Skip to comments.
Scientists discover new element -- No. 118
MediaNews ^
| 10/18/06
| Ian Hoffman
Posted on 10/19/2006 8:39:08 AM PDT by presidio9
By firing atoms of metal at another metal, Russian and American scientists have discovered a new element -- No. 118 on the Periodic Table -- that is the heaviest substance known and probably hasn't existed since the universe was in its infancy.
Ununoctium, as the new element is temporarily named, has no known use but inspired almost a decade-long pursuit by scientists on four continents. Controversy in the course of its discovery hobbled the career of one physicist, sparked questions about scientific ethics and almost destroyed the world's most productive team of element hunters.
So far, science has gotten a fair measure of trouble out of Element 118 for something that destroys itself in a few thousands of a second. Yet creating the new element -- all three atoms of it -- confirmed the difficulty of finding a theorized family of super-heavy but stable elements.
``I think of this as any other journey to a new place,'' said Lawrence Livermore lab nuclear chemist and team member Nancy Stoyer. ``Why do you want to go to the moon? Why do you want to go to the top of Mount Everest? Finding it is something new, something interesting.''
Because the three atoms of Element 118 existed on average just under a thousandth of a second, scientists doubt they'll ever know much about it.
They sought an ``island of stability'' that the late master of element hunters, Nobel prize-winning Berkeley physicist Glenn Seaborg, had reasoned should be there -- a cluster of manmade elements with such a harmonious number of neutrons and protons that their nuclei didn't instantly self destruct.
Most of the super-heavy elements that scientists create in atom-smashing machines are so jammed with protons and neutrons that their nuclei look like wobbling footballs and Frisbees, inclined to crack apart easily. Nuclei
(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: elements; periodictable; ununoctium; yourtaxdollarsatwork
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
1
posted on
10/19/2006 8:39:09 AM PDT
by
presidio9
To: presidio9
2
posted on
10/19/2006 8:39:50 AM PDT
by
Froufrou
To: Froufrou
Well, they both exhibit self-destructive behavior...
3
posted on
10/19/2006 8:41:21 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(Make Mohammed's day: Shoot a nun in the back.)
To: Froufrou
Would fit, since he is of no known use.
4
posted on
10/19/2006 8:41:49 AM PDT
by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.)
To: presidio9
Ununoctium
Horrible name.
5
posted on
10/19/2006 8:42:08 AM PDT
by
Borges
To: presidio9
has no known use but inspired almost a decade-long pursuit by scientists on four continents. I wonder how much American taxpayer money was wasted on this.
6
posted on
10/19/2006 8:44:43 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: presidio9
This element was not discovered- it was created.
7
posted on
10/19/2006 8:45:06 AM PDT
by
bobjam
To: Borges
I wonder if it's an ungrammatical stab at Latin for "one-night-ium" - perhaps a reference to its impermanence?
8
posted on
10/19/2006 8:48:04 AM PDT
by
wideawake
("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
To: presidio9
To: presidio9
How much money was spent to discover/create this 1/1000th of a second event?
To: presidio9
Skinner: We can buy real periodic tables instead of these promotional ones from Oscar Meyer. Krabappel: Who can tell me the atomic weight of bolognium? Martin: Ooh ... delicious? Krabappel: Correct. I would also accept snacktacular.
11
posted on
10/19/2006 8:55:50 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
To: wagglebee
Hey, research into the nature of matter is useless, I agree with you.
To: presidio9
HEY!!! whatever happened to upsidaisyum?
13
posted on
10/19/2006 9:02:59 AM PDT
by
martin gibson
("I care not what course others may take, but as for myself, give me Ralph Stanley or give me death")
To: John Will
I'm not saying that research is useless, I'm saying that it is a waste of taxpayer money to CREATE an element that lasts ONE THOUSANTH OF A SECOND and SERVED NO KNOWN PURPOSE. And for that matter, to spend a decade on it seems like a huge waste of these physicists' talent.
14
posted on
10/19/2006 9:07:49 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: presidio9
If it only survives for a millisecond or two.... is it really an element? What is the time threshold here? Do microseconds count?
Personally, I would say that any structure that is is not stable for at least 1 second does not qualify as an element. Perhaps a new category of "transitives" could be created to categorize these very short lived atoms.
To: Borges
Ununoctium
Horrible name.
---
It's a temporary name. The discoverers will be allowed to pick a permanent name.
It means 118ium. It comes after Ununseptium(117ium) and before Ununennium(119ium), both of which are still discovered.
16
posted on
10/19/2006 9:18:31 AM PDT
by
Cheburashka
(World's only Spatula City certified spatula repair and maintenance specialist!!!)
To: martin gibson
Poindexter, dat you?
17
posted on
10/19/2006 9:43:16 AM PDT
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(The hallmark of a crackpot conspiracy theory is that it expands to include countervailing evidence.)
To: wagglebee
Well, the left has been searching for that "moderate Muslim" for a decade, and to no avail.
18
posted on
10/19/2006 9:48:50 AM PDT
by
Lekker 1
(("...the world will be...eleven degrees colder by the year 2000" -- K. Watt, Earth Day, 1970)
To: John Will
well it isn't completely useless. It can be a stable element if they have the right number of neutrons inside of it. It sounds from the article they reason it is breaking apart is because the huge number of protons and the shape of the nucleus.
19
posted on
10/19/2006 10:19:20 AM PDT
by
ryan125
To: wagglebee
No. 120 will be "Gorebotium"
The densest matter ever known, named in honor of the dense Gorebots who babble endlessly about nothing....
No. 121 will be "Clintonium" which is even worse.....
Don't even get me started on No. 122, "Carterium" will be so dense that it shares the characteristics of a "black hole"
20
posted on
10/19/2006 10:23:27 AM PDT
by
Enchante
(There are 3 kinds of lies: Lies, Damned Lies, and the Drive-By Media)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson