Skip to comments.SEE RAHM [Emanuel] DANCE-THE CLINTON-FOLEY NEXUS: A THEORY part 2
Posted on 10/15/2006 9:08:14 AM PDT by Mia T
She wouldn't want to do that with me. I'd grab her by the cankles!
no way Hillary can go into 2008 with Reid and Pelosi in the leadership--ken5050
Maybe it was hillary clinton who fed the Reid story to the AP. The timing, especially, was curious, given the AP's leftist sensibilities. Seems hillary would be killing 2 birds with one stone with that one....
Wow, never made the connection before about Foley and the FBI files.
A great catch presented in a media masterpiece!
I checked the Filegate list of names. There were a couple of 'Foleys,' but not a 'Mark.'
My point about Filegate is this: It shows a pattern of dysfunctional and criminal behavior consistent with the Foley hit.
A compelling argument to vote D this election.
thanx Stallone. :)
But in order to comply with the Constitution, the appropriation couldn't be for any longer than two years. We'd have to issue our troops two years' worth of ammunition, rations, and fuel, to outlast the 'Rats.
"....it is unclear exactly when the clintons amassed their fortune..."
Mia...mash here for this series if you haven't ever read it....http://www.aci.net/KALLISTE/part1.htm
Rahm, Howard Wolfson, Carville, Begala, Mandy Grunwald , Clintinoids one and all are going to remain a part of the American landscape until Hillary and Bill are out.
Isn't everyone sick of a re-run of The Arkansas Grifters? When do these people get to be "old news" that turns everybody off?
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006
So, basically, you are saying the Clintons orchestrated the scandal to get the Clintons screw up with bin Laden and other national security issues off the front page. If true, they must have been truly desperate.
|Isn't everyone sick of a re-run of The Arkansas Grifters? When do these people get to be "old news" that turns everybody off?--Cincinna
I think the Ds would LOVE to dump her. Exactly WHO are her supporters, anyway? I don't see them. Do you?
'HILLARY'S BIGGEST PROBLEM... SHE'S OLD NEWS'
Oh yes, the professional politicians hold on to their power partly by convincing voters (and themselves) that they are sacrificing so much in order to engage in "public service" - and then proceed to vote themselves huge benefits from the public till; gradually rationalizing just how much their so-called sacrifice benefits us peasants, their constituency, the great unwashed. They actually have and keep the power to wangle the laws to where they have a strangle hold on power in perpetuity.
The founders of this country had some integrity, serving very limited terms in public service and then going back to work in real life so they wouldn't be tempted to become corrupt. They proceeded to sternly advise the disallowance of career politicians who get ensconced, then corrupted into voting themselves privileges and largesse from taxation. Now, the likes of Teddy Kennedy, and others, are so ensconced in "public service" that they have never or rarely ever held a real job in their lives. Sad to say, the average voter in America is not very well educated in American history with this truth about the founding fathers pounded into their heads just as hard as a list of dates for some obscure happenings of little relevance. I know I wasn't educated all that well in public school on these matters, but experience has opened my eyes. This does not seem to be the case, especially amongst people who do not appear to have to actually live in the real world themselves.
thanx mo. (I was trying to be ironic. I guess I was too subtle. ;) )
Yes, they were desperate.
As I explained above in post 55, my thinking (with additions) is this:
The clinton machine was planning to spring the Foley hit closer to the election to maximize its effect and minimize the probability of mitigation by the GOP or random events.
But then "The Path to 9/11" and Chris Wallace started the clinton 9/11 malpractice and malfeasance story... and clinton's stupid actions and reactions to each only caused the story to grow. Exponentially.
THIS THREATENED TO SHATTER NOT ONLY HILLARY'S ELECTORAL HOPES, BUT ALSO CLINTON'S 'LEGACY' (even if it is in his own mind only).
Panic gripped the clinton camp. The clintons decided to release the Foley hit piece early. They had nothing else to stop the hemorrhaging and to hell with a Democrat majority.
(As a matter of fact, an argument can be made that it would be better for hillary in 2008 if the Ds do NOT win control of either house.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.