Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYC to look for more remains at WTC site
AP ^ | 10/20/2006 | By SARA KUGLER and AMY WESTFELDT, Associated Press Writers

Posted on 10/20/2006 7:50:08 PM PDT by Prost1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: sgtbono2002

Kinda reminds me of those who place shrines at the site of automobile accidents. Morbid to say the least.


21 posted on 10/20/2006 10:33:47 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 10th Mountain Division 2nd BCT Soldier fighting in Mahmudiyah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: elli1
Did I say 'tons of body parts'?

No. But Lower Manhattan isn't the first place most New Yorkers would think of when thinking of where body parts are disposed of by the mob or whomever. There are too many people around, too much of a police presence and too many public and private security cameras down there for someone not to notice. The area around the World Trade Center site isn't some secluded outer borough parkland or Jersey swampland. It doesn't make much sense.
22 posted on 10/20/2006 10:50:04 PM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Prost1
They also called for state and federal investigations into the failure to completely remove remains from ground zero

"failure"??? Investigation???

The people who dug, labored, - and many who are now dying as a result of their months at what has got to be one of the hardest things anyone can be called upon to do - ...well, I'm speechless. If there's an "investigation" on this - I say a Pox on all who participate...

23 posted on 10/20/2006 11:15:07 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

Nothing is as easy as it should be in NYC. Those folks will get their benefits, but not without a lot of legal bickering. NYC isn't a place where someone gets up, makes a pronouncement and everyone falls into line.


24 posted on 10/20/2006 11:18:47 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: elli1
Hi elli-

Disposing of body parts around the WTC? What in the world are you talking about? Have you ever visited that area of Manhattan at virtually anytime of the day or night? It is positively teeming with people...tourists, businesspeople, residents, schoolkids, police, shopkeepers, you name it. Nobody is "sneaking" into that place to ditch a corpse or two.

~ Blue Jays ~

25 posted on 10/20/2006 11:23:23 PM PDT by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

They interfere with road workers, look bad and and shouldnt be allowed.


26 posted on 10/21/2006 4:41:56 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

I'm all for providing education to people about the hazards of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs; and allowing people to grieve the loss of a loved one due to alcohol or drug related vehicle accidents. However, I'm not too sure that roadside markers of the scene of an accident is the proper way to do all that. Presents a visual distraction for other drivers, and can be a problem for road crews as you posted.


27 posted on 10/21/2006 8:37:32 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 10th Mountain Division 2nd BCT Soldier fighting in Mahmudiyah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

Although I believe all are in bad taste , some are more aggrievous than others/ A small cross isnt bad, but some come with balloons artificial flowers, teddy bears and other such tripe that they really are horrible looking after a few weeks.


28 posted on 10/22/2006 4:52:29 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Prost1
I have come to believe the driving motivation behind the delay in rebuilding are simply because the "power that be" do not want to see the towers built while President Bush is in office. They don't want the administration given credit, whether direct or indirect for the achievement of a crowning triumph during a time of war. They also want to deprive the nation of the boost in moral at a time when it would unite the nation in favor of the battle against terrism.

I believe that they secretly hope that the towers can be rebuilt while "President Hillary" in running the show and that will be used as a beacon of successful that her administration can claim. After all, NY is "her state".

I don't think one needs to look any further than that.

29 posted on 10/22/2006 5:01:38 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prost1
FWIW, I think that is hallowed ground now.
30 posted on 10/22/2006 5:04:33 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48
RE: it's "Bush's Fault"

By now dummyunderground, dailycuss, and moron.org must have thousands of threads claiming that Karl Rove planted the body parts thus bringing 9/11 into the campaign.

31 posted on 10/23/2006 2:20:40 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson