Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mike Sexton to go on The Offensive For Online Poker This Coming Week
Poker News ^ | October 07, 2006 | John Caldwell

Posted on 10/08/2006 8:13:02 AM PDT by baystaterebel

It seems the poker world has been under siege for the past week or so. With the passage of the Unlawful Internet Gaming Act a little over as week ago, and the media attention the passing of the bill has gotten, it is starting to feel like the poker world is like it used to be – a small gang of people fighting for the survival of this great game.

This coming week, the 'Ambassador of Poker', Mike Sexton is going to fight the good fight in a very public way. PokerNews.com has learned that Sexton is going to embark on a 'Media Blitz' campaign this coming week in New York City, and possibly Washington D.C. in an effort to call attention to the great injustice that has been done to people's right's everywhere with the passage of the Unlawful Internet Gaming Act.

(Excerpt) Read more at pokernews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
This should have been long before the Unlawful Internet Gambling Act was snuck through by attaching it to the Port Security Act.
1 posted on 10/08/2006 8:13:03 AM PDT by baystaterebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: baystaterebel
Seems more like an advertisement for on-line poker than a Freep news article to me. Just my opinion...
2 posted on 10/08/2006 8:16:16 AM PDT by 69ConvertibleFirebird (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baystaterebel

Too little too late. If online poker wants back in, they're going to have to cough up some chips to the Big Dealers in Washington.


3 posted on 10/08/2006 8:19:15 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 69ConvertibleFirebird
Seems more like an advertisement for on-line poker than a Freep news article to me. Just my opinion...

The legislation in question seems more like it is written to protect political donations from Las Vegas and Jersey than tp protect Americans. What a joke. The Republicans responsible for this should be ashamed. Just my opinion.

4 posted on 10/08/2006 8:21:42 AM PDT by shempy (EABOF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: baystaterebel

They'll ban online gambling, but they won't ban online pornograpny, which is a FAR greater danger.


5 posted on 10/08/2006 8:24:15 AM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Pornography kills - a man's soul, a woman's spirit, a child's body.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baystaterebel

No Poker - No Vote


6 posted on 10/08/2006 8:25:50 AM PDT by Lexington Green (Are we as free as we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lexington Green
No Poker - No Vote

Funny. I feel the same way, and yet I've never played a single hand online.

ML/NJ

7 posted on 10/08/2006 8:40:22 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: baystaterebel

This guy needs to learn from the horseracing industry-

"Frist was able to pick up key Senate support after including a carve-out for the politically powerful horse racing industry."

That's right, politically powerful.

That political clout didn't happen accidentally and isn't a result of one or a handful of people who have "connections" in Washington, D.C. The political power the horse racing industry now enjoys in our nation's capital is a result of a strategy planned and executed by the National Thoroughbred Racing Association, and supported by knowledgeable individuals who understand that contributions to the NTRA's Legislative Action Campaign and Political Action Committee are an investment in their future.

Some background.

The Legislative Action Campaign supports lobbyists hired by the NTRA to represent them in discussions with members of Congress and, more importantly, their staff -- which does the real behind-the-scenes work in legislative matters. Funds also help provide an annual payment to the American Horse Council, which often works side-by-side with the NTRA.

Money for the Legislative Action Campaign comes from breeders, consignors, and buyers in the form of a 0.25% checkoff on transactions -- plus various funds from sale companies. "All the money focuses exclusively on Washington, D.C., and legislative activities that improve the economics of the business," said Peggy Hendershot, who as the NTRA's vice president of legislative and corporate planning oversees the program.

Individuals (including foreign nationals) and corporations are free to give to the Legislative Action Campaign, and there is no limit on the amount of the contribution, which may be deductible as an ordinary business expense."

http://opinions.bloodhorse.com/viewstory.asp?id=35484


8 posted on 10/08/2006 8:46:35 AM PDT by gate2wire (Never Forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp

IT's not a total ban, they just banned the sites they can't bilk. This legislation was never about protecting people, it's about money.


9 posted on 10/08/2006 8:52:24 AM PDT by tfecw (It's for the children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: baystaterebel
It's time for standing up and speaking out on behalf of our freedom of choice, which has been violated

I am an occasional Internet poker player and a smoker. In the past two weeks the Federal government has made my poker playing a criminal offense, and my local County government has made smoking in bars and restaurants a criminal offense. At the same time my State government, which runs a lucrative lottery business, has authorized the establishment of slot machine gambling houses where there will be an exception to the smoking ban. My only hope is that once we have thrown the Taliban out of Afghanistan we make an effort to throw them out of our Federal, State, and Local governments. And, I look forward with great interest to see how this unconstitutional Federal Internet gambling law is subverted. Government seems determined to turn every one of us into criminals by enacting laws from which they exempt themselves.

10 posted on 10/08/2006 9:00:41 AM PDT by layman (Card Carrying Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: layman
"At the same time my State government, which runs a lucrative lottery business, has authorized the establishment of slot machine gambling houses where there will be an exception to the smoking ban."

The hypocrisy and corruption of our elected officials is sickening. Even worse is the fact that only suckers play slot machines or lotteries since the odds are so bad. For most people, poker is a game of skill and a form of entertainment. It sickens me how corrupt our Republican leadership is. It seems like they were never for limited government even in the first place.

On a side note, both Nixon & Truman were avid poker players.

11 posted on 10/08/2006 9:28:09 AM PDT by Left2Right ("Democracy isn't perfect, but other governments are so much worse")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp

"They'll ban online gambling, but they won't ban online pornograpny, which is a FAR greater danger."

Right! This is exactly what I posted on a thread yesterday. With all the talk about this being a "pander to the Christian right wing" nobody has brought up the failure to ban porno. OK, I'll admit they tried at one point, and I'll even admit that they are striving to go after internet pedophiles, etc. But I still do not know the real reason why this was done.


12 posted on 10/08/2006 10:37:24 AM PDT by jocon307 (The Silent Majority - silent no longer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
But I still do not know the real reason why this [banning online gambling, but not pornography] was done.

Because they won't get their cut of the profits?

13 posted on 10/11/2006 6:54:54 PM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Pornography kills - a man's soul, a woman's spirit, a child's body.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: baystaterebel

I hate politicians


14 posted on 10/11/2006 6:55:57 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

It's really fun, and because they have certain limits as to how much you can deposit and table maximums it is less risky, although still so, than going to the local casino (that is if you have on in your area).


15 posted on 10/12/2006 6:00:41 PM PDT by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: shempy

Indian Casinos too.

I don't care if they have to work more days, but it is crap how things like this are done. This was a Port Security bill. So, even if you are for poker, you can't vote no on the bill, because you screw our safety. It just isn't right.

I would like an amendment to the constitution seriesly. Congress can only appropriate in appropriation bills. If you want to ban online betting, do it on a straight up or down.

But, if anybody had the cojones to vote no on this bill because of the "poker aspect" of Port safety, their opponent would be running ads saying they were against protecting our ports. That is why this is such crap. It shouldn't be done this way.


16 posted on 10/12/2006 6:04:09 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gate2wire

Online Poker is not going away. This new legislation is designed to hinder it's progress by not allowing U.S. based online poker businesses. It is expressly supported by an already powerful lobby in D.C. Vegas Casinos, Indian Casinos, and Atlantic City Casinos.

I foresee more legislation coming down the pipe.


17 posted on 10/12/2006 6:04:44 PM PDT by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: phoenix0468

Yes, I agree. Just pointing out that racing got their exemption because of a pretty organized lobbying effort.


18 posted on 10/12/2006 6:07:28 PM PDT by gate2wire (Please Lord, look after 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp

That's damn near impossible, because much of it is free. All this bill does is make it illegal to accept money off a credit card for gambling sites.


19 posted on 10/12/2006 6:08:39 PM PDT by RockinRight (She rocks my world, and I rock her world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
All this bill does is make it illegal to accept money off a credit card for gambling sites.

From the language of the bill your sentence should read:

All this bill does is make it illegal to accept money off a credit card for gambling sites run within the United States.
20 posted on 10/12/2006 6:25:25 PM PDT by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: phoenix0468; RockinRight
All this bill does is make it illegal to accept money off a credit card for gambling sites run within the United States.

I don't believe that to be the case. I play at two online poker sites, neither of which are US based and both of them today have banned me from playing at real money tables.

21 posted on 10/13/2006 6:40:16 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
That's damn near impossible, because much of it is free. All this bill does is make it illegal to accept money off a credit card for gambling sites.

I wasn't aware of free pornography. If the gambling ban is supposed to protect the children, how would it do that? Children aren't using their own credit cards to indulge in online gambling, so that excuse is fake.

Again, the far greater danger is child pornography, where adults are buying images of children. That's the real danger to children - where *some* men are turning their online fantasies into reality by hunting children down. Men who view child pornography also view children differently. There's a danger in that alone. That's why you're seeing the proliferation of adult-to-child crime. That's why the NBC show is catching child predators. Why the hell is the government so blind that they can't see this? Where are the child advocates on THIS? Guess they're too busy banning snack foods in school cafeterias.

22 posted on 10/14/2006 11:21:29 AM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Pornography kills - a man's soul, a woman's spirit, a child's body.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson