Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists discover new element -- No. 118
MediaNews ^ | 10/18/06 | Ian Hoffman

Posted on 10/19/2006 8:39:08 AM PDT by presidio9

By firing atoms of metal at another metal, Russian and American scientists have discovered a new element -- No. 118 on the Periodic Table -- that is the heaviest substance known and probably hasn't existed since the universe was in its infancy.

Ununoctium, as the new element is temporarily named, has no known use but inspired almost a decade-long pursuit by scientists on four continents. Controversy in the course of its discovery hobbled the career of one physicist, sparked questions about scientific ethics and almost destroyed the world's most productive team of element hunters.

So far, science has gotten a fair measure of trouble out of Element 118 for something that destroys itself in a few thousands of a second. Yet creating the new element -- all three atoms of it -- confirmed the difficulty of finding a theorized family of super-heavy but stable elements.

``I think of this as any other journey to a new place,'' said Lawrence Livermore lab nuclear chemist and team member Nancy Stoyer. ``Why do you want to go to the moon? Why do you want to go to the top of Mount Everest? Finding it is something new, something interesting.''

Because the three atoms of Element 118 existed on average just under a thousandth of a second, scientists doubt they'll ever know much about it.

They sought an ``island of stability'' that the late master of element hunters, Nobel prize-winning Berkeley physicist Glenn Seaborg, had reasoned should be there -- a cluster of manmade elements with such a harmonious number of neutrons and protons that their nuclei didn't instantly self destruct.

Most of the super-heavy elements that scientists create in atom-smashing machines are so jammed with protons and neutrons that their nuclei look like wobbling footballs and Frisbees, inclined to crack apart easily. Nuclei

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: elements; periodictable; ununoctium; yourtaxdollarsatwork
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Enchante
Don't even get me started on No. 122, "Carterium" will be so dense that it shares the characteristics of a "black hole"

I suspect you have too low of numbers for both 120 and 122.

21 posted on 10/19/2006 10:30:20 AM PDT by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Tape machines I work on have frames made of Japanesium.
It is a very soft but shiny metal incapable of maintaining the shape of screw threads. It was to be replaced with frames made of unobtainium, but there has been a delay in production.
22 posted on 10/19/2006 10:31:27 AM PDT by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

All that just for the fame that goes with "discovering" a new element?


23 posted on 10/19/2006 10:36:15 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

"a cluster of manmade elements with such a harmonious number of neutrons and protons that their nuclei didn't instantly self destruct."

Sounds like trying to make a column of shaving cream. If only they can pile it high enough, it won't fall over.


24 posted on 10/19/2006 10:44:24 AM PDT by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

When will Wal-Mart stock this stuff?


25 posted on 10/19/2006 10:50:24 AM PDT by Dr. Zzyzx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Un-un-oct-ium = 1 - 1 - 8 - ium.

But I like your suggestion.


26 posted on 10/19/2006 11:22:25 AM PDT by Tenniel (Never explain. Your friends don’t need it, and your enemies won’t believe it anyway. – E. Hubbard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I wonder how much American taxpayer money was wasted on this.

I must disagree that this is a wasted effort. If an island of stability is found in an element off the end of the current chart of elements, it could very well have useful properties. Even if not, this type of basic research is one of the reasons we exist as a species IMO. Better than wasting my tax money on bridges to nowhere. I'd be willing to bet good money that less tax money was spent by these researchers than the aforementioned taxpayer financed boondoggle.

27 posted on 10/19/2006 12:25:29 PM PDT by zeugma (I reject your reality and substitute my own in its place. (http://www.zprc.org/))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
Perhaps a new category of "transitives" could be created to categorize these very short lived atoms.

Not a bad idea IMO. 

I'm still interested in seeing if there are any non-transitives beyond the end of the current PT as now known .

28 posted on 10/19/2006 12:27:36 PM PDT by zeugma (I reject your reality and substitute my own in its place. (http://www.zprc.org/))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Glad my Chemistry Regents exams are far in my past. One more element to memorize might put me over the edge.


29 posted on 10/19/2006 12:36:47 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson