Skip to comments.Kerry Apology, Sort Of
Posted on 11/02/2006 3:13:38 PM PST by DesertGOP
Even though youd swear that the usual culprits in the mainstream media had initially self-imposed a collective news blackout concerning the recent Sen. John Kerry blunder of implying to California college students that, if they don't study hard and get a good education, they might get stuck in Iraq, you can bet that the rest of the country wasand still isquick to talk about it. One side seems to be saying, See, I told you so! This is how the Left and how most Democrats feel about our military! The other side, by their earlier deafening silence, either agreed with the Massachusetts politicians comments or couldnt stomach the guts or integrity to call him out on the same. (I guess the Republican Party is the only major political party that eats its own.)
Three things are for sure no matter how you slice the story up: one, you can see how the mainstream press is doing all it can to make this event a non-story (chalking it all up, instead, to more right-wing politics on the eve of mid-term elections); two, Sen. Kerry waited over 24 hours to offer any legitimate, sensible, or unequivocal apologies to the men and women serving in todays Armed Forces and the veterans who served before themthen seemingly offered said apologies begrudgingly; and, three, the Democratic Party leaders and political front-runners before the November 7 elections will avoid even hinting atlike a vampire avoids the proverbial deadly garlicthat John Kerry may have, indeed, meant exactly what he said about the U.S. military as much as a vampire fears the proverbial garlic.
Though, if one were to peruse a number of blogs in the wake of Kerrys comments, they might be surprisedthen, again, maybe notto read many a Democratic Party sympathizer or leftist not only defending the senators remarks, but proud for someone finally standing up and speaking the truth, at least as far as they understand it to be, when it comes to military service, good grades in school, and employment options.
Mr. Kerry claims that, while making the comments hes now being called on the carpet for, he was simply referring to the current Commander in Chief (President Bush)as in, you might get stuck in Iraq (if you dont study hard and get good grades); however, this makes no sense at all upon further inspection, since, if we follow Sen. Kerrys logic, if one were to study hard and get good grades, they would certainly not end up fighting with the U.S. Armed Forces in Iraq, but have the option of pursuing a more safe, prestigious, or respectable occupation back on the mainland. (Italics added to emphasize how Sen. Kerry and most of the Left, along with the leadership of todays Democratic party, probably view any post in the U.S. military anyway.)
So, if John Kerry was referring to President Bush in this matter all alongas he originally claimed he wasthe last time I checked, George W. Bush did, indeed, not only graduate from a major university (Yale), butlet the record showearned higher marks than either Sen. Kerry or one former vice president and presidential candidate, Albert Gore, garneredboth of whom seem to never grow weary of or run out of material painting the president as some sort of dunce or dummy.
Whats the old saying? The pot calling the kettle black.
Correct me if Im wrong, Sen. Kerry, but the president is not conducting business in Iraq (not physically, at least, though we have to admit that the buck does stop at his desk, as well it should). On the other hand, if Sen. Kerry meant that lacking proper study habits and good grades might land one, as a leader of the most powerful nation on earth, bogged down in Iraq due to misguided foreign policiesthen the senator would have certainly bode well to just come out and said what he meant, instead of leaving his backfired joke open for all kinds of interpretations.
And, to make matters worse for him and those Democratic candidates hoping to endear themselves to military families and those who support their efforts, what does he focus on during his initial press conference on this matter? He feeds us all the same old singsong knee-jerk reaction whenever a Democratic politician is caught red handed and is desperately seeking a way to turn the light of truth from themselveshe implies that he is an outright victim of the evil vast right-wing conspiracy, headed up by the all-powerful, all-knowing Darth-Karl Rove and his conniving GOP minions from the Dark Side.
Recent developments give us hope, though, that a smidgen of conscienceor perhaps its more of a matter of political survivalmay still exist in the Democratic Party.
In a blog entry that appears at his JohnKerry.com Web site, the junior senator from Massachusetts offers this statement:
As a combat veteran, I want to make it clear to anyone in uniform and to their loved ones: my poorly stated joke at a rally was not about, and never intended to refer to any troop.
I sincerely regret that my words were misinterpreted (italics added for emphasis) to wrongly imply anything negative about those in uniform, and I personally apologize to any service member, family member, or American who was offended.
Not to disappoint us, Kerry's mea culpa continues with an attack on the Bush administration:
It is clear the Republican Party would rather talk about anything but their failed security policy. I dont want my verbal slip to be a diversion from the real issues. I will continue to fight for a change of course to provide real security for our country, and a winning strategy for our troops.
Kerry's low-key apology stands in sharp contrast to his vocal press conference Tuesday, October 31, in which he blasted his critics for even implying that his comments were controversial.
Perhaps the apology came after some arm-twisting from members of his own Democratic Party less than one week before the midterm elections. Since the story broke, leading Democrats have been trying to distance themselves from Kerry's comments, including Sen. Hillary Clinton, who eventually had to call his comments inappropriate. (After all, no front-running presidential candidate wants to see themselves branded as anti-military between now and 08. She had to say something to separate herself from the Kerry stuck-in-Iraq debacle, if only volunteering a word here or there.)
Bottom line, whether one believes the Bush doctrine in Iraq (and Afghanistan, for that matter) are worthy, a waste of time, or misguided at best, should be irrelevant in this matter. If one were to research this on the Internet, for example, they would clearly discover that those serving in todays Armed Forces are not only some of this countrys bravest and most courageous citizens, but also some of Americas most-educated and academically-honored men and women period!
Shame on Senator Kerry for even implyingthen immediately backtracking from the samethat those who constantly put their lives on the line in dangerous situations are uneducated, go-nowhere morons who have nowhere else to turn to, other than the military, in order to make a decent living. Lets all remember that those serving their country today volunteered to do what they do; they have chosen to take their diplomas, degrees, and doctorates to the front lines, and wherever else they are called, so that those who would rather talk their enemies into surrender can enjoy the freedom to trash our fighting forces and the war they now find themselves a part of.
As a nation, we were right to demand a sincere and full-out apology from the Massachusetts senator to our troops. Whether or not we got that, however, is up for debate.
"Grateful Americans, like mewho are the beneficiaries of soldiers, airman, sailors and marines alike who have spilled their blood, lost limbs, lost lives for freedom and the homelands securitysolicit nothing more than the utmost respect for our men and women in uniform, Senator Kerry. Our troops and veterans deserve nothing less."
Excuse me, the name of the distinguished candidate for governor of California from the Democratic Party is Dumbo.
Kerry's apology consisted in being sorry that his joke was misinterpreted. This is more or less saying that the rest of us are also stupid and should also be stuck in Iraq.
As I always warn my kids, if you don't study hard and do your homework, you might wind up President of the United States!
It's one of those things they all believe, but know they'd be better off keeping quiet. After all, they're going to need that dumb cannon fodder to do their thug work when they get in power.
WHAT ABOUT THE VETERANS JOHN??
This is an apology?????????
johnkerry.com offers this halfheartedly apology to our dimwitted troops in Iraq and their underprivileged families.
As a combat veteran, I want to make it clear to anyone in uniform and to their loved ones: my poorly stated joke at a rally was not about, and never intended to refer to any troop. I sincerely regret that my words were misinterpreted to wrongly imply anything negative about those in uniform, and I personally apologize to any service member, family member, or American who was offended. It is clear the Republican Party would rather talk about anything but their failed security policy. I dont want my verbal slip to be a diversion from the real issues. I will continue to fight for a change of course to provide real security for our country, and a winning strategy for our troops.
John, you apologized to 140 thousand troops and their families. What about the thousand upon thousands of Veterans who have served in uniform since you disgracefully entered the political scene some thirty years ago and began your harangue against the dimwitted, uneducated military members. You, Sir, are a disgrace to the uniform you wore during your three month tour in Vietnam while lost in Cambodia. I, for one, will never forget your disgraceful testimony before Congress while in uniform while our Country was at war. You managed to bamboozle the good citizens of Massachusetts but you havent bamboozled this veteran from the Vietnam era, Senator Kerry. Tom, Colonel, USAF (Retired) a holder of a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, a Master of Science in Business Management, a graduate of Air Force Air Command and Staff College and a graduate of the Industrial College of the Armed Forces
Did you hear his statement the other day? He said he meant to say:
"Do you know where you end up if you don't study, if you aren't smart, if you're intellectually lazy? You end up getting us stuck in a war in Iraq. Just ask President Bush."
So in other words, he is now saying because the troops are stupid they got us stuck in Iraq and Bush knows this. He could have said "Bush is stupid and got us stuck in Iraq" but he didn`t, that`s because he meant the troops, not Bush.
He is no Johnny Carson. Not even Jay Leno. Some joke.
Kerryism [Victor Davis Hanson]
Kerry surely must be one of the saddest Democratic liabilities around. Some afterthoughts about his latest gaffe, which is one of those rare glimpses into an entire troubled ideology:
(1) How could John Kerry, born into privilege, and then marrying and divorcing and marrying out of and back into greater inherited wealth, lecture anyone at a city college about the ingredients for success in America? If he were to give personal advice about making it, it would have to be to marry rich women. Nothing he has accomplished as a senator or candidate reveals either much natural intelligence or singular education. Today, Democrats must be wondering why they have embraced an overrated empty suit, and ostracized a real talent like Joe Lieberman.
(2) How could Kerry possibly claim that he was thinking of the uneducated in the context of George Bush, who, after all, went to Harvard and Yale?
(3) Some of the brightest and most educated Americans are not only in the military, but veterans of Iraq. Two of the best educated minds I have met-Col. Bill Hix and Lt. Col. Chris Gibson, both Hoover Security Fellows-were both Iraqi veterans. What is striking about visiting Iraq is the wealth of talent there, from privates to generals. Without being gratuitously cruel, the problem of mediocrity is not in the ranks of the military, but on our university campuses, where half-educated professors and non-serious students killing time are ubiquitous. Personally, I'd wager the intelligence of a Marine Corps private any day over the average D.C. journalist. Every naval officer I met at the USNA, without exception, seemed brighter than John Kerry, whose "brilliance", after all, has managed to offend millions of voters on the eve of a pivotal election. If the Democrats lose, it will be almost painful to watch the recriminations against Kerry fly.
(4) This is not the first, but third, time he has denigrated soldiers in the middle of a war-and there is a systematic theme: John Kerry's assumed superior morality allows him to pass judgment from on high about supposedly lesser folk who become tools of a suspect military: thus we go from limb-loppers and Genghis' hordes to terrorists to dead-beats. The only constant is that the haughtiness is always delivered in the same sanctimonious, self-righteous, and patronizing tone.
(5) The mea culpa that Democrats are blaming the war and not the warriors is laughable after Sens. Durbin, Kennedy, and Kerry have collectively compared American soldiers to Nazis, Pol Pot's killers, Stalinists, terrorists, and Baathists.
(6) The problem is that Kerry is not just a senator, but the most recent presidential candidate of the Democratic Party, and thus in some sense, especially given the diminution of Howard Dean, the megaphone of the entire party.
(7) His pathetic clarification, as he blamed everyone from Tony Snow to Rush Limbaugh, displayed the same Al Gore derangement syndrome, and thus raises a larger question: what is it about George Bush that seems to reduce once sober and experienced liberal pros to infantile ranting?
(8) And why is the supposedly lame Bush so careful in speech, and the self-acclaimed geniuses like a Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, or Howard Dean serially spouting ever more stupidities? For all the Democrats' criticism of George Bush, I can't think of a modern President who has so infrequently put his foot in his public mouth, and, by the same token, can't think of any opposition that on the eve of elections seems to have an almost pathological death wish.
The Democrats should use this occasion to have an autopsy of Kerryism, or this strange new tony liberalism, that has turned noblisse oblige on its head. It used to be that millionaire FDRs and JFKs felt sympathy for those of the lower classes and wished to ensure that the hoi polloi had some shot at the American dream. But today's elite liberals-a Howard Dean, Al Gore, Ted Kennedy, George Soros, Ted Turner-love the high life and playact at being leftists simply because they are already insulated from the effects of their own nostrums that always come at someone poorer's expense while providing them some sort of psychological relief from guilt. Poor Harry Truman must be turning over in his grave-from bourbon, cigars, and poker to wind-surfing and L.L. Bean costume of the day says it all.
Thank you for your service and DIS-proving Kerry's remarks. You're darn right he meant what he said!
I heard Medved talk about all of the Bush-hating, Leftist, Dem blogs today and how many of them are actually giving Kerry a hefty pat-on-the-back for telling it like it is (as far as they're concerned).
I served in the Air Force, as well (Barksdale AFB in Louisiana in the late-seventies.) Now, at 46, I'd join back up on a heartbeat to be with the guys and gals in Iraq and Afghanistan (see, I'm former military, and I think I did, indeed, spell that country correctly!).
All the best!!!
If he's sorry about anything, it's only that he made things difficult for his party so close to midterm elections. His apology doesn't mean squat.
someone typed an apology on the web. i bet karry (sic) is not even in this country. on the slopes some where
he is a moron.
I heard him say those words on an ABC radio news item. It was Kerry no doubt about it. It is an ability of his to say such a thing and clearly mean the opposite. He is sorry only in the way that the N Kor hereditary dictator is sorry for the nuke test. He is sorry the reaction was other than what he expected.