Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

S. Korean Lawmaker, "Russia might have given N. Korea know-how of miniature nukes"
Chosun Ilbo ^ | 10/11/06

Posted on 10/11/2006 2:33:45 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

/begin my translation

S. Korean Lawmaker, "Russia might have given know-how of miniature nukes to N. Korea"

Kong Sung-jin, a S. Korean opposition lawmaker at Intelligence Committee of National Assembly, told on Oct. 11, "We have intelligence that the reason why Russia is the first nation N. Korea gave advance warning of its nuclear test is because Russia gave N. Korea technology for miniaturizing nukes. They are trying to verify the allegation."

Legislator Kong appeared on 'Open World Today with Chang Sung-min,' a news talk show of Pyong-hwa Radio, and commented, "Russia and China were the first to know N. Korea's nuclear test. Even though it is not verified, we heard that N. Korea notified Russia two hours before the test."

He maintained, "I am sure that N. Korea want to keep equal distance from both countries, but it may also reflect N. Korea's deep dissatisfaction with China, due to its recent pressure on N. Korea."

"China got notified 20 minutes before the test, and notified S. Korea, U.S., and Japan in this order. That is why S. Korea got informed at 10:50 am (Oct. 9.) Since neither of U.S., Japan, and China had not detected underground nuclear test (in advance,) it is not fair that our intelligence gathering ability is at fault."

Seoul = Yonhap News

2006.10.11

/end my translation



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: china; horizontaltunnel; korea; miniaturenuke; northkorea; nucleartest; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: Thunder90
Clinton gave Russia our nuclear secrets (Design specs, missile specs, ect) as part of treaties he signed with them.

Which treaties? Can you post some details?

41 posted on 10/11/2006 8:07:30 AM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
It's obvious that Russia want us to believe it's real, and they want to tell us what we should do about it. This thing is so transparent, it's ridiculous.
42 posted on 10/11/2006 8:42:48 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

BTW...How motivated do you think the N. Korean army is (let's leave Red China out of this for the moment)? I could see their elite troops being motivated to fight, but I can't see the regular army being motivated to just about anything except defect at the first available opportunity. Just curious to get your assessment on morale.


43 posted on 10/11/2006 8:46:22 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90
Clinton gave Russia our nuclear secrets (Design specs, missile specs, ect) as part of treaties he signed with them.

Total BS! Once again you don't have a clue regarding what you post. Clinton was responsible for giving the Chinese the ability to target their ICBM's with more precision.
44 posted on 10/11/2006 9:14:48 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Russia hasn'nt changed at all and can not be trusted. Its sad that some of the russians are proud that they support regimes like Iran and NK. They have no idea how idiotic and backwards they look in the civilized world. Russia at the present time can not be trust and the US,SK,Japan need to reinforce our alliance to deter any future agression from these thugs.


45 posted on 10/11/2006 9:22:59 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
Clinton was responsible for giving the Chinese the ability to target their ICBM's with more precision.

I believe you're right... but I KNOW Russia sent pilots to fly NKorean jet-fighters in 1950.

46 posted on 10/11/2006 9:32:07 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
I believe you're right... but I KNOW Russia sent pilots to fly NKorean jet-fighters in 1950.

The Soviets sent those fighter pilots. The Soviet Union fell in 1991.
47 posted on 10/11/2006 9:40:37 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

Yeah... wanna' sell some of that reefer?


48 posted on 10/11/2006 9:43:46 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
Really, some people use Clinton the way Napoleon used Snowball in Animal Farm, as a politically useful villain who is somehow responsible for every single thing that ever goes wrong.

The last thing conservatives want to do is obscure the record of Clinton's real damage under a mountain of nonsense.

49 posted on 10/11/2006 9:44:08 AM PDT by steve-b (It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

The idea might not be so far fetched but it's still stupid. You can't trust that kind of evil.


50 posted on 10/11/2006 9:49:03 AM PDT by ukie55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Care to explain VLADYYY HMMM????


51 posted on 10/11/2006 10:16:37 AM PDT by SevenofNine ("Step aside Jefe"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Not a chance. The Norks don't have the engineering capability to build that small a nuke. They have enough problems making one small and sturdy enough to fit on a ballistic missile.


52 posted on 10/11/2006 10:54:51 AM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I have a pocket nuke that I got from a box of Crackerjack. Lots of fun with toy soldiers!!

Note to any and all authorities: This is a sarcastic post. I do not possess nuclear weapons. Carry on!


53 posted on 10/11/2006 11:01:06 AM PDT by OldArmy94
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Oh, I see you believe the fall of the Soviet Union was a KGB conspiracy and not the result of Ronald Reagan's iron will.


54 posted on 10/11/2006 11:03:01 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

No... I just believe that Russia... will be Russia. It will take more than one generation of 'freedom'... for Russian's to come to terms with their brutal. yet astounding, history.


55 posted on 10/11/2006 11:20:46 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Fair enough, but you have never been there to see the freedoms Russians enjoy. I also suspect you are not really familiar with the truth regarding Chechnya. We have friends from there. My wife's nephew served 5 tours there and one in Dagestan in the Spetsnaz. Those poor Chechens were given fair warning and time to leave Grozny. They are so nice all captured Russians enjoy having their heads sawed off. They forgot to show that nice little benefit to Anna Polikovskaya.
56 posted on 10/11/2006 12:13:04 PM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I personally would appreciate a translation of the lower part, the drawing part, of the image you have posted. If you were to start at the tunnel entrance and when there are columns of pointer labels going from top to bottom would work for me.

I suspect that if the interior of the tunnel is 3 meters high then the width is much greater than it seems in the drawing. If this is not so then either the tunnel must have been filled in partially after the device was built in the tunnel end cavity or the device will fit through what appears to be a 3x1.5 meter opening.

The second possibility seems unlikely unless concrete pumping was used. The radius of the turns is interesting as well.

Unfortunately I am not up to speed on "P waves" but hope to be shortly.
57 posted on 10/11/2006 1:22:00 PM PDT by Iris7 (Dare to be pigheaded! Stubborn! "Tolerance" is not a virtue!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

In your #24 you think like an intelligence analyst. What you call "guessing" is an important factor when no high grade information is available.


58 posted on 10/11/2006 1:29:08 PM PDT by Iris7 (Dare to be pigheaded! Stubborn! "Tolerance" is not a virtue!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes

The Topel M missle uses a system similar to the MX ICBM system.


59 posted on 10/11/2006 2:34:30 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

RE: This design could disrupt P-wave

We see similar things in everyday designs - noise cancellation, innate sound deadening. If you can create what are known as destructive interference and resonance conditions, then P-wave amplitudes might be greatly reduced. The horizontal tunnel combined with engineered zigs and zags might have been a crude attempt at concealment.


60 posted on 10/11/2006 2:39:35 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson