The Weather Underground
Posted on 10/12/2006 12:00:49 AM PDT by tcrlaf
A U.S. based environmental magazine that both former Vice President Al Gore (http://gristmill.grist.org/print/2006/9/19/11408/1106?show_comments=no ) and PBS newsman Bill Moyers, for his October 11th global warming edition of “Moyers on America” titled “Is God Green?” have deemed respectable enough to grant one-on-one interviews to promote their projects, is now advocating Nuremberg-style war crimes trials for skeptics of human caused catastrophic global warming.
Grist Magazine’s staff writer David Roberts called for the Nuremberg-style trials for the “bastards” who were members of what he termed the global warming “denial industry.”
Roberts wrote in the online publication on September 19, 2006, "When we've finally gotten serious about global warming, when the impacts are really hitting us and we're in a full worldwide scramble to minimize the damage, we should have war crimes trials for these bastards -- some sort of climate Nuremberg.”
(Snip) The article Global Warming: The Chilling Effect On Free Speech last week in Spiked Online addresses this new found penchant by environmentalists and some media members to charge skeptics of human caused catastrophic global warming with “crimes against humanity” and urge Nuremberg-style prosecution of them.
(Links removed from text)
(Excerpt) Read more at epw.senate.gov ...
Now it's a "Crime Against Humanity" if you don't buy into the Liberal-Approved Global Warming Script....
So Al Gore of the Democratic Party promotes trials and imprisonment and possibly execution if you don't believe in his globull excretment...Please come and get me.
If you read who beleives in man made global warming, you'll find "scientists". Those who disagree are "climatologists". Weatherman cannot predict what the weather will be five days in advance. But scientists can predict the weather years in advance. How many hurricanes have we had this year, Albore?
I only wish it was....
I read MANY articles in the Mid-80's that stated that Socialism's hope for the future lay in co-opting the Radical World Environmental Movement, after the Fall of the Soviet Union...
After all, only a Global Socialist Dictatorship would truly have the POWER to save the Planet from itself...
You are starting to see that come to fruition now, as the 60's/70's environmentalists are now in thier 60/70's, rich, and powerful...
1.)Take all the guns away.
You've lost already.
But will they put panties on my head if I don't confess?
I remember reading somewhere in the mid-80's that "Environmentalism is the New Socialism". I don't remember where that quote came from though...
Basicly it stated that World Domination by Communist Ideology could only happen now though the justification of "Saving Ourselves", and Radical Environmentalism would be the vehicle for it...
Here is a blurb from a website called "Socialist Action":
Introduction: We stand firmly in opposition to the destruction of the environment.
We believe that the scourge of pollution, depletion of resources and degradation of our natural environment is primarily the result of the reckless policies of profit driven capitalism, and the shortsighted consumerism that it fosters.
We believe that under socialism - through a rational, democratically controlled planned economy - we will be able to make decisions that can stop and reverse the destruction of the environment.
We support efforts to save what remains of our natural environment, re-tool industry to use sustainable fuels, resources and production practices, and to break down the artificial and debilitating divisions between the labor and environmental movements.
Below is a list of articles and resolutions from Socialist Action, YSA and the Fourth International, as well as a collection of links to other websites with information about ecology and the environmental movement. "
To use a Babs Striesand euphemism, "Shut the f---up".
I didn't expect a bloody inquisition.
No, he was just interviewed by the rag.
This is very worrying and relys on the oldest trick in the book that when you indoctrinate people with fear then you have control over them.
The earth has been warming and coiling for millions of years and the default in the current epoch is 90% glacial and 10% interglacial. There may be good arguments suggesting AGW playing a role but this whole issue now is about shutting down debate altogether which is about as dangerous as it can get!!...
If these psychophant liberals have their way, then heaven help us.....run to the hills!!!
Al Gore and Bill Moyers should both live in a tepee, with no campfire alowed. If it gets too cold, they can rub their legs together like crickets.
Watermelons. Green on the outside. Red on the inside. Environmentalism is the new home for rabid communists.
I dislike the term environmentalism being applied to such people - I consider myself an environmentalist; I want to see the environment sustained so future generations can enjoy what we have.
On the other hand, I certainly don't support propaganda which hasn't been proved one way or the other. Cutting down on oil, yes. (But that's more so that when we eventually run out, it doesn't cause another Great Depression). Forcing countries to adapt to standards, while ruining people's lives because of something that is still up in the air? Hell, no.
Scary stuff. It won't end with the environmental issue either. As we know from the way these people operate, often through fear, intimidation, and outright violence, we could see all kinds of "re-education" institutions appear if they were ever to obtain complete power.
This is why we have the right to bear arms. Should these wackos continue with their threats, our duties as citizens in the US will have a clear directive.
My point, exactly! So far, computer models have predicted more hurricanes (boy, 2006 sure was a doozy), but since those same computers can't tell me what the weather will be on my birthday in 2 months, why should I believe they can predict what the temperature will be in 10,20, 50, 100, 1000 years from now.
There are too many variables in the climate to predict anything except that the sun will rise in the morning and set in the evening....any "scientist" with a double-digit IQ knows this....
Imagine a world with Algore as president...too scary to even comtemplate.
Do they stand you up against a wall and make you eat pink tofu while wearing earth shoes? OUCH!
Al Gore, a communist in diguise. These people are truly warped, they are so warped that they are a danger to society.
Holy Peer Review, Batman, why not just hold an Inquisition to root out the heretics?
The Weather Underground
"the “bastards” who were members of what he termed the global warming “denial industry.”"
There's that Liberal "projection" again. Projecting their conspiracy on the Conservatives. The bastards are the active promoters of a tooth-fairy-myth called human-induced global warming, in order to hurt freedom, industry and prosperity.
An amazing aspect of it is man's arrogance in thinking he can control the weather!
Gaia dumped 4 inches of white, cold global warming on my house last night.
The weatherguy predicts 4 to 8 more inches of global warming today. And another 4 to 8 inches of anthropomorphic warming tomorrow.
My tomato plants don't like this...
When Convenient Opinion meets No Controlling Legal Authority, dictators arise.
This isn't socialist. This is pure Communism.
Show trials and intimidation are part and parcel of it.
What next? Gulags?
What is the difference between this and a jihadist campaign to oppress those who will not accept Islam?
I do have a problem when environmentalists use endangered species laws to prevent a private property owner from developing or using his property. I have a big problem when environmentalists use fake "scientific" reports to damage national security. I object when the "anti nuke" people block the construction of nuclear power plants that could replace fossils fuels for electric generation and in the same breath whine about air pollution from fossil fuels. Hypocrits.
I see you've bought into the phrase "sustainable". Realize that some of the environmental whackos advocate killing off the human population to about 5 million people so the environment will be "sustainable" and those 5 million can exist like cavemen with subsistence farming. Put that phrase under close scrutiny so you fully comprehend what the user really means. Sometimes it is just mindless parroting of a buzzword. Sometimes it belies ulterior motives.
Hey Roberts. I'm a global warming denier. Come and get me you m***** f*****!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.