Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alan Fine demanding retraction of story; Star Tribune stands by it
Minneapolis Star and Tribune ^ | 8 October 2006 | Paul McEnroe

Posted on 10/08/2006 4:57:25 PM PDT by shrinkermd

Alan Fine, the south Minneapolis congressional candidate who had his 1995 criminal record of domestic violence expunged in 2004, demanded Saturday that the Star Tribune retract its story outlining his arrest and details of alleged attacks against his first ex-wife that are contained in the couple's divorce file.

"...The newspaper obtained an expunged copy of a June 1995 Minneapolis police report that stated Fine was arrested and booked into Hennepin County jail after officers were called to his home following a domestic abuse call from his then-wife, Rebecca Wexler.

(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: alan; alanfine; destruction; fine; personal; politics; strib
What is crucial to understand is this Republican Candidate for the 5th District had his divorce sealed and then the records including the police records expunged.

Somehow Anders Gyllenhaal okayed this dishonorable action even though the fifth district has not voted Republican in over 50 years. Also to be noted, is the Strib was unable to find much on his opponent--Keith Ellison--even though Keith had a long history of belonging to a Black Muslim group with antisemitic leanings.

The actions here are much the same taken against Barak Obama's opponent in the Illinois Senate race in 2004. Here, a West Coast liberal judge opened up a sealed divorce record of the Republican candidate suggesting he had asked his wife to have sex in a public place. This ended his political career.

The drive by media and the Democrats play for keeps and practice personal destruction as one of their greatest and most often used tools.

Anders Gyllenhaal may not be the devil incarnate but he and his newspaper would solidly endorse satan's Democrat, disciple for the fifth district without qualms. They would also do everything possible to destroy any Republican opponent by any honorable or dishonarable means.

Congratulations Alan Fine! Fight back. History marches on. Your time will come again. In the meantime, where oh where is the "free" newspaper like they have in Washington DC and San Francisco? In the UK they not only have free papers but they deliver them!

1 posted on 10/08/2006 4:57:27 PM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Seal and Expunged are one thing. The vulcan mind trick to get everyone to forget about it, that's another.

F him, GOP or RAT for even thinking about hitting his wife.

IMO

2 posted on 10/08/2006 5:00:25 PM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (Even The Nicest Pug Has An Evil Twin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

Minnesota ping


3 posted on 10/08/2006 5:01:14 PM PDT by ER Doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Then Governor Roemer (D) of CO did the same thing to his (R) opponent in the 90's who was beating him in the polls. The (R) lost.

RATS are evil, and can't stand what most Americans would consider a fair fight. No other rational explaination.


4 posted on 10/08/2006 5:04:47 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with political enemies who are going senile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

guessing it's the ex wif'es copy ?


5 posted on 10/08/2006 5:10:04 PM PDT by stylin19a ("Klaatu Barada Nikto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Don't miss the scoop on his Democratic opponent Ellison. Glad I don't live in Minnesota.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1663336/posts

6 posted on 10/08/2006 5:10:08 PM PDT by redgirlinabluestate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty

If true.


7 posted on 10/08/2006 5:18:35 PM PDT by DB ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DB

Yes, if true.


8 posted on 10/08/2006 5:19:16 PM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (Even The Nicest Pug Has An Evil Twin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Running as a Repub in the 5th, Fine was already toast. I prefer Gyllenhaal and the Strib spending their time and energy digging up Fine's dirty laundry rather than tarring candidates who are actually in competitive races.
9 posted on 10/08/2006 5:24:22 PM PDT by Zeroisanumber (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/015484.php


10 posted on 10/08/2006 5:28:16 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Offended By Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
RATS are evil, and can't stand what most Americans would consider a fair fight. No other rational explanation.

This is politics, not the Olympic Games. In politics, anyone who fights a fair fight when he doesn't have to is a sucker, and don't think for a second that we wouldn't do the same thing is situations were reversed.

11 posted on 10/08/2006 5:30:18 PM PDT by Zeroisanumber (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty
F him, GOP or RAT for even thinking about hitting his wife.

The underlying reasons divorce records are often sealed are 1) They're about an intensely private matter, an inherently pre-rational zone;

2) The standards of proof for claims made in such proceedings are low, and the statements often lies encouraged by lawyers and relatives, designed for revenge or money. If a wife wants to keep her husband from seeing the children, it's routine to falsely allege that he's violent.

That's why once they're sealed, they shouldn't be unsealed. The truth is often not served as a result.

12 posted on 10/08/2006 5:37:58 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber

I disagree, and so do many experts on this subject. We don't do the same thing when the situations are reversed.

That's an urban legend dispelled many times.

The Foley scandal is just the latest example of (probably) legal but unethical things Repubs don’t do, but RATS do do.


13 posted on 10/08/2006 5:38:11 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with political enemies who are going senile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber

That's the problem though, Z.

There's so much dirt on Ellison, but if the lib media is on his side, he wins.

The whole thing stinks. I wish the pubbies would learn to vet people better before they run them. Of course, we've all got a skeleton or two. Mine only come out on Halloween. Everybody runs in horror! :)


14 posted on 10/08/2006 5:38:21 PM PDT by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SamuraiScot
I clarified it in post #8 for DB.

Thank you for pointing out the disservice that comes during a nasty divorce proceeding.

15 posted on 10/08/2006 5:42:08 PM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (Even The Nicest Pug Has An Evil Twin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty
From Powerline Blog:

UPDATE: I haven't had time for exhaustive research, but expungement of criminal records is governed by Chapter 609A of the Minnesota Statutes. Here are some of the relevant provisions. Sec. 609A.01:

The remedy available is limited to a court order sealing the records and prohibiting the disclosure of their existence or their opening except under court order or statutory authority. Sec. 609A.03, Subd. 5(c):

If the court issues an expungement order it may require that the criminal record be sealed, the existence of the record not be revealed, and the record not be opened except as required under subdivision 7. Subd. 7(b)(1):

(b) Notwithstanding the issuance of an expungement order: (1) an expunged record may be opened for purposes of a criminal investigation, prosecution, or sentencing, upon an ex parte court order;

I haven't seen the expungement order, but it is hard to see how the Star Tribune could have "obtained" the expunged records legally under these provisions. Again, we don't have all the answers, but an investigation appears to be in order.

Candidate Fine has always denied he slapped his then wife. She did drop all charges.

16 posted on 10/08/2006 5:44:35 PM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
who had his 1995 criminal record of domestic violence expunged

Isn't that a false statement by the writer? I thought that the case never came to trial, therefore there can be no "criminal record" stemming from mere uncorroborated allegations...

17 posted on 10/08/2006 5:45:47 PM PDT by The Electrician ("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Yes, I thought the below is quite the issue:

Interesting. Does the Strib "routinely" check Hennepin County records from 1995? Or do they routinely do record checks on Republican nominees? The real question, though, is, how did the Strib "obtain" the expunged record that was supposed to remain confidential? One possible source, of course, is Amy Klobuchar, the Hennepin County Attorney who is running for the U.S. Senate. Did Klobuchar or one of her aides leak the expunged record to the newspaper to help her fellow Democrat? If so, was a crime committed? We know that the Klobuchar campaign has already been involved in one dirty trick, which resulted in her communications director being referred to the FBI for possible criminal prosecution. Is this another instance where the Klobuchar campaign may be involved in criminal activity? This whole episode cries out for an investigation. I don't suppose, though, that the Strib will be calling for one.

18 posted on 10/08/2006 5:46:37 PM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mplsconservative
There's so much dirt on Ellison, but if the lib media is on his side, he wins.

The Strib isn't going to rock the boat in an election year where the Dems have a better than even chance of kicking our asses. A conservative reporter with an ounce of pull and moxie could make a reasonable case that either Ellison is an anti-Semite or that he hung-out with a bunch of anti-Semites and then lied about it.

But since that's not going to happen, I'll just thank my lucky stars that they're flogging the Repub candidate in a race that was almost a foregone conclusion from the outset rather than digging up dirt on Pawlenty.

I'm already bracing myself for Sen. Klobuchar, I don't know if I could handle Gov. Hatch.

19 posted on 10/08/2006 5:49:37 PM PDT by Zeroisanumber (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
POWERLINE blog has a detailed account of this situation. It is much more involved than this synopsis. Ellison has been involved with Muslims for nine years. Fine was charged with slapping his wife, which he denied, charges were dropped and records expunged and sealed. She is now his ex. On May 16, 2005, a young woman called 911 and reported that Ellison had assaulted her. There are more details of later complaints of assault by Ellison which the Strib didn't mention. It seems the Star Tribune has an agenda not favorable to Republican.
20 posted on 10/08/2006 5:55:35 PM PDT by mountainfolk (God bless President George Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Klobuchar probably didn't leak it or have her people leak it. That said, she and Hatch have probably hired and promoted a number of Dems who (allthough unconnected to the campaign) would gleefully leak information like that to the press.


21 posted on 10/08/2006 5:56:00 PM PDT by Zeroisanumber (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber

You've got a good point there about the Strib going after Fine. Whenever they waste their precious resources going after someone who is virtually unelectable in the Fever Swamp, is all right, I guess. I've met Alan, though, and he seems like a respectable individual. I hate to see anyone's dirty laundry put on display for the masses.

That's why basically good people with some great ideas stay out of the political spectrum.

I admire those who get into the fray. I wouldn't get ready for a Senator Klobuchar yet. Yes, it is possible, Urrrp!

I'm an out-stater now and Kennedy signs are running 10-1 against Miss Amy. If I continued to live in the inner-city, I would think all is lost.

The rats might be in for a big surprise after all of their feel good polls. Minnesota is not just the land of tall buildings. All of us hicks get to vote too. :)


22 posted on 10/08/2006 6:11:08 PM PDT by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
The actions here are much the same taken against Barak Obama's opponent in the Illinois Senate race in 2004. Here, a West Coast liberal judge opened up a sealed divorce record of the Republican candidate suggesting he had asked his wife to have sex in a public place. This ended his political career.

I think about that every time I see actress Jeri Ryan of the new CBS show Shark, who didn't want it to become public, and who supported her ex's bid for the Senate. It was a dirty trick laundered through the Freedom of Information act.

That being said -- in light of recent events, I wonder: if Senator Ryan had won, would he have become a time bomb ready to explode in October of a future election year?

23 posted on 10/08/2006 6:29:21 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Normal people would kill to save their kids. Muslim fascists raise their kids to die killing others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

They must be standing by it under the fake but accurate clause. If the charges were dropped then it wasn't criminal except in the black and white of the headlines.


24 posted on 10/08/2006 7:19:34 PM PDT by YdontUleaveLibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty

You are so right...to even think of having a Republican to represent Americans (even Minnesotans) when you can get a real black moslim with a history of breaking or ignoring laws makes much more sense.


25 posted on 10/09/2006 6:56:01 AM PDT by newcthem (Brought to you by the INFIDEL PARTY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

bump


26 posted on 10/09/2006 7:20:48 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson