- Women and Minorities Hardest Hit
Posted on 10/18/2006 4:50:21 PM PDT by blogblogginaway
Wed Oct 18 2006 19:12:07 ET
With an unusually large number of tight races and dozens of states shifting to new electronic voting systems, election officials across the country are bracing for long lines and heightened confusion at the polls on Election Day, Nov. 7, the NEW YORK TIMES will front on Thursday.
"North Carolina, Ohio, Indiana, Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Mississippi and Missouri are among the states considered most likely to experience difficulties, according to voting experts who have been tracking the new technology and other election changes.
Developing...
"DEAD PEOPLE."
30,000 people with the name Mick E. Mouse.
We're ready even though they moved the polling place back where it was three decades ago.
Absolutely!
If they win, we won't hear a peep about the machines.
I hate them. >:-(
If we had mandatory voter ID's, it wouldn't even be close. If a dem wins by one vote, the system worked. If he loses by one, the election was stolen or corrupt.
-PJ
U Bet! This yada yada yada FUD is readily avoided.Vote absentee!
What does that mean?
I have an internet connection with a Diebold voter machine in Artesia, NM.
The fix is in. And I store all my music on it. </SRC>
In other words "If we lose we sue"
DEM strategy...
Throw the entire voting system into doubt!
The Commies did this with great success...until the whole lieing mess collapsed.
In the meanwhile, it allows then to put up a holy scream that they were not treated "fair"ly.
The sad thing is that the MSM will report their grudge without any deep look into the actual voting.
N= In
B4= Before
R= Rove
Y= You
M= Magnificent
B= B@stard!
;)
Hope they keep it up with these articles. Maybe it will scare many of those dems into staying home. We conservatives can handle lines and voting machines. LOL
Sounds like the polls are trending pubbie.
That is something that I will be checking up on Nov.7th. Will be counting the number of voters who enter the polls at our local precincts. Have my doubts that percentage wise this election will see more than a 1 or 2 percentage increase over any other normal election.
i.e. The New York Times doesn't think the Dems are going to win and this will be pointed too when they lose the election.
This looks like the warm-up for the post election Diebold-Rove conspiracy theories.
This is definitely the NY Times' set-up piece to claim GOP voter fraud at a later date. They must finally be seeing the true, statistically-valid polls that have Karl Rove and Ken Mehlman so enthused.
If this is their motive, it's really diabolical. The states on their list are -- coincidentally I'm sure -- the same ones where the hot, contested battles will be waged for control of the House and Senate.
Translation: Republicans retain a majority in Congress.
Only by Republicans.
Don't you have the secret password?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.