Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraqi Documents: Projects to Rebuild Saddam Nuclear Facilities (Translation)
Pentagon/FMSO website for Iraq Pre-war documents http://70.168.46.200/ ^ | October 12 2006 | jveritas

Posted on 10/12/2006 8:11:36 AM PDT by jveritas

Documents CMPC-2004-003978.pdf and CMPC-2004-002191.pdf contains memos dated from 1999 to 2001 that talk about projects sponsored by the Iraqi Atomic Nuclear Agency to rebuild some of their nuclear facilities and equipments. All the projects were dated after the UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in December 1998. These facilities and equipments were part of Iraq clandestine nuclear weapon program before the 1991 Gulf War and they were destroyed by the bombing and some were dismantled by the UN weapon inspector. Rebuilding these nuclear facilities and equipments was totally prohibited per the UN sanctions. The facilities include rebuilding Iraq Radioactive Waste Treatment Station (RWTS) that was destroyed by bombing during operation Desert Storm in 1991. Another project was to rebuild the RadioChemistry laboratories. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) the RWTS and the RadioChemistry Laboratories were part of Iraq clandestine nuclear program (http://www.iraqwatch.org/un/IAEA/s-1997-779-att-3.htm, see section 3.4 of the link). Document CMCP-2004-003978 there is a project by the Iraq Atomic Agency to fix “Furnaces” from the Dicosa brand. Nuclear facilities require very specialized “furnaces” and this type of furnaces is prohibited according to the UN (http://www.iraqwatch.org/un/IAEA/s-1995-215.htm, see point 57 and 58).

Beginning of partial translation of page 31 of CMPC-2004-003978

In the Name of God the Most merciful the Most Compassionate

The Republic of Iraq

The Iraqi Atomic Energy Agency

Number: 22/7897

Date: 28/9/1999

Administrative Order

Number 6335

Based on the approval of Mr. Chairman of the Agency on 25/9/1999 and the requirement for the job it was decided:

1. The execution of the RWTS project per the direct implementation.

2. The Chairman of the engineering department will be allowed the power of buying and contracting to implement the project and in one single offer up to one million Dinars.

4. The committee of purchasing and offers analysis in the engineering department will execute all the works related to the project.

Signature

Naaem Hussein Muhawesh

The director of Human resources.

28/9/99

End of partial translation of page 31 of CMPC-2004-003978

Beginning of translation of page 10 of CMPC-2004-003978

In the Name of God the Most merciful the Most Compassionate

The Iraqi Atomic Energy Agency, Engineering department

Number: 40/6/228

Date: 4/3/2001

Administrative Order

Number 9

1. A Committee will be formed to fix the Dicosa Furnaces from the gentlemen whose names are listed below and that a work plan will be submitted three weak from the above date.

Dia’a Jalil Hussein (Chairman of the Committee), Farouk Mohamad Saleh (member), Adnan Salim Jerjeis (member), Hadi Ibrahim Jasem (member), Hussein Naif Abed (member), Said Minjel Ayez (member), Saharook Abed Allah Abdan (member)

2. Mr. Chairman of the committee will be allowed the privileges of the Finance department chairman for the purpose of executing the project.

Signature

Dr. Hisham Mahmood Ahmad

Engineering Department Chairman

End of translation of page10 of CMPC-2004-003978

Beginning of translation of page of CMPC-2004-002191

In the Name of God the Most merciful the Most Compassionate

The Iraqi Atomic Energy Agency, Chemistry and Solutions Department

Number: 5000/19/1749

Date: 18/9/2002

To: The Engineering Department

Subject: The Radio-Chemistry Laboratories

We confirm that our letter numbered 5000/1311 on 13/7/2002 regarding the allocation of required funds to rehabilitate the administration annex of the Radio-Chemistry Laboratories including the shaded roofs and according to the prepared design and descriptions and at a cost of 34 million Dinars.

Until now this work did not start despite the allocation of funds two months ago in addition to the unaccomplished detailed design for the Radio-Chemistry Project.

We would like to point to paragraph (3) from our letter above where the plan to complete the rehabilitation of the administration annex and detailed design for the Radio-Chemistry project before the end of the year 2002 and according to this year investment plan for the Chemistry Department.

We hope to receive the schedule to accomplish the work with the possible speed and not to exceed the end of the year 2002.

With regards…

Signature

Dr. Hisham Mahmood Ahmad

Chemistry and Solutions department Chairman

Date: 18/9/2002


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: onfreep; prewardocs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-60 next last

1 posted on 10/12/2006 8:11:36 AM PDT by jveritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething

PING


2 posted on 10/12/2006 8:12:12 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thank you for your continuing effort.


3 posted on 10/12/2006 8:15:05 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

JV, you are STILL a Great American!


4 posted on 10/12/2006 8:16:19 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; Chena; Valin; M. Thatcher; DocRock; Calpernia; Madame Dufarge; Txsleuth; Peach; ...
Thanks, pinging and then reading.

Iraqi Documents: Projects to Rebuild Saddam Nuclear Facilities (Translation)

Release/Translation of Classified PreWar Docs ping. If you want to be added or removed to the ping list, please Freepmail me.

Please add the keyword prewardocs to any articles pertaining to this subject.

Operation Get The Truth Out

Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents

Documents from the Harmony Database

jveritas’s blog

An Interview With a Citizen Translator and American Hero

5 posted on 10/12/2006 8:16:56 AM PDT by eyespysomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; gardencatz

BTTT and a ping!


6 posted on 10/12/2006 8:18:37 AM PDT by KJC1 (Kim Jong Il has a stash of 10,000 bottles of Scotch, partying while his people starve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Wonderful work as always.

Does anyone actually believe that if there had been no invasion of Iraq and Saddam were still in power, that he would NOT have a full-bore nuclear bomb program right now to compete with that of Iran?

And of course this Iraqi nuclear program would be called by Democrats "yet another Bush administration failure."


7 posted on 10/12/2006 8:19:04 AM PDT by denydenydeny ("We have always been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be detested in France"--Wellington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Further proof that Iraq would be a major thorn in our side without the removal of the Hussein government.

Thanks for the translation.


8 posted on 10/12/2006 8:21:50 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny
Does anyone actually believe that if there had been no invasion of Iraq and Saddam were still in power, that he would NOT have a full-bore nuclear bomb program right now to compete with that of Iran?

Exactly. Saddam was absolutely paranoid with Iran attacking them with Chemical weapons or nuclear weapons so Saddam would not possibly just take a defensive position in this case without being able to hit back with WMD. It was the Chemical Weapons used by Iraq against Iran that made them able to stand against the Iranians and saved Saddam regime during the Iran-Iraq war from 1980 to 1988.

9 posted on 10/12/2006 8:38:09 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
If a country like North Korea can build nuke(s) as cash strapped as it is, what about a country like Iraq under Saddam Hussein, who had extra money to build palaces all over the country with its huge oil revenues?

Thanks for more evidence that Saddam was going for the Mother Lode.

Now I am hearing from my liberal friends that yes Saddam had WMDs, and Bush knew that they were moved out two months before the invasion. When I point out that as easily as they were moved out, they could be moved back in, all of a sudden they go stuck on stupid and start the name calling. Just like you to know.
10 posted on 10/12/2006 8:48:08 AM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething; jveritas

jveritas. You are in a lot of trouble! Don't you know that Saddam never had any interest in nuclear weapons? The NY Times said so and they never lie! So HOW DARE YOU contradict them with these silly little facts! If you don't stop I'm going to be forced to report you to THEM.


11 posted on 10/12/2006 8:48:10 AM PDT by Valin (http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Important note at the top of the source web page:
At the request of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the US Army Foreign Military Studies Office has created this portal to provide the general public with access to unclassified documents and media captured during Operation Iraqi Freedom. The US Government has made no determination regarding the authenticity of the documents, validity or factual accuracy of the information contained therein, or the quality of any translations, when available. The ODNI press release and public affairs contact information is available at http://www.odni.gov/

12 posted on 10/12/2006 8:49:22 AM PDT by heavy7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

I know that I am in big trouble for challenging the lies of liberals and their media :) but I love this kind of troubles :)


13 posted on 10/12/2006 8:50:39 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46
I recall reading that Saddam was something like 3 months away from getting rid of the sanctions when we invaded. As I recall the French & Russians were going to get rid of it.
14 posted on 10/12/2006 8:50:49 AM PDT by Valin (http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: heavy7

It is a typical legal disclaimer. There is much lower percentage of fake documents among the millions if Iraqi documents than there are fake news stories and lies printed daily by the liberal media.


15 posted on 10/12/2006 8:52:29 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

You're a baaaad person! I just hope I don't get in trouble for reading these.


16 posted on 10/12/2006 8:52:36 AM PDT by Valin (http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething; jveritas
Thanks for the ping!

You are getting closer J! Tick Tock
Great work by a great American! Thank you so much for your continued dedication to uncovering the lies of the *corrupt regime.

* Saddam, DemonRATS, ENEMEDIA

17 posted on 10/12/2006 8:59:55 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
There is much lower percentage of fake documents among the millions if Iraqi documents than there are fake news stories and lies printed daily by the liberal media.

And another home run, as jveritas hits it outta the park! ;*)

18 posted on 10/12/2006 9:01:30 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thank you j! The hits just keep on coming!


19 posted on 10/12/2006 9:03:02 AM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heavy7
Hello heavy7, and welcome to FR. The disclaimer has been discussed in much length in the many threads on these documents.

Please feel free to peruse the previous PreWarDoc threads by following this link:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=prewardocs
20 posted on 10/12/2006 9:04:00 AM PDT by eyespysomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: heavy7

Retread or is this your first trolling attempt?


21 posted on 10/12/2006 9:13:39 AM PDT by BJClinton (Celebrate diversity: re-elect Congressman Foley!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
It is a typical legal disclaimer. There is much lower percentage of fake documents among the millions if Iraqi documents than there are fake news stories and lies printed daily by the liberal media.
What is the error rate from documents on this site? Are there any patters as to what types of documents are more reliable?
22 posted on 10/12/2006 9:15:32 AM PDT by heavy7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; eyespysomething

More good work and more evidence that the butcher wasn't just sitting back on his hands and making nice.

Maybe one day the looney left will come to realize that he was trying to rebuild his WMD that he had already used to kill thousands, but I doubt it.


23 posted on 10/12/2006 9:38:14 AM PDT by jazusamo (DIANA IREY for Congress, PA 12th District: Retire murtha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: heavy7
So far, I have read over 40,000 pages of Iraqi documents and only one document ( few pages) sound suspicious.
24 posted on 10/12/2006 10:01:01 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody
When going against the liberal media it is an easy task to hit it out of the park :)
25 posted on 10/12/2006 10:04:01 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

But Saddam did not have an atomic bomb when we invaded therefore he was not a danger and Bush lied (Left wing loon opining) :)


26 posted on 10/12/2006 10:05:58 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; Admin Moderator

Activism/Chapters not!


27 posted on 10/12/2006 10:07:45 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

At least some of your liberal friends admit Saddam had WMD, that is some progress.


28 posted on 10/12/2006 10:08:05 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kidd

After 9/11, we simply could not afford to live with Saddam regime, these documents prove it.


29 posted on 10/12/2006 10:09:00 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Nice work as always. Imagine if Saddamn was testing Nuclear Weapons?

Pray for W and Our Troops


30 posted on 10/12/2006 10:10:22 AM PDT by bray (Voting for the Rats is Suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle; A.Hun
Just doing my little duty my fellow freepers.
31 posted on 10/12/2006 10:11:08 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
So far, I have read over 40,000 pages of Iraqi documents...

You deserve the respect and admiration of all Americans for the great effort you have put in to uncover the truth. Thanks!

32 posted on 10/12/2006 10:13:27 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

bttt


33 posted on 10/12/2006 10:14:25 AM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

Thank you.


34 posted on 10/12/2006 10:17:30 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bray
Imagine if Saddamn was testing Nuclear Weapons?

It would have been a nightmare that exceeds our imagination. The removal of Saddam regime was a great service for the US, Iraq, the world, and all of humanity.

35 posted on 10/12/2006 10:22:00 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thanks for your work. I just sent the documents and translation to the chief editor to a major national newspaper.


36 posted on 10/12/2006 10:22:57 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Thank you for helping in getting the truth out.


37 posted on 10/12/2006 10:25:51 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

"So far, I have read over 40,000 pages of Iraqi documents and only one document ( few pages) sound suspicious."

I thought it looked a little suspicious that the first document was numbered 1, 2, 4. What happened to #3?


38 posted on 10/12/2006 10:27:43 AM PDT by Tarantulas ( Illegal immigration - the trojan horse that's treated like a sacred cow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

LOL! Well that is certainly true, but you are certainly a great batter. ;*)


39 posted on 10/12/2006 10:39:33 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Is his more evidence that the 911 commission and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence ignored or refused to recognize?


40 posted on 10/12/2006 10:44:06 AM PDT by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

When are these translations going to be picked up by someone? Has at least Rush or Sean talked about them? What about some more local conservative talkers?

The more these are translated, the more the original case for war is justified.


41 posted on 10/12/2006 10:47:24 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarantulas

I skipped the translation of # 3 but it is there, that is why I called it partial translation.


42 posted on 10/12/2006 10:47:41 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven

I am also disappointed with our side of the media because they do not care about these very important documents.


43 posted on 10/12/2006 10:48:44 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr

The 9/11 commission and the democrats + 3 Rinos on the Senate Intelligence Committee do care about the truth, they just want to bash the President and hide the facts and truth.


44 posted on 10/12/2006 10:50:17 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven

I talked about on air at WRKO 68 AM Boston with the guys from punditreview

http://www.punditreview.com/2006/06/29/retired-lt-col-ralph-peters-on-pundit-review-radio/


45 posted on 10/12/2006 10:54:25 AM PDT by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Running On Empty

Marking


46 posted on 10/12/2006 10:56:11 AM PDT by Running On Empty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Well, it is greatly appreciated jveritas.


47 posted on 10/12/2006 11:19:01 AM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr

Good for you! Did they seem interested?


48 posted on 10/12/2006 11:32:38 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr

do care = do not care.


49 posted on 10/12/2006 11:33:05 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thanks very much, jveritas. BTTT!


50 posted on 10/12/2006 2:10:16 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson