So then explain why this info was bad to have on the site?
The info was found in Iraq in 2003.
The antiwar crowd is going to have to argue that the information somehow wasnt dangerous in the hands of Saddam Hussein, but was dangerous posted on the Internet. It doesnt work. It cant be both no threat to America and yet also somehow a threat to America once its in the hands of Iran.
Maybe the Pubs were going to show papers right before the election that PROVES there were WMD and the NYTimes is heading the info off at the pass........