Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS News' Katie Couric Labels Pro-Life View on Abortion "Repugnant" (Media Bias Alert!)
LifeNews ^ | October 5, 2006 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 10/08/2006 5:54:35 AM PDT by NYer

New York, NY (LifeNews.com) -- CBS News' main anchor Katie Couric is coming under fire for saying some viewers may consider the pro-life views of a recent guest "repugnant." Her statement came after a father of a victim of the Columbine shootings, responding to the recent shooting at an Amish school, said abortion has cheapened people's view of life.

As part of its new evening news format, which Couric hosts, CBS News features a "free speech" segment which allows a wide range of people to comment on issues and headlines of the day.

CBS News featured Denver resident Brian Rohrbough, whose 15-year-old son Daniel was killed in the Columbine massacre. In his interview, aired nationally on the program, Rohrbough said abortion has caused a dimmer view of the sanctity of human life.

"I am saddened and shaken by the shooting at an Amish school today and last week's school murders," Rohrbough said. "When my son Dan was murdered on the sidewalk at Columbine High School on April 20th, 1999, I hoped that would be the last school shooting."

"Since that day, I tried to answer the question why did this happen?" Rohrbough added.

"This country is in a moral free fall. For over two generations, the public school system has taught in a moral vacuum," he explained. "We teach there are no absolutes, no right or wrong. And I assure you, the murder of innocent children is always wrong, including by abortion."

"Abortion has diminished the value of children," Rohrbough, who is a member of the board of directors of Colorado Right to Life, said.

Reacting to criticism from abortion advocates that he appeared on the show, Couric, on her Internet blog, wrote, "We knew when we decided to put on this segment that a lot of people would disagree with it. We also knew some might even find it repugnant."

In an op-ed responding to Couric, Fox News host Bill O'Reilly criticized her remarks.

"Repugnant? Why would any fair-minded person find Mr. Rohrbough's opinion repugnant?" O'Reilly asked. "You can disagree with the man, but using a word like "repugnant" marginalizes his legitimate opinion. Millions of Americans see it the way Mr. Rohrbough does."

"Now I don't believe Ms. Couric meant to demean the man, but her words reflect the elitist attitude common in network news and in the general media," O'Reilly added. "Using the word 'repugnant' might restore Ms. Couric's cocktail party credibility, but it is an unfortunate choice of words."

Rohrbough has been attacked on the left-wing blogs and on the CBS News Web site.

"I do applaud CBS News for giving Mr. Rohrbough a platform, but everyone can see how uncomfortable it has made the network. That should not be the case," O'Reilly said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: Colorado; US: New York
KEYWORDS: abortion; colombine; couric; cultureofdeath; prolife; somesay
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

1 posted on 10/08/2006 5:54:37 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...
Catholic Ping List
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


2 posted on 10/08/2006 5:55:28 AM PDT by NYer ("It is easier for the earth to exist without sun than without the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.” PPio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
We know what is in her heart.

But technically speaking, the article headline is not correct as it does not conform to the article. She had said (even if it were cleverness on her part), that 'even some people might find it repugnant.' She did not call it repugnant herself which is the exact title of the article. I am not playing devil's advocate. I am just commenting on the journalism here. Again, certainly this is her view, but she herself did not directly say that, only insinuated. Hence here clever nature.

3 posted on 10/08/2006 5:57:38 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (..is an American allright, but is not in Japan, folks. Thanks for letting me keep the moniker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

One of the things I despise about the left is their lack of intellectual honesty. This author is intellectually dishonest and needs to change the title, which is misleading.


4 posted on 10/08/2006 5:58:31 AM PDT by Flightdeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
"some viewers may consider...", "critics say...", "some people have said..."

All words used to allow the injection of their own opinion into the news. Nothing new.

5 posted on 10/08/2006 6:00:16 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
You know... repugnent... as in Hitler found it repugnent when criticized of his plans to enslave/exterminate the 'untermensch'.
6 posted on 10/08/2006 6:01:58 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Katie watch

Doogle

7 posted on 10/08/2006 6:03:05 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF 69-73...."never store a threat you should have eliminated")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Amazingly I've never watched the woman.


8 posted on 10/08/2006 6:07:45 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

What heart ?


9 posted on 10/08/2006 6:08:09 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck

I would say some viewers may find Katie repugnant. I don't have to hide behind some viewers and may though. I find Katie repugnant I will never watch her show.


10 posted on 10/08/2006 6:08:21 AM PDT by YdontUleaveLibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Strangely enough, I often find Ms. Couric repugnant!
11 posted on 10/08/2006 6:09:29 AM PDT by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The drive-by-media must be in a dither over this one....on one hand, this is a man they could use to their advantage, as an anit-gun poster child....however, now they find out he is pro-life!! And blaming the schools! and society! not the NRA for his son'd death!! Poor Lame stream media....


12 posted on 10/08/2006 6:11:42 AM PDT by SAMS (Nobody loves a soldier until the enemy is at the gate; Army Wife & Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

>>"We knew when we decided to put on this segment that a lot of people would disagree with it. We also knew some might even find it repugnant."<<

Way to go minimalizing the man grief, Katie you crud.


13 posted on 10/08/2006 6:11:55 AM PDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

The very thought of her is repugnant to me.


14 posted on 10/08/2006 6:12:47 AM PDT by Rider on the Rain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Sometimes, I feel badly that courics mom was pro-life.


15 posted on 10/08/2006 6:13:49 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Other than a couple of times years ago, I have never watched her either I am happy to say. After she had been on the evening news for several weeks. I watched her just because I wanted to see how she looked, hair, makeup, clothes, demeanor, etc. you know, girl stuff.

She looked stiff and uncomfortable, pale and lifeless. Her new job doesn't seem to be agreeing with her.
16 posted on 10/08/2006 6:16:28 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Couric's ratings are not low enough.

She needs to be at the "statistical zero" mark. IOW the same ratings as a test pattern.


17 posted on 10/08/2006 6:22:02 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Katie (Botox) Couric is a birdbrain.

Repugnant = the report my niece passed on to us this weekend. She's a 3rd year nursing student. One of her clinicals is at a clinic which deals with teens and women who have recently had abortions. The teens are despondent. She advised these 14 year olds to talk to their moms. Unfortunately, they are unable to do that because their moms do not know that they had abortions.

The other 3 women were seriously depressed - 21 - 25 - 34.

According to my niece the aftermath of these abortions is devastation. That is repugnant.

Also repugnant: As of 2006, eight medical organizations recognize that abortion raises a woman's risk for breast cancer, independently of the risk of delaying the birth of a first child (a secondary effect that all experts already acknowledge). An additional medical organization, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, issued a statement in 2003 calling on doctors to inform patients about a "highly plausible" relationship between abortion and breast cancer. General counsel for that medical group wrote an article for its journal warning doctors that three women (two Americans, one Australian) successfully sued their abortion providers for neglecting to disclose the risks of breast cancer and emotional harm, although none of the women had developed the disease. more

18 posted on 10/08/2006 6:22:53 AM PDT by xtinct (I was the next door neighbor kid's imaginary friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

Doogle, that's goooooood.


19 posted on 10/08/2006 6:26:31 AM PDT by krunkygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
You want repugnant?

I'll give you stinkin' repugnant.

AVERT YOUR EYES!

AVERT YOUR EYES!

AGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHH, MY EYES!!!

NOW THAT'S REPUGANT!


20 posted on 10/08/2006 6:30:40 AM PDT by Stallone (Dealing with Democrats IS the War on Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson