aware that none of the links you provided in Post #1 work?
Maybe because gay conservatives don't feel the need to tell everyont their gay as if what they do in their bedrooms is anyone else's business.
Unlike liberal gays who want to shove it down our throats.
Bookmarked --- Thanks
The concept of outings only reinforces the fact that homosexuals are subject to blackmail and therefore should not be elected, appointed or hired for positions that will bring them into contact with children or other human beings.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.