Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN's Sniper Film: This Time It's Personal
Mens News Daily ^ | October 22, 2006 | By Tom Glennon

Posted on 10/22/2006 11:36:38 AM PDT by Nasty McPhilthy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last

1 posted on 10/22/2006 11:36:39 AM PDT by Nasty McPhilthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy
How much time did CNN devote to Medal of Honor Winner SGT Paul Smith, USA, who gave his life to save his troops?

Far less than they have spent honoring the deeds of terrorists killing our troops.

CNN is scum.

2 posted on 10/22/2006 11:38:47 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (Difference between the CIA and the Free Clinic is that the Free Clinic knows how to stop a leak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy

Is there no way the parents or wife can sue cnn for invasion of privacy?


3 posted on 10/22/2006 11:38:59 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Doctor Raoul

It was SFC, not SGT.

But to answer your question, essentially none. The media doesn't want heroes, they want skapegoats.


5 posted on 10/22/2006 11:39:58 AM PDT by stm (Katherine Harris for US Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stm

oops skapegoats=scapegoats


6 posted on 10/22/2006 11:40:24 AM PDT by stm (Katherine Harris for US Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
CNN is scum.

And so are the companies who choose to buy ad time on it.

7 posted on 10/22/2006 11:40:26 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul

Sobering, accurate, realistic account.

But the MSM will excuse it, will ignore it.


8 posted on 10/22/2006 11:41:22 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy
Remember how CNN admitted they knew about the atrocities in Iraq pre 9/11 but did not report the truth for fear they would lose their sources in Iraq?

Yes, they are scum.

9 posted on 10/22/2006 11:41:46 AM PDT by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy
CNN is really stupid.

There are lots of video cameras in Iraq. Lots of rifles with telescopic sights. Lots of CNN reporters.

And, last but not least...

there's the Internet.

10 posted on 10/22/2006 11:42:34 AM PDT by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy

I wonder if CNN would show a video of one of their fellow journalist getting shot in Iraq or injured by a bomb or something? I think they should if they are only interested in "showing the unvarnished truth" as they say in their own words.

Hypocrites and treasonous bastards they are.


11 posted on 10/22/2006 11:43:25 AM PDT by The South Texan (The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stm

If I was in Afghanistan or Iraq no member of the media would be safe near me.


12 posted on 10/22/2006 11:43:25 AM PDT by rcofdayton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy

Ted Turner doesn't know what side he's on. He said so himself.


13 posted on 10/22/2006 11:43:48 AM PDT by ducdriver ("Impartiality is a pompous name for indifference, which is an elegant name for ignorance." GKC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy

BTTTT


14 posted on 10/22/2006 11:45:27 AM PDT by Blackirish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcofdayton

We hated those stinking embeds. They were a huge liability, in more ways than one.


15 posted on 10/22/2006 11:46:29 AM PDT by stm (Katherine Harris for US Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freeangel; All

Why not tell those who advertise on CNN we refuse to buy your products?


16 posted on 10/22/2006 11:47:27 AM PDT by Perdogg (Democratic Party - The political wing of Al Qaida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy
FYI, Here is CNN's response to my scathing e-mail:

Thank you for your email regarding the insurgent sniper segment and for providing us the opportunity to respond to your concern.

Michael Ware was not with the insurgents. No CNN staffer was present during the making of the insurgent sniper video.

Through an intermediary, CNN sent a list of questions to a group of insurgents. They sent back videotaped answers and this sniper video.

To be clear: We were not embedded with the insurgency and did not meet or spend any time with the snipers.

As you know from seeing the videotape, we dipped to black at the moment of impact. We did not show any Americans being shot.

That decision -- in fact, all the decisions about this story -- were subject to hours of intense editorial discussion at the highest levels here at CNN. The insurgent videotapes were reviewed very carefully, not only by CNN journalists, but also with the advice and guidance of a recently retired US Marines sniper and CNN's military analyst, Brigadier General David Grange (Retired). In particular, General Grange was able to advise on the significance of the insurgent use of snipers from his extensive service as a Ranger, Green Beret, and as a member of Delta Force.

If you have not yet seen Michael Ware's story, it is available for viewing at CNN.com. Again, thank you for allowing us the opportunity to respond. Respectfully, CNN

17 posted on 10/22/2006 11:48:03 AM PDT by lawnguy (Give me some of your tots!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lawnguy

It's the same response I got - and everybody else, I'll wager.

form letters! the pinnacle of sincerity!


18 posted on 10/22/2006 11:54:08 AM PDT by AIM-54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

"Is there no way the parents or wife can sue cnn for invasion of privacy?"

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress! IIED, and very bad. Could be worth millions to the families of those killed that day!


19 posted on 10/22/2006 11:55:58 AM PDT by lawdude (The dems see Wal-Mart as a bigger threat to the US than muslim terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy

Hopefully CNN will be the target of the next errant plane flown by "freedom fighters".


20 posted on 10/22/2006 11:57:28 AM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson