Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gubernatorial Candidate Says She’s The Breast One For The Job
The Stiletto ^ | October 25, 2006 | The Stiletto

Posted on 10/26/2006 3:34:34 AM PDT by theothercheek

Alabama gubernatorial candidate Loretta Nall, 32, hopes that her rack will attract voters to her platform: withdrawal of her state’s National Guard from Iraq; tax credits to send kids to private school or to home schooling them; opting out of the No Child Left Behind Act; decriminalizing pot; and not obeying the Patriot Act and the Real ID Act. Her campaign slogan (illustrated with photos of her impressive cleavage and of her Democrat and Republican opponents) is: "More of these boobs. And less of these boobs."

Posted on her campaign Web site is an explanation of why she does not wear panties. For some reason, The Associated Press felt compelled to make the additional revelation that the Libertarian Party write-in candidate has "dyed blond hair."

As a curvy woman herself, The Stiletto should champion Nall’s campaign. Unfortunately, she thinks Nall’s positions on the issues is a bust.

The Stiletto might take Nall to her bosom, so to speak, if she stuck to the one subject she knows well: big breasts. The centerpiece of her platform should be to force health insurance companies to pony up for breast implants for women who can’t fill a B-cup.

Note: This is the second item in a feature called "The Daily Blade" and it follows an item titled "Iraq Was Supposed To Become Like The USA – But The Reverse Has Happened"


TOPICS: Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: breasts; cleavage; governor; libertarian; thestiletto; thestilettoblog

1 posted on 10/26/2006 3:34:36 AM PDT by theothercheek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

This was worthy of Free Republic, why?
Talk about a Rag Mag Post. (yawn)


2 posted on 10/26/2006 3:40:15 AM PDT by Nav_Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
Variations of this article have been posted already. I believe the conclusion was that her tactics were rather foolish and counterproductive.

Regards, Ivan

3 posted on 10/26/2006 3:42:56 AM PDT by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
The notorious boob t-shirt..


4 posted on 10/26/2006 3:44:40 AM PDT by Jaxter ("Vivit Post Funera Virtus")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nav_Mom

It was funny, I thought. A change of pace from the stuff I usually post on WOT, Muslim extremism, etc.


5 posted on 10/26/2006 3:46:32 AM PDT by theothercheek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

It is pointless to discuss her tactics as she is not even remotely a viable candidate. She is not on the ballot, but is a write-in vote. She has raised less than $25K in campaign money even with her antics. If there is a serious point here - and this post was only for laughs - it's "couldn't the Libertarians find someone better?"


6 posted on 10/26/2006 3:48:55 AM PDT by theothercheek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
I liked it.

I'd hit it.

Wouldn't vote for her though.

prisoner6

7 posted on 10/26/2006 3:49:18 AM PDT by prisoner6 (Right Wing Nuts hold the country together as the loose screws of the Left fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jaxter
Thanks. If she was going to use this tactic you would think she would have really shown her boobs and not just cleavage - which you can see lots and lots of just walking through your local mall. I mean, she doesn't have anything millions of other women have, except perhaps a willingness to flash it. But that's a campaign promise she has already broken.
8 posted on 10/26/2006 3:51:45 AM PDT by theothercheek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Variations of this article have been posted already. I believe the conclusion was that her tactics were rather foolish and counterproductive.

"Counterproductive????" Oh, I guess you disagree that we have a whole bunch of "boobs" on both sides of the political aisle, representing all of us throughout the country?

What would you call them, "asses?"

Gee, you must the life of the party.

Personally, I think her "slogan" is one of the most original and humorous I have seen in a long time

The "boobs" she refers to (on the bottom) could apply to about, oh, I would guess, 10,000 or so politicians holding office throughout the US.

Take a chill pill, friend. Its a joke.

9 posted on 10/26/2006 3:52:50 AM PDT by seasoned traditionalist ("INFIDEL AND PROUD OF IT.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

Sounds like she is on a fast track to be titular head of Alabama.

All kidding aside, she sounds like a dyed in the wool, liberal a-hole, with some libertarian tendencies thrown in for good measure.


10 posted on 10/26/2006 3:53:09 AM PDT by Vaquero ("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
Sorry, but there is absolutely nothing funny about whats at stake this election.
Maybe I'll get my sense of humor back if the democrats lose.
11 posted on 10/26/2006 3:56:36 AM PDT by Nav_Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
Are you a 3rd party protest voter?
Are you voting the Libertarian Party?
12 posted on 10/26/2006 3:57:53 AM PDT by Nav_Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nav_Mom
This was worthy of Free Republic, why?

I've seen worse, like the thread that ran for three days that "men are always thinking about sex". DUH!!! At least this had some humor to it.
13 posted on 10/26/2006 4:01:50 AM PDT by no dems (I'll take a moral Mormon over a demonic Democrat or repugnant RINO anyday.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

She'll be safe in Congess with all the gays.


14 posted on 10/26/2006 4:02:17 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

I saw her on television, and she'd be safe in a Congress filled with alpha males, with an over abundance of testosterone.


15 posted on 10/26/2006 4:06:41 AM PDT by AdvisorB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

If the assets in discussion here are qualification for political aspirations, I saw a gal in our local mall who could be (and should be) running far abreast of HRC.

This woman could cast a political shadow that Ms. Clinton would need a map & compass to find her way out of.

"All politics is yokel", as Wilbur Mills used to say to Fanny Fox.


16 posted on 10/26/2006 5:16:56 AM PDT by RedWireNut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
From her website:

...not too impressive, IMHO......

17 posted on 10/26/2006 8:27:47 AM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nav_Mom

I am a conservative - though everytime I meet a libertarian somewhere (s)he tries to tell me I am really a libertarian. But no two libertarians agree on what libertarians stand for. I know what I stand for.


18 posted on 10/26/2006 5:49:08 PM PDT by theothercheek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

LOL!


19 posted on 10/26/2006 5:49:47 PM PDT by theothercheek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Smorch

alpha males, HAHAHAHAHA, spinless children.


20 posted on 10/26/2006 5:51:19 PM PDT by bmwcyle (Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nav_Mom
No wonder Libertarians will never win a state or federal office.
21 posted on 10/26/2006 5:52:21 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

I know what I stand for.

Most conservatives do. :)


22 posted on 10/26/2006 8:36:41 PM PDT by Nav_Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
"It is pointless to discuss her tactics as she is not even remotely a viable candidate. She is not on the ballot, but is a write-in vote"

All of the above is true....but...I'll bet that Hillary would kill for a pair of boobs like those!

23 posted on 10/26/2006 8:42:06 PM PDT by albee (The best thing you can do for the poor is.....not be one of them. - Eric Hoffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: albee

I think there's a lesbian joke in there somewhere ...


24 posted on 10/27/2006 4:44:14 AM PDT by theothercheek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
If those were brains , I would vote for her!LOL

But maybe she will win audaciously.

She just might be the best man for the job.

25 posted on 07/29/2007 6:32:39 AM PDT by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson