Posted on 10/16/2006 2:09:02 PM PDT by weegee
Why should unmarried people be able to adopt children who are unrelated to them? There are lots of married couples on lists to adopt children.
Funny story.
Montrose is getting to expensive for some gays. Some are moving to Westbury.
Liberals always move to non-liberal locals and preceed to try to screw it up. They try to institute the same failed policies like rent control that screwed up the cities they are from.
Sick f**ks.
private adoptions. essentialy the lawyer is selling a baby.
If you want to stop this put a cap on attorney fees for adoptions.
Homosexuals sometimes evangelize. Reminds men of something Jesus said:
"You travel sea and land to make one convert, and when he is made, you make him two times more the child of hell than yourselves." Matthew 23:15
Why should unmarried people be able to adopt children who are unrelated to them? There are lots of married couples on lists to adopt children.
Because lesbians and homosexual adopt the black, hispanic and biracial babies and the older children that white couples won't look at.
And because state social services agencies are overwhelmingly staffed by lesbians and homosexuals.
They are having the babies that straight Americans won't have.
Settling in Houston has nothing to do with it being a great place to raise a child. It is all about the sexual desires of the two cretins ... and Montrose is there to supply all of their needs. The children are nothing more than accessories to help them look normal.
More evidence that the Houston Comical is pushing the liberal agenda of it's San Fran-sicko masters.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Click FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search for a list of all related articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
April, who graduated from high school a year early in May, said that in retrospect, having two fathers has "made me a stronger and more mature person."
IOW, having two homosexual "fathers" is BETTER than having a normal father and mother!
Wait a minute, so the baby is the sibling of one of them??? WOW this is getting kookier by the minute.
At worst she'll grow up gay, At best she'll grow up dangerously promiscuous as she seeks to find the father's love that she was denied by her 'mothers'.
Either way her life has been destroyed. Her 'mothers' should be horsewhipped for the damage they've done (and are doing) to her.
The third law of homosexuality:
Any exposure of children to homosexual behavior is child abuse
Because lesbians and homosexual adopt the black, hispanic and biracial babies and the older children that white couples won't look at.
I know lots of white married couples who've adopted black, hispanic, asian, and older kids. Why should a child be sentenced to a life of being abused when married couples are looking to adopt?
And because state social services agencies are overwhelmingly staffed by lesbians and homosexuals.
Which is why the state should get out of the baby selling business. Any organization staffed by the mentally ill needs to be closed.
It's amazing. An area becomes good for raising children BECAUSE of it's conservatism and the liberals try to invade and destroy. Why don't they stay in san franscisco and massachusettes? Why do they have to invade our cities. (I swear they are like the plague).
(Note that they are more than welcome to move to the better areas once they have repented of their sin and abandoned their perversion. But we don't want them to bring their moral cesspool with them.)
"I know lots of white married couples who've adopted black, hispanic, asian, and older kids."
Many white couples have adopted other race kids but not many adopt black kids. Asians? South Americans? No problem.
US Blacks?
Forget about it.
"Which is why the state should get out of the baby selling business. Any organization staffed by the mentally ill needs to be closed."
I am not arguing with you there!
Forget about it.
I know two couples that have and some more that were not allowed to because they weren't black. There are enough normal couples willing to adopt any child that no child should ever have to be sold into sexual perversion
I know two couples that have and some more that were not allowed to because they weren't black. There are enough normal couples willing to adopt any child that no child should ever have to be sold into sexual perversion
Not in the past 15 years!
I have worked with adoption agencies and believe me they have a difficult time placing black children as whites trample over the poor little ones on their way out to get their Asian or South American trophy.
It gets worse and worse, as the homo agenda is pushed deeper and deeper into mainstream culture.
You are right about it being like a plague. The poison that effects normal people when they are convinced that it's ok and a good thing for homos to adopt children.
It's a hiding of the obvious facts of homosexuality under the carpet to achieve liberal 'inclusiveness' for all... some ridiculous 'equality' which gives homo perversion some 'rights' to shove it's head into every place it can corrupt.
Did you happen to work for an outfit ON West Gray??
(I did.... Back in the dark ages! ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.