Winning This Election With a Topic That Will Resonate

Great campaigns have been formed when bright ideas, rarely at the forefront of the public mind but which resonate with vigorous strength when introduced, are presented. I can think of no better issue that could accomplish this in this day and age than alternative sentencing. The issue, if presented correctly, has the power to change the focus of the election.

The reasoning is simple. Most people believe that in today's day and age, when a variety of options exist to deal with and deter crime, no one who isn't a threat to society should ever be locked up. Indeed, it is cruel to incarcerate someone who poses no threat to society.

But one may ask, what of the crime epidemic? Well, study after study has shown that menial labor is a far greater deterrent to criminals reoffending than prison. In fact, prison makes career criminals out of non-violent offenders for the simple reason that when someone is locked up, bored to death with only criminals surrounding them, the likelihood that they'll simply "join the club" is immense.

Just ask anyone which of the two is a greater deterrent to society, which of the following sends a clearer, more visible impression to potential criminals? Locking up a criminal so that no one sees them or sending a bus to pick them up every morning in full view of their neighbors, taking them away until late at night for back breaking work and then dropping them off tired and disheveled? Imagine that happening day in and day out! Which of the two punishments truly accomplishes what prison was supposed to do?

Add to that the fact that a greater percentage of Americans are incarcerated than in any other country and the fact that juries have shown a tendency to convict based on suspicion alone and the case for alternative sentencing becomes clear. Then add to the mix the fact that alternative sentencing would force criminals to pay for their own upkeep instead of society doing it for them with our tax dollars and at the expense of other needed programs.

The Corrections Industry would benefit from such a program too as prison guards would become work duty supervisors or organizers. Owners of private prisons stand to benefit by administering these labor contracts, sending non-violent offenders to work for companies that need hard, menial labor, the type of labor that few others will do.

Now ask the American people if it really makes sense to punish families by sending parents away from young children for years at a time when they pose no threat to society and often due to accidental crimes when there's a far better and far more effective way? Ask the American people which system truly deters and truly provides corrective punishment.

Add to that another simple fact. If you take a sixteen year old kid who was involved in minor crime and sentence him to 6 months in prison you'll have a career criminal on your hands in no time. Take the same kid, wake him up early every day and send him out to shovel ditches for half that time or less and he'll never offend again.

In short, any party that wants to win this election and remind the American voters which party is the party of ideas should be promoting this issue in full force. Let's get this election back to issues that voters care about. This one will resonate.

Note: The President's foreign policy, which may be unpopular now but which will be seen as having been necessary and an example of foresight in the future, is already a legacy builder as are the tax cuts that stimulated the economic success that is recognized by all who follow the markets, but to cement his legacy as a truly "Compassionate Conservative," one who did what was right and changed society for the better, in the most effective and memorable way, there's no better issue to accomplish this than to cite the facts laid out above in a clear and concise manner, followed by memorable action.

If President Bush gets up and makes the case for alternative sentencing and then boldly offers a Presidential commutation to all non-violent and non-willful offenders from prison to a daily labor program he'll not only have cemented his reputation as a man who changed society and taught a lesson in true justice that will last and will resonate. Even his sharpest critics would be forced to say "this man gets it." This issue, more than any other, can shock people into realization, with an "Of course - Why didn't I think of that?" It certainly has the ability to shift the topic of conversation, memorably so.

I don't even know where to begin here. First of all forget the word "punishment". We don't do that anymore. Commit a crime and yeah; prison isn't pleasant but it's not so bad. Death row? One is more likely to die of old age rather than ole sparky.

The blame for crime is placed on guns, race, poverty, you name it; anything but a savage willfully committing an illegal act. A plethora of blame organizations exist. Not one of them; the NAACP, the gun-grabbers, The Southern Poverty Law Center, has done one thing to stop criminals.

Tired of crime: Amend the Constitution to remove the 'cruel and unusual' verbiage. Stop the endless appeals based on nebulous rules. Turn prisons into places of punishment again. Reform has failed; the last forty years are proof of that.

I don't know where to begin either, so let me just finish with this ... you seem to think that the prisons are full of folks that just got a lousy deal. Lemme tell you, prisons are full of repeat offenders, slow learners who won't change their behaviors regardless of whatever remedial programs are provided to them when incarcerated.

The "non-violent" prisoners are repeat offenders as well, even if serving their first and only sentence. Nobody gets caught, convicted and imprisoned on their first offense. Nope. Crime does indeed pay, for months and sometimes years before the law catches up to them.

Talk to me about providing more prison ministries like Colson's, and I'm behind you all the way. Recidivism for them is actually and certifiably very low.

I agree that death sentences need to be immediate though they should be given only when proven beyond reasonable doubt - a standard juries often ignore, causing many innocents to be convicted and harsh sentences for petty crimes.

AS,

There are people who've been convicted on suspicion or for accidents and the like. That's a serious problem. In any case, where there's no danger to society real punishment that punishes the criminal and not their families is attainable.

There are also prosecutions based on arcane laws that no one knows about. There was even one guy who was convicted of importing lobsters because of a law that you cannot import items that are illegal to do so from the exportation country even though they're perfectly legal to import here (as long as not from that country). The government of that country sent a ruling saying that the import was legal but he was still convicted. The importer was sentenced to 8 years, partly for "trafficking" (i.e. importing the lobsters). That craziness has to stop.

Too many 16 year olds arrested on small charges become career criminals after. The above ideas would solve that problem.

I've heard about some of those laws. I recall reading one of those stranger than fiction stories about a law against spitting on the street--can't recall the city. The same article mention holdover laws concerning things like tying up one's horse in the wrong place.

That's another thing: All of these frivolous laws. Maybe police time and money would be better spent investigating things like murder and rape instead of rather Dick is wearing his seat belt or Jane was speaking on her cell phone while driving.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.