Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Natural climate change periodically wipes out mammal species: study (Warming is routine)
PhysOrg ^ | October 11, 2006 | Staff

Posted on 10/11/2006 1:55:57 PM PDT by DaveLoneRanger

Climate change, naturally induced by tiny shifts in Earth's rotational axis and orbit, periodically wipes out species of mammals, a study published on Thursday says.

Palaeontologists have long puzzled over fossil records that, remarkably, suggest mammal species tend to last around two and a half million years before becoming extinct.

Climate experts and biologists led by Jan van Dam at the University of Utrecht in the Netherlands, overlaid a picture of species emergence and extinction with changes that occur in Earth's orbit and axis.

The Earth's orbit is not a perfect circle: it is slightly elliptical, and the ellipticality itself goes through cycles of change that span roughly 100,000 and 400,000 years.

Its axis, likewise, is not perfectly perpendicular but has a slight wobble, rather like a poorly-balanced child's top, which goes through cycles of 21,000 years.

In addition, the axis, as schoolbooks tell us, is also tilted, and this tilt also varies in a cycle of 41,000 years.

These three shifts in Earth's pattern of movement are relatively minor compared with those of other planets.

But they can greatly influence the amount of radiation -- heat and light -- which Earth receives from the Sun. The effect can be amplified, causing global cooling, affecting precipitation patterns and even creating Ice Ages in higher latitudes, when two or all the cycles peak together.

Van Dam's team looked at 132 species of mammal fossils recovered from three sites in Spain, in layers of soil that dated from 24.5 million years ago to 2.5 million years ago.

What they looked for was the fossilised teeth of rodents, mainly because these could be spotted and identified much quicker than the remains of other animals.

They found that rodent species bit the dust in two regular waves.

One wave of extinction was roughly every 2.4 million years or so and the other was about every million years or so, coinciding with extremes in the cycles of ellipticality, wobble and tilt.

These were not swift, massive die-outs of the kind that famously wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago, but rather a fadeout of species which could not cope with habitat loss or competition, especially when Ice Ages kicked in.

As they became extinct, other species emerged.

"At any given time, there would be around 15 (rodent) species in residence," van Dam told AFP. "During the extinction waves, about five or six species would disappear over a period of about 100,000 years or so."

The paper, which appears on Thursday in the British journal Nature, is confident that the species turnover among rodents also happened to other mammals and possibly other biological groups too.

Astronomical impact "provides a crucial missing piece in the puzzle" of regular species turnover, it says.

Previous research has also established that Earth's climate system can be affected by massive volcanic eruptions or the impact of an asteroid or comet. These can kick up so much dust that the planet receives less sunlight, and in turn plant species suffer.

In addition to natural factors, the world's climate system and its biodiversity are also being affected by the burning of fossil fuels.

Oil, gas and coal, and to a lesser degree agriculture, release carbon gases into the atmosphere, creating a "greenhouse effect" that traps solar radiation and causes Earth's surface temperature to warm.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: alarmism; alarmists; climatechange; environment; environmentalists; globalwarming; globalwarmingping; globullwarming; greenhousegas; panic; pollution; skyisfalling

1 posted on 10/11/2006 1:55:59 PM PDT by DaveLoneRanger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: texianyankee; JayB; ElkGroveDan; markman46; palmer; Bahbah; Paradox; FOG724; Mike Darancette; ...
(((GLOBAL WARMING PING)))



You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.
Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me
Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

2 posted on 10/11/2006 1:56:26 PM PDT by DaveLoneRanger (Lord, help me to be the Christian conservative that liberals fear I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

How much were these scam artist paid to state the obvious?


3 posted on 10/11/2006 1:59:21 PM PDT by Jaysun (Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
OMG! We are all going to die!

I guess the DemocRATS will have to take the long view.

4 posted on 10/11/2006 2:01:40 PM PDT by Agent Smith (Fallujah delenda est. (I wish))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
This is something I find interesting about enviro-freaks. They're all die-hard evolutionists, right? Not a creationist among them? Well, there are probably a few Gaians, but whatever.

Anyway, for believing in evolution, they sure are squeamish about species going extinct.

5 posted on 10/11/2006 2:06:28 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (Mark 5:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
How much were these scam artist[sic] paid to state the obvious?

But jeepers, I thought it was obvious that the Earth was intelligently designed to be perfectly suited for life! Now you tell me that the obvious thing is that the Earth is not perfectly suited for life; that its orbit is chaotic enough that whole species of mammals go extinct every 2.5 million years on average.

So, the obvious thing is that the Earth is not intelligently designed to be perfectly suited for life, then? So the Anthropic Principle is obviously not valid? OK, gotcha.

6 posted on 10/11/2006 2:39:11 PM PDT by jennyp (There's ALWAYS time for jibber jabber!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Jaysun
You're more full of sh*t than a Mexican portable potty in front of a bran muffin factory. Who said that being "perfectly suited for (all) life" is what the creator intended? You fool. Change your ignorant ways before it's too late.

Ah, but that's why creationism is so compelling. If the world is perfectly suited for life, then it must have been created. If it's naturally hostile to life, then we must have been created. QED.

8 posted on 10/11/2006 4:25:58 PM PDT by jennyp (There's ALWAYS time for jibber jabber!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Meltdown ===> Placemarker <===
9 posted on 10/11/2006 4:34:32 PM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

Are liberals mammals?


10 posted on 10/11/2006 4:34:57 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jennyp

Jenny, glad that you put the quote in your post, as the initial post was deleted...what some people say, just amazes me...


11 posted on 10/11/2006 5:08:16 PM PDT by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
But jeepers, I thought it was obvious that the Earth was intelligently designed to be perfectly suited for life! Now you tell me that the obvious thing is that the Earth is not perfectly suited for life; that its orbit is chaotic enough that whole species of mammals go extinct every 2.5 million years on average.

The periodic culling of species is probably good for the overall system. Notice that these cycles do not kill off all the species.

It would be interesting to correlate the cycles with emergence of new species as well as extinction of old ones.

12 posted on 10/11/2006 5:37:27 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Ah, but that's why creationism is so compelling. If the world is perfectly suited for life, then it must have been created. If it's naturally hostile to life, then we must have been created. QED.

Begone.
13 posted on 10/11/2006 5:49:21 PM PDT by Jaysun (Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Ah, but that's why creationism is so compelling. If the world is perfectly suited for life, then it must have been created.

Maybe the universe always existed and therefore never had a beginning. -Tom

14 posted on 10/11/2006 5:56:14 PM PDT by Capt. Tom (Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb Republicans - Capt. Tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
Are liberals mammals?

Most of 'em. This one certainly appears to be:

Maybe not old Lizard Face Chuckie Schumer though.


15 posted on 10/11/2006 5:58:12 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
Are liberals mammals?

"snicker"

16 posted on 10/11/2006 6:04:20 PM PDT by Trteamer ( (Eat Meat, Wear Fur, Own Guns, FReep Leftists, Drive an SUV, Drill A.N.W.R., Drill the Gulf, Vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson