Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fla. 16 GOP Can’t Mention Negron at Polls, Court Rules (Foley alert)
CQ Politics ^ | Oct. 18, 2006 | Rachel Kapochunas

Posted on 10/18/2006 7:24:30 PM PDT by Alter Kaker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: Cicero
but I don't think the Supreme Court would likely interfere in a local state election.

Doesn't a vote for a U.S. Senator count as a federal election?

61 posted on 10/22/2006 2:00:45 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

This has nothing to do with the Foley scandal. If there was no scandal but he happened to die in an accident after the replacement deadline, the scurrilous Rats would be doing the same thing.


62 posted on 10/22/2006 2:09:52 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luckycin

Good Job!


63 posted on 10/22/2006 2:11:48 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

I disagree. Conservatives are not stupid.The ones who vote know he is not on the ballot anymore and that negron is.We are dealing with Conservatives not the dumb-masses of the demorat party.


64 posted on 10/22/2006 2:14:17 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maryz

Yes, SCOTUS has grounds to intervene, and maybe they will.

But they got really lambasted after they intervened the last time in Florida and reversed the SCOFLAw decision in the chad wars, and as a result (I speculate) they did not intervene a little later in that egregious decision in New Jersey that put Frank Lautenberg on the ticket contrary to New Jersey law.

I'm hoping they'll intervene, but it's a judgment call, because they get far more cases than they can possibly handle.


65 posted on 10/22/2006 2:17:15 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

This applies only to what goes on inside the polling place. Outside the polling place Reps. are free to hand out whatever information they wish.


66 posted on 10/22/2006 2:17:53 PM PDT by zook (America going insane - "Do you read Sutter Caine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

bttt


67 posted on 10/22/2006 2:19:00 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

"But, how can she say they can't even pass out notices, presumably off the polling grounds, to let voters know?? "

They can't. Beyond the 50 foot or whatever limit is set, Reps. can hand out whatever information they wish.


68 posted on 10/22/2006 2:19:32 PM PDT by zook (America going insane - "Do you read Sutter Caine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson