Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael J. Fox is a cannibal
http://www.worldnetdaily.com ^ | 10 25 06 | Jill Staneck

Posted on 10/25/2006 10:21:35 AM PDT by freepatriot32

Michael J. Fox is a famous TV and movie star. He is witty. He is charming. A few years ago, we learned he has Parkinson's disease.

PD is a slowly progressive neurological disorder, characterized by tremors, shuffling gait, a masklike facial expression, "pill rolling" of the fingers, drooling, intolerance to heat, oily skin, emotional instability and defective judgment (although intelligence is rarely impaired).

PD is currently incurable, although there are several methods to slow its advancement, including drug therapy and surgery.

PD is tragic, particularly in Fox's case, because it rarely afflicts persons under 60 years old.

Yet everyone faces tragedy at one time or another, in one form or another. A person's moral fiber is revealed in tragedy.

So we learned through Fox's affliction that he has either extremely poor judgment or a diabolical character flaw. He supports human embryonic stem-cell experimentation, thus contending that some humans are subhuman and expendable for others' personal gain.

We know there is nothing new under the sun. So Fox's character flaw is not new, just a variation of the worst of human behavior throughout history.

Slaveholders thought those whose lives and deaths they controlled were "property," as the U.S. Supreme Court determined in the 1857 Dred Scott decision. Hitler thought Jews were evolutionary mistakes. The Islamic government of Sudan currently has it in for black Christians.

Different day, different holocaust.

As is always the case, the powerful determine the fate of the powerless, and if the powerful don't hold the view that all humans are created equal, then the powerless end up enslaved or dead.

Some may think I'm going over the top to compare Fox to slave owners or Hitler or the Sudanese government. "Fox is a nice guy, and he's sick. Be nice."

If you think that, your sympathies are misplaced. Fox advocates killing certain people to experiment on them "for the greater good" simply because those people don't look like we do – yet. This is odd, because some day Fox won't look like most people either.

If Fox wanted to kill a football stadium full of toddlers to experiment on them, I doubt anyone would think he was normal, and I doubt anyone would bear with his barbaric rambling to be nice.

But using Fox's logic, experimentation of 2-year-olds should be acceptable. Toddlers are certainly far less developed on the human continuum and don't look at all normal by adult standards. The reason they are called "toddlers" in the first place is because their oversized heads and bellies cause them to "toddle" when they walk.

Scientifically speaking, a human is a human from the instant of fertilization, no matter what phase of development. "Take that single cell of the just conceived zygote, put it next to a chimpanzee cell, and 'a geneticist could easily identify the human. Its humanity is already that strikingly apparent,'" said Randy Alcorn in his newly released book, "Why Pro-Life?," quoting from "Preview of a Birth."

I'll worry about Fox's feelings after he stops using his considerable influence to convince the American public to support taxpayer-funded human embryonic stem-cell experimentation. Fox is not only pushing an ideology on me that advocates the destruction of human life, but he also wants to force me to pay for it. What gall.

I feel sorry for Fox's kids. Flashing them either forward or backward in one of Fox's "Back to the Future" movies, they are in lose-lose situations.

The future Fox wants to create for his three daughters looks bleak. No longer will only hens lay eggs for human consumption if Fox has his way. His daughters will be exploited for their eggs, too, because the only source of these pre-embryos is women. It is foolish to think technology will be sated by the availability of today's orphaned embryos, as is now the spin.

And in an altered past, Fox would have allowed the dissection of his days-old embryonic children so he could surgically ingest them in an effort to cure his own ailments – high tech cannibalism.

It's funny that Fox calls himself a vegetarian.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill Stanek fought to stop "live-birth abortion" after witnessing one as a registered nurse at Christ Hospital in Oak Lawn, Ill. In 2002, President Bush asked Jill to attend his signing of the Born Alive Infants Protection Act. In January 2003, World Magazine named Jill one of the 30 most prominent pro-life leaders of the past 30 years. To learn more, visit Jill's blog, Pro-life Pulse.http://www.jillstanek.com/


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; hollywoodpinglist; michaeljfox; stemcellresearch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-196 next last

1 posted on 10/25/2006 10:21:36 AM PDT by freepatriot32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Succinct and true.


2 posted on 10/25/2006 10:25:14 AM PDT by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; little jeremiah; cpforlife.org; Coleus; Mr. Silverback; cgk; narses

ping


3 posted on 10/25/2006 10:26:09 AM PDT by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

ping


4 posted on 10/25/2006 10:26:44 AM PDT by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
a masklike facial expression

nancy pelosi???

5 posted on 10/25/2006 10:27:16 AM PDT by From One - Many (Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Fox is a typical liberal dupe. Sadly his disease makes him a special target of the libs, like Christopher Reeve was. Same modus operandi. And IMHO, PD or not, when he steps into the public light, and opens his mouth, he is fair game. No holds barred.


6 posted on 10/25/2006 10:27:37 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

No need for such a provocative title to expose how Michael J. Fox and democrats are lying and playing on the emotions of people.


7 posted on 10/25/2006 10:27:44 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

I don't respect him a bit, the whole shaking thing was just a big act for the cameras, after all - acting is his career.

Ann Coulter said a few months ago in her new book how the Left goes out of its way to find these people that are "victims" and thus cannot be debated against, like the Jersey girls and Max Cleland who blew his own legs off by playing around with a grenade and now the Left rolls out this shaking clown, the DNC operatives probably stood at the side of the TV commercial set and told him to shake more, I wonder how many takes it took before they thought the over-exaggerated shaking was good enough.


8 posted on 10/25/2006 10:28:50 AM PDT by TracyTucson (Teachers : Overpaid and Underworked........ Eliminate > ADA, EOE, NLRB, SS, DOE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

If we're not careful, we'll wake up in a Brave New World where the living cannabilize the next generation to maintain their lives. And that should scare the heck out of everyone!


9 posted on 10/25/2006 10:29:09 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I don't remember if he actually used "embryonic" stem cell research. You can used just stem cells that are not "embryonic". Maybe that's what Michael was referring to? Or not. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.


10 posted on 10/25/2006 10:36:41 AM PDT by micho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Mr. Fox was unavailable for comment.

11 posted on 10/25/2006 10:39:12 AM PDT by Redcloak (Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: micho

Can't researchers use whatever stem cells they want? I thought it was just the groups dragging on the gov. teet that cannot use embryonic cells.


12 posted on 10/25/2006 10:39:24 AM PDT by DonaldC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

This is the best possible argument. I've asked liberals this before, "If killing and eating an infant would cure any disease and add 50 years to your life, would it be OK to do it?"

I'll tell you the very, very scary truth though, not one has ever said, "No." In fact, after just a bit of hesitation, they all start justifying actually doing it.


13 posted on 10/25/2006 10:40:00 AM PDT by SampleMan (Do not dispute the peacefulness of Islam, so as not to send Muslims into violent outrage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

Right.
Just no Federal Government $$$. California has ponied up for some in their state.


14 posted on 10/25/2006 10:41:25 AM PDT by Mrs.Z (Mrs.Z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

First he does that Ad for the Dem in Missouri, and today he's in Wheaton, Illinois, stumping for Tammy Duckworth. Funny, I thought he lived in California.


15 posted on 10/25/2006 10:45:40 AM PDT by redstates4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Time to replay the Chris Reeves Southpark Episode.
16 posted on 10/25/2006 10:47:58 AM PDT by msnimje (Democratic Leftists are nothing like LIBERAL. They are intolerant and intellectual cowards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Fox is another "human shield" that the Demos are trotting out in a last ditch effort to defeat Talent, Steele and a couple of others. Hopefully, the public is not as stupid as they think they are. I can't stand Fox and now have little sympathy for the "actor".


17 posted on 10/25/2006 10:49:35 AM PDT by juliej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: redstates4ever
thought he lived in California

Obama lives in Illinois, but he's been all over lately. Come to think of it Bush is from Texas and currently resides in DC, but he has been seen campaigning all over lately too. It's Political Season, and there are no rules.

18 posted on 10/25/2006 10:53:14 AM PDT by southlake_hoosier (.... One Nation, Under God.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

If injecting a blastocyst into your body would cure any disease and add 50 years to your life, would it be OK to do it?


19 posted on 10/25/2006 10:56:17 AM PDT by cccp_hater (Just the facts please)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: redstates4ever

He's coming to Virginia to appear with Jimmy Webb next week...


20 posted on 10/25/2006 10:59:58 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (http://wardsmythe.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Sacrificing humans, born or un-born, is never acceptable in a civilized world. Our retired minister has PD and he is now house bound. It is a terrible disease and what everyone needs to accept is the deck of cards you are dealt.


21 posted on 10/25/2006 11:02:12 AM PDT by DownInFlames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AGP; Angelwood; BillF; tgslTakoma; daughterofTGSL; Doctor Raoul; Exit148; Flora McDonald; ...
See? I told you! Hence, my new tagline.
22 posted on 10/25/2006 11:14:38 AM PDT by BufordP ("Every morning I start my day with juice, toast, and a big bowl of Baby Crunch!" -- Michael J. Fox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cccp_hater
blastocyst = embryo = human

A rose is a rose is a rose. Killing innocent life is wrong. Final benefit is not a mitigating defense for murder.

Isn't it interesting that we don't divide up what constitutes life in the animal kingdom. If I break a Bald Eagle's egg, it is considered the same crime as killing the Eagle. Curiously, what is the difference between a fertilized egg and a day old baby in your view? Neither one is salient or viable if left alone.

23 posted on 10/25/2006 11:15:24 AM PDT by SampleMan (Do not dispute the peacefulness of Islam, so as not to send Muslims into violent outrage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BufordP

I still can't figure out who Steve Reeves is.


24 posted on 10/25/2006 11:23:06 AM PDT by tgslTakoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: micho
Mark Levin on MJF's commercial

Click on

25 posted on 10/25/2006 11:23:55 AM PDT by BufordP ("Every morning I start my day with juice, toast, and a big bowl of Baby Crunch!" -- Michael J. Fox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma

Poop! I keep getting Steve and Christopher Reeves confused. Must be coming down with alzeimer's. Should I eat babies for the cure?


26 posted on 10/25/2006 11:25:36 AM PDT by BufordP ("Every morning I start my day with juice, toast, and a big bowl of Baby Crunch!" -- Michael J. Fox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

I agree. Fox has placed himself in this debate, but I don't think Republicans should take the bait. It's a lose-lose situation for anyone who comments on it, including Fox himself as this article says. The man, a great actor in his day, is suffering a lot. I just don't want to add to it. I think Rush was correct to make his observations, but I think it's time to drop the subject.


27 posted on 10/25/2006 11:27:07 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

ping


28 posted on 10/25/2006 11:27:50 AM PDT by itslex71 (southern by birth, republican by the grace of my dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

This is besides the fact that embryonic stem cell treatment DOESN'T WORK.
The results have come from adult stem cell research.

Why are these people so hell-bent on destroying embryos when it hasn't produced results?


29 posted on 10/25/2006 11:27:53 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
This is the best possible argument. I've asked liberals this before, "If killing and eating an infant would cure any disease and add 50 years to your life, would it be OK to do it?"

I'll tell you the very, very scary truth though, not one has ever said, "No." In fact, after just a bit of hesitation, they all start justifying actually doing it.

Brilliant! I wish I had thought of this. But from now on, I'll be using it.

30 posted on 10/25/2006 11:34:49 AM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: twigs

Rush has apologized to Fox. OK, so apologize, but stand firm on the fact that Fox is WRONG!


31 posted on 10/25/2006 11:34:55 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

32 posted on 10/25/2006 11:35:40 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Not sure if this angel on Michael J. Fox has been explored. Michael J. Fox is a Canadian. So the question comes to me why does he not go to the Canadian Parliament and have them commit to doing the stem cell research he wants. He should be demanding that Canada kill their children and have the Canadian taxpayers and citizen pay for the research and development I mean after all does Canada not have a superior medical system than the states?


33 posted on 10/25/2006 11:35:59 AM PDT by Rogle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
No need for such a provocative title ...

I disagree. The Donks are playing hardball. It's about time we started pitching some high heat back at them.

Michael J. Fox has inserted himself into multiple campaigns around the country. Either he is lucid and responsible, and his point of view merits consideration, or he is not, and is a dupe. Either way, he needs to be refuted, and there is no need to spare his feelings.

34 posted on 10/25/2006 11:36:54 AM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
"No need for such a provocative title to expose how Michael J. Fox and democrats are lying and playing on the emotions of people."

Yes, there is. We're talking about HUMAN BEINGS here.

35 posted on 10/25/2006 11:37:16 AM PDT by jackibutterfly (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Besides, it appears his medication is magically working better today, so he can take the heat.


36 posted on 10/25/2006 11:37:31 AM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

There is only one reason to use embryonic stem cells and that's to keep abortion legal.


37 posted on 10/25/2006 11:38:05 AM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife
Why are these people so hell-bent on destroying embryos when it hasn't produced results?

Why do you think?

38 posted on 10/25/2006 11:39:09 AM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

BTTT


39 posted on 10/25/2006 11:39:22 AM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackibutterfly

How about a title like this” Michael J Fox does not care about the lives of Embryos”.


40 posted on 10/25/2006 11:40:31 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Boy she hit the nail on the head.


41 posted on 10/25/2006 11:41:59 AM PDT by diamond6 (Everyone who is for abortion has been born. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: micho
I don't remember if he actually used "embryonic" stem cell research. You can used just stem cells that are not "embryonic". Maybe that's what Michael was referring to? Or not. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

You're wrong.

Michael J. Fox never said the word "embryonic", but he was referring to existing and proposed restrictions on embryonic stem cell research. His did not use the term because he is trying to obscure the issue, and the Democrats know that if the word "embryonic" is used, they lose a lot of votes. But if he is not talking about embryonic stem cell research, then his statements make no sense at all.

42 posted on 10/25/2006 11:42:17 AM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: micho
I don't remember if he actually used "embryonic" stem cell research. You can used just stem cells that are not "embryonic". Maybe that's what Michael was referring to? Or not. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

Non-embryonic stem cell research is not controversial and receives a lot of federal funding. Michael J. Fox is talking specifically about fetal stem cell research, whether he uses the word or not.

Liberals like to confuse the two so they can wrap conservative’s objections to fetal stem cell research (which has produced not a single treatment for anything) with the perfectly acceptable (and currently productive) use of adult stem cells for treatment.

43 posted on 10/25/2006 11:42:31 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TracyTucson
"I don't respect him a bit, the whole shaking thing was just a big act for the cameras, after all - acting is his career. "

Me either - did you notice that he wasn't as much shaking, but rocking from side to side when he talked. Whenever he took a breath or stopped talking, he wasn't rocking as hard. But when he started talking, he started rocking. Looked forced, to me.

44 posted on 10/25/2006 11:42:39 AM PDT by jackibutterfly (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC
I thought it was just the groups dragging on the gov. teet that cannot use embryonic cells.

That is what liberals are whining about. They want government funding. The government must fund everything.

It seems to me that if MJ Fox was really concerned about Parkinson's and other disease, he'd cough up some of that dough he made making movies and start a private research fund.

Other rich hollywood types could throw in a few thousand to show their concern as well.

45 posted on 10/25/2006 11:46:41 AM PDT by Last Laugh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

What a mean spirited sentiment. One can only assume that the Democrats are psying the author to make such comments.


46 posted on 10/25/2006 11:49:47 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
I think "embryos" without a modifier could refer to chimp embryos, squid embryos: any embryos. And if we're talking about the production and consumption of human embryos, then "cannibalism" is both species-accurate and rhetorically strong.
47 posted on 10/25/2006 11:53:17 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Mammalia Primatia Hominidae Homo sapiens. Still working on the "sapiens" part.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: tioga

Yes, Fox is wrong. But pursuing it will not help Republicans and gives sympathy votes for the Dems. It's why they use the weak to do their dirty work for them. Their ideas don't work, so they have to play on the emotions of their ranks who don't know how to think.


48 posted on 10/25/2006 11:55:10 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
What a mean spirited sentiment. One can only assume that the Democrats are [paying] the author to make such comments.

Given the level of discourse on display in this thread, I don't think such an assumption is necessary.

49 posted on 10/25/2006 11:55:48 AM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife
Why are these people so hell-bent on destroying embryos when it hasn't produced results?

Do you really have to be told?

This has nothing to do with embryonic stem cells. It has nothing to do with Parkinsons, Alzheimers or Michael J. Fox. It has nothing to do with curing disease.

It is all about Abortion.

The Donks were tired of having their butts kicked over Partial Birth Abortion, so they moved to debate to the other end of the gestational spectrum. Principled Pro-Lifers could no more accept Embryonic Stem Cell Research than they could Partial Birth Abortion, so they took up the challenge. That is why we are talking about this today.

50 posted on 10/25/2006 11:56:05 AM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson