Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI Yet to Find Evidence of Foley-Page Sexual Contact
ABC ^ | October 18, 2006 | Brian Ross

Posted on 10/18/2006 8:14:46 AM PDT by xtinct

After interviewing some 40 former congressional pages, FBI agents have yet to turn up any evidence of direct sexual contact between underage pages and former Congressman Mark Foley.

Instead, according to law enforcement officials and several former pages, a pattern is emerging of seduction by Foley that began when the boys were 16 and 17. In cases where actual sex followed, it was not until the boys were at the legal age of 18.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.abcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: foley; gerrystudds; page
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last

1 posted on 10/18/2006 8:14:48 AM PDT by xtinct
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xtinct
It appears he may have kept his perverted tendencies in check.

Maybe he really is just a creep, not a criminal.

2 posted on 10/18/2006 8:16:41 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
Instead, according to law enforcement officials and several former pages, a pattern is emerging of seduction by Foley that began when the boys were 16 and 17. In cases where actual sex followed, it was not until the boys were at the legal age of 18.

Still sick if Foley used the page program as a recruiting center for future sex partners. Kind of like a President using the intern program for sex partners.

3 posted on 10/18/2006 8:17:05 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

It appears he didn't lie about it under oath either nor did he use the power of his office to obstruct justice.


4 posted on 10/18/2006 8:17:27 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dead

Now, if he were a Democrat...


5 posted on 10/18/2006 8:17:31 AM PDT by Paloma_55 (I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

Foley is different from that "proud" Democrat fag who is being worshipped by Democrats how?


6 posted on 10/18/2006 8:18:22 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary (Bukhari:V1B1N6 “Just issue orders to kill every Jew in the country.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55
Now, if he were a Democrat...

Exactly. This would be a "politically motivated witch hunt".

7 posted on 10/18/2006 8:18:45 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

They're too busy with Weldon's daughter...


8 posted on 10/18/2006 8:18:54 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

Nasty...


9 posted on 10/18/2006 8:19:03 AM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
Appears to be a case of consenual sex between two adult men.

Talk about invasion of privacy!!!

10 posted on 10/18/2006 8:19:16 AM PDT by xtinct (I was the next door neighbor kid's imaginary friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

He knew what he did wrong, resigned and sought help.


11 posted on 10/18/2006 8:19:26 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

I understand the Feds may have found some Foley photo albums with some potentially damaging evidence, but so far they've been useless since all the pages are stuck together...


12 posted on 10/18/2006 8:20:02 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: xtinct

So, when is the lamestream media going to admit that despite Foley's perversions, he didn't actually break any laws?


14 posted on 10/18/2006 8:21:46 AM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFA-Michigan; AliVeritas; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; Balke; BigFinn; BlackElk; BlessedBeGod; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Click FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search for a list of all related articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

15 posted on 10/18/2006 8:22:57 AM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

It doesn't matter. This guy could end up being the victim of mistaken identity or was set up the bomb by a spook from the Dem ranks. Of course I don't think this is the case but the fact of the matter is the Democrats have decided to embark on the Richard Jewell/ Mark Carr strategy. Toss up rumor and innuendo and let the compliant and hysterical 24/7 media take it from there. If the person is vindicated the media will make note of this in a 6pt font note on the margin of the paper.


16 posted on 10/18/2006 8:23:06 AM PDT by kinghorse (I calls them like I sees them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

"The Foley Story" is a typical media creation in that it now has nothing to do with facts. You just say "The Foley Scandal" and people are supposed to shriek in horror. The real Foley Scandal pretty much ended where it began - with his resignation. But Harry Reid is still in office.


17 posted on 10/18/2006 8:23:17 AM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
From the article:

"He spotted me when I was a page and set the hook while I was still in high school," one former page told ABC News. "He didn't reel me in until he showed up at my college campus on a congressional visit. We had sex," said the page, who has been interviewed by the FBI."

I don't understand what's going on. It's not like he was raping them. It's apparently consensual. They were of legal age. When I was 18 I knew the difference between men and women. These guys he was hitting on were homosexuals.

I don't like it, but to be fair why don't we start checking into the sexual habits and pickup lines of every homosexual Demoncrat in congress?

18 posted on 10/18/2006 8:23:21 AM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

He should join NAMBLA and the Democrats would LOVE him!! Or maybe he could become a Gay Boy Scout LEADER and they would ADORE him!!!!


19 posted on 10/18/2006 8:23:32 AM PDT by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

LOL! It does sound like Foley was similar to Clinton who had his own mental list of what was acceptable in anticipation of future testimony.


20 posted on 10/18/2006 8:23:56 AM PDT by aynrandfreak (Islam came up with "Zero" to describe the rest of their creative output)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
Yes, having anal sex with Democrats is indeed wrong and he should seek help. Why aren't these ex pages being identified so the public can judge if there was inappropriate behavior on their part? After all, they were obviously "gay" while they were sharing dorm rooms with other pages- before they turned 18.
21 posted on 10/18/2006 8:24:14 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary (Bukhari:V1B1N6 “Just issue orders to kill every Jew in the country.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dead

This was known at day 3 of this over a week ago. Only the AP implied that pages were under 18.


22 posted on 10/18/2006 8:25:06 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

It may not be legal.


23 posted on 10/18/2006 8:26:11 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
Foley resigned.
Studds won reelection and was rewarded by his party with a committee chair. Q: Foley or Studds. Which one had sex with underage pages?
24 posted on 10/18/2006 8:26:20 AM PDT by Stark_GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
Celebrated Gay Democratic Congressional Child Molester Gerry Studds ....
25 posted on 10/18/2006 8:27:59 AM PDT by BenLurkin ("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
It may be illegal if RAT senators were having sex with them as well.

It may be that the page program is nothing more than a hand picked gay young boy stable these freaks keep close at hand so they don't have to cruise the streets in Boystown late at night...

26 posted on 10/18/2006 8:31:10 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary (Bukhari:V1B1N6 “Just issue orders to kill every Jew in the country.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
It appears he didn't lie about it under oath either nor did he use the power of his office to obstruct justice.

Not to mention that Foley resigned immediately and the GOP has neither defended nor excused his behavior.

27 posted on 10/18/2006 8:34:40 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dead

Maybe he turned over a new page...........


28 posted on 10/18/2006 8:39:32 AM PDT by Red Badger (CONGRESS NEEDS TO BE DE-FOLEY-ATED...............................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
FBI agents are seeking to interview every male congressional page during the 12 years Foley served in Washington, according to officials and pages who have been interviewed.

"Then we plan to start questioning the female pages," said one senior law enforcement official.

Oh? Is it possible that there are some non-Republican congresscritters who actually had physical sex with underage pages?

29 posted on 10/18/2006 8:40:03 AM PDT by Sooth2222
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
"In cases where actual sex followed, it was not until the boys were at the legal age of 18."

So Brian Ross is admitting that he started a rumor in expectation that the FBI would investigate. What a partisan hack! I want to know what the probable cause is for the FBI to investigate, because ABC says so? None of the IMs or E-mails I've seen showed any solicitation for sexual contact only some dirty talk. In 2003 the Supreme Court ruled that dirty talk even to a minor is protected free speech as long as there is no solicitation for sex or visual exposure to genital areas. They ruled that parents have the responsibility to monitor what their children are saying on-line, not the government. I can't remember the case but it was an overruling appeal from a lower court that said dirty talk was a form of porn.
30 posted on 10/18/2006 8:40:37 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

Nothing here we didn't already know...

Just another excuse for Brian Ross to keep this story on the front burner..


31 posted on 10/18/2006 8:45:26 AM PDT by Txsleuth (FREEIPATHON TIME--You need FR, you know you do, so please don't forget to donate!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
I understand the Feds may have found some Foley photo albums with some potentially damaging evidence, but so far they've been useless since all the pages are stuck together...

LOL!!! Good one!

32 posted on 10/18/2006 8:48:08 AM PDT by Diver Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

Take your logic a little farther and you really have a dilemna. We all have to ask ourselves this quextion?

If this were a heterosexual man, and we exchanged the male pages for female interns, would this "scandal" have ever been covered. Would the behavior of the congressman be called "flirting" or "predation"? Beause he's gay, and a Republican, of course the media will call him a predator despite the implications for the gay community in general.


PF


33 posted on 10/18/2006 8:58:35 AM PDT by PresidentFelon (Reuters Reporter Adam Entous beats his Mother.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

"So, when is the lamestream media going to admit that despite Foley's perversions, he didn't actually break any laws?"

November 8th.


34 posted on 10/18/2006 8:59:59 AM PDT by LadyNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

I wonder if Foley had admitted he was a homosexual before this sleazeorama broke. Would his emails to underage pages be more tolerable to the MSM. I think the answer would be yes. I am very cynical but think the MSM is not indignant over Foley emailing and instant messaging underage pages but that he concealed his homosexuality.

No doubt if he had admitted he was a homosexual the press would give him a free pass. We would now be reading terms such as Foley " mentor to youth" Foley " pioneer in breaking down intergenerational sex barriers" Foley " bringing confused young men hope over their sexual identity" Foley " Republican willing to buck party's
hypocritical morality". Yeah he would be man of the year.

Foley is a sleaze and deserves contempt and if criminal charges are filed he should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.


35 posted on 10/18/2006 9:01:01 AM PDT by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

No pages were harmed in the manufacturing of this scandal.

The Democrats and the media have been everywhere saying that Foley sodomized children.
Chris Matthews was on the Tonight Show about two weeks ago and widened the net to include all Republicans as molesters.
He told Leno that Republicans in Congress were acting like Catholic priests in the recent church scandal.
Harold Ford said that Republicans in Congress were protecting a " child molester."
And taking money from this child molester's PAC.
I think I've gotten more revolting Spam in my e mail than anything Foley and Edmund sent to each other.
The age of consent in most states and I would wager this was pushed by many Democrat legislatures- is anywhere from 16 to 18.
In Massachussetts, thanks to the Democrats-it's legal for two gays of 18 to " marry."
If Foley was a Democrat, ABC would be asking Jordan Edmund if the couple was registered at Crate and Barrel.
But, when a Republican is involved ,suddenly a man of 18 is now a helpless, wimpering child , a mere baby that must be protected , with no concept of the word No.
Tell that to those 18 year old Marines, soldiers and sailors proudly serving their country.


36 posted on 10/18/2006 9:01:31 AM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
His DIM party gave him 'quickiefreebie' on it. All of a sudden it's wrong, go figure. Foley should have held a press conference and cried about being a misunderstood gay American.
37 posted on 10/18/2006 9:04:10 AM PDT by Jaded ("I have a mustard- seed; and I am not afraid to use it."- Joseph Ratzinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dead
Maybe he really is just a creep, not a criminal.

He abused his authority and obviously has a thing for "barely legal" teens. He deserves to be kicked out of public life and should never hold a managerial position of any kind again.

But no, he's not a criminal...not now, anyway.

Regards, Ivan

38 posted on 10/18/2006 9:05:46 AM PDT by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
I don't care much about people in Congress who smoke poles except for that it gives people leverage against them. Since members of Congress can "earmark" money it's not good that someone can blackmail them. So, because some in Congress might be secretly gat we need to outlaw earmarking.

What really pisses me off are parasites like Harry Reid who ripoff the taxpayer to line their own pockets. But what's new about that?

39 posted on 10/18/2006 9:05:57 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (Sliding butt stock, carry handle, gas operated. Named after a horse. What am I?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
The whole initial notion by Brian Ross, ABC and CREW was that Foley committed a crime and not just that he's a weird perv. While I'm glad the perv Foley is gone I hope he sues the hell out of ABC and Brian Ross.
40 posted on 10/18/2006 9:19:40 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

"Still sick if Foley used the page program as a recruiting center for future sex partners. Kind of like a President using the intern program for sex partners."


Couldn't agree more. Indoctrination, softening the opinions of young people over time, for the homosexual agenda is sick. And does as much damage to kids as the eventual molestation does. Congress, schools, makes no difference, it's sick.


41 posted on 10/18/2006 9:29:11 AM PDT by gidget7 (Political Correctness is Marxism with a nose job)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

42 posted on 10/18/2006 9:29:57 AM PDT by rbudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch; xtinct; holdonnow; Laura_Ingraham; PhilDragoo; ntnychik; dixiechick; Grampa Dave; ...




43 posted on 10/18/2006 10:36:27 AM PDT by devolve (now_playing:........significant shrinkage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devolve

A sex scandal with apparatly no sex.


44 posted on 10/18/2006 10:37:38 AM PDT by teddyballgame (red man in a blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

And when they realized they weren't minors, they started referring to them as "teeagers." Of course that accurate, but they did it to create an image that Foley was preying on children.


45 posted on 10/18/2006 10:41:12 AM PDT by ShandaLear (So there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
I noticed one of our local T.V. stations wanted to make sure they could string the story out longer by saying that he sent emails to "teens", instead of underage teens.

It's UNBELIEVABLE how much play this story is getting! Well, on second thought... No it's not, cuz the dork's a Republican!

46 posted on 10/18/2006 10:43:14 AM PDT by RogerWilko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
Maybe the FBI should investigate whether any of the Congressional websites were compromised by their ISP providers.

-PJ

47 posted on 10/18/2006 10:47:33 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Fantastic, your menagerie grows!


48 posted on 10/18/2006 10:57:21 AM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: potlatch



It's a circus out there!


49 posted on 10/18/2006 11:08:14 AM PDT by devolve (now_playing:.......LOVE FOR SALE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Under the 'big top' of the capitol! A circus for sure.


50 posted on 10/18/2006 11:22:29 AM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson