Posted on 10/08/2006 7:30:13 PM PDT by GMMAC
Suspect in terror hunt used veil to evade arrest
The Times (UK)
October 09, 2006
By Sean ONeill and Anthony Browne
A MALE suspect in a major anti-terrorist investigation in Britain escaped capture by allegedly disguising himself as a Muslim woman dressed in a burka, The Times can reveal.
The man, who was wanted in connection with serious terrorist offences, evaded arrest for several days as police searched for him across the country.
The fact that a fugitive remained at large after disguising himself in an Islamic dress which covered his face will further fuel the debate sparked by Jack Straw, Leader of the House of Commons, about the wearing of the veil.
Details of the mans true identity were circulated to ports and airports to try to prevent him leaving the country.
He was eventually caught and is now one of more than 90 suspects in British prisons awaiting trial on terror charges.
The suspects name and the detail of the offences he is accused of cannot be revealed because of the danger of prejudicing his forthcoming trial.
It is the first time that a male suspect has allegedly disguised himself as a Muslim woman in Britain. However, the tactic has been used frequently by Islamist fighters including suicide bombers in Iraq and Afghanistan. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the former leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq, often dressed in a burka to evade American forces hunting him.
Counter-terrorist agencies in Britain and Europe have long been concerned about the readiness of male Islamist terrorists to wear female clothing.
The issue of people hiding their faces under the burka, which covers the whole face, or behind the niqab, which exposes only the eyes, has also posed difficulties for banks, immigration authorities and benefit offices. But questions of security have tended to be overruled by the need to maintain good community relations.
Shahid Malik, Labour MP for Dewsbury, expressed concern that the issue could create unnecessary tension. "If this is true, then it is the first case of its kind in Britain and an isolated incident. We must not get hysterical about it. There have been many hundreds of cases where robberies have been committed by men wearing womens stockings on their heads but no one is talking about banning stockings.
"The important thing is that the police and the security services should feel comfortable and confident about stopping anyone who they have suspicions about, whatever they are wearing."
Speaking on the BBC, John Prescott, the Deputy Prime Minister, said: "I fear sometimes people might use it in a more prejudiced way and I am concerned it may damage relations rather than improve them."
He added that he would not follow Mr Straws practice of asking Muslim women in constituency meetings to uncover their faces.
Patricia Hewitt, the Health Secretary, also disagreed with Mr Straws stance. She said that in the past she had regarded the veil as a symbol of womens oppression, but changed her mind after a meeting with a Muslim woman in her constituency. "Shed made the decision not her parents or anybody else that she wanted, as part of her statement of her faith, to wear the veil."
However, Mr Straw was backed by Phil Woolas, the minister responsible for community cohesion, race and faith, whose Oldham constituency contains a large Muslim population. Writing in the Sunday Mirror, he said: "Most British-born Muslims who wear it do so as an assertion of their identity and religion. This can create fear and resentment among non-Muslims and lead to discrimination. Muslims then become even more determined to assert their identity, and so it becomes a vicious circle where the only beneficiaries are racists like the BNP."
Anila Baig, a columnist on The Sun newspaper, reported that at Leeds-Bradford airport no member of security had asked her to remove her niqab to check her identity against her passport picture.
Muslim organisations have complained about receiving hate mail since Mr Straw referred to the veil as "a visible statement of separation" in his local newspaper. A spokesman for The Muslim Safety Forum said that there had been an increase in attacks against Muslims, and added: "We are concerned that Jack Straws comments will be picked up by certain elements of the community who want to spread Islamophobia."
PING!
"The issue of people hiding their faces under the burka, which covers the whole face, or behind the niqab, which exposes only the eyes, has also posed difficulties for banks, immigration authorities and benefit offices. But questions of security have tended to be overruled by the need to maintain good community relations."
Maintain good community relations - IOW, act like scared neutered rabbits so Muslims won't get violent and hurt them.
"But questions of security have tended to be overruled by the need to maintain good community relations."
Here is the mistake, bowing to PC pressure. USA, take note.
Then take him to the dock at the Old Bailey still dressed in his burkha. Tell the magistrate that it is his preferred mode of dress.
The yobs in the nick ought to have some fun with him.
If a man walks into a bank or a ferry dock or an airport terminal wearing a stocking over his head, people are going to assume that he is up to no good.
An ostensible woman wearing a burkha in a Commonwealth country is not going to attract that kind of notice.
Even if she does attract notice, it would be politically incorrect to ask her to identify herself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.