Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hipaatwo

Depends on whether it was documents that dated from the pre-GWI program or not, really.


15 posted on 11/02/2006 8:14:00 PM PST by Strategerist (Those who know what's best for us must rise and save us from ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Strategerist

And of course the article is out, and it is indeed documents from the pre-1991 Iraqi program.


21 posted on 11/02/2006 8:16:31 PM PST by Strategerist (Those who know what's best for us must rise and save us from ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Strategerist
Here's the money quote, by the NYT, in it's very own words:

Among the dozens of documents in English were Iraqi reports written in the 1990’s and in 2002 for United Nations inspectors in charge of making sure Iraq abandoned its unconventional arms programs after the Persian Gulf war. Experts say that at the time, Mr. Hussein’s scientists were on the verge of building an atom bomb, as little as a year away.

It doesn't get any sweeter than this. NYT confirms Bush was right on WMD!

73 posted on 11/02/2006 8:32:39 PM PST by LikeLight (RYMB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Strategerist
Depends on whether it was documents that dated from the pre-GWI program or not, really.

No, not really. If they had the documents with the instructions, they could have obviously built what they needed at any time given the right materials.

206 posted on 11/02/2006 9:34:44 PM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson