Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

This intervention of Eisenhower's may have done more to put an end to European colonialism than any single event in the postwar period.

Maybe that was a good thing, because it got a difficult process over with.

In any case, the whole business has been thrown down the memory hole, because leftists simply cannot admit that the U.S. did more than the U.S.S.R. to end colonialism.

The U.S. never had colonies in the European sense, and it never supported colonialism. We did intervene in places like the Phillipines and Cuba, but not with the intention of building a colonial system like those of Britain and France. But the left simply refuses to admit it, because the U.S. has to be the chief villain.


11 posted on 10/29/2006 3:09:48 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero

Well, Puerto Rico was/is a colony in the European sense, one that should have been cut free (like the Phillpines) immediatly after WWII.


14 posted on 10/29/2006 3:39:30 PM PST by Clemenza (I have such a raging clue!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson