Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cicero

I was only four at the time so I appreciated this history lesson which always seems to be given barely a mention.


10 posted on 10/29/2006 2:57:46 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

This intervention of Eisenhower's may have done more to put an end to European colonialism than any single event in the postwar period.

Maybe that was a good thing, because it got a difficult process over with.

In any case, the whole business has been thrown down the memory hole, because leftists simply cannot admit that the U.S. did more than the U.S.S.R. to end colonialism.

The U.S. never had colonies in the European sense, and it never supported colonialism. We did intervene in places like the Phillipines and Cuba, but not with the intention of building a colonial system like those of Britain and France. But the left simply refuses to admit it, because the U.S. has to be the chief villain.


11 posted on 10/29/2006 3:09:48 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; rmlew

Like you, I was very young (1-1/2 yo) so I have no memory of this time but I think poster rmlew is right on the mark on the unintended consequences that were set in place by the choices made in this time just to avoid looking like an "imperial colonialist" or supporter thereof. In the near-term to this action, it probably emboldened Castro when he nationalized American holdings in Cuba. For the longer-term, the alliances of Arabs to the USSR kept us pinned down as they attempted to overcome Israel.


12 posted on 10/29/2006 3:15:24 PM PST by T-Bird45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson