Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Operation Merlin: Bill Clinton and CIA Blunder Gave Iran Blueprints for Nuclear Bomb
californiachronicle. ^ | April 14, 2006 -- relevant again | Jim Kouri, CPP

Posted on 11/03/2006 12:34:25 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Last night, radio talk show host and former US Justice Department official Mark Levin shocked many listeners when he reported that President Bill Clinton gave nuclear technology to the Iranians in a harebrained scheme.

He said that the transfer of classified data to Iran was personally approved by then-President Clinton and that the CIA deliberately gave Iranian physicists blueprints for part of a nuclear bomb that likely helped Tehran advance its nuclear weapons development program.

The CIA, using a double-agent Russian scientist, handed a blueprint for a nuclear bomb to Iran, according to a new book "State of War" by James Risen, the New York Times reporter, who exposed the Bush administration's controversial NSA spying operation, claims the plans contained fatal flaws designed to derail Tehran's nuclear drive.

But the deliberate errors were so rudimentary they would have been easily fixed by sophisticated Russian nuclear scientists, the book said.

The operation, which took place during the Clinton administration in early 2000, was code named Operation Merlin and "may have been one of the most reckless operations in the modern history of the CIA," according to Risen.

It called for the unnamed scientist, a defector from the Soviet nuclear program, to offer Iran the blueprint for a "firing set" -- the intricate mechanism which triggers the chain reaction needed for a nuclear explosion.

He had been told by CIA officers that the Iranians already had the technology detailed in the plans and that the ruse was simply an attempt by the agency to find out the full scope of Tehran's nuclear knowledge.

But, contrary to orders not to open the packet, he added a note which made it clear he could help fix the flaws for money.

Risen states in his book, "It's not clear who originally came up with the idea, but the plan [to give Tehran nuclear blueprints] was first approved by Clinton."

This is just another chapter in the Bill Clinton saga of giving weapons technology to enemies of the United States. He's provided missile technology to the Chinese, which increased the accuracy of their ballistic missiles, and he provided nuclear technology to the North Koreans that eventually enabled them to develop nuclear weapons.

Risen said the Clinton-approved plan ended up handing Tehran "one of the greatest engineering secrets in the world, providing the solution to one of a handful of problems that separated nuclear powers such as the United States and Russia from rogue countries such as Iran that were desperate to join the nuclear club but had so far fallen short."

Mark Levin, director of the Landmark Legal Foundation, said that thanks to Clinton Iran was able to "leapfrog one of the last remaining engineering hurdles blocking its path to a nuclear weapon."

Ironically, Risen's New York Times has declined to cover Mr. Clinton's Iranian nuclear debacle -- concentrating instead on his book's dubious claims that the National Security Agency was first authorized to commence domestic wiretapping by President Bush, according to NewsMax and Levin.

NewsMax stated that Risen's report could also have a serious implications for Sen. Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign. Mrs. Clinton has been sharply critical of President Bush's handling of the Iranian nuclear crisis, complaining that a nuclear-armed Tehran would be a much more serious threat to the US than Iraq. However, NewsMax may be proven wrong about Sen. Clinton if the news media continue to ignore this story.

"Don't hold your breath waiting for the elite media to create a frenzy over this story. They will never hurt either Clintons with such a damning report," says former intelligence officer Sid Francis.


 

 

 

 

 



TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cia; clintonfailures; clintonlegacy; clintonscandals; hillary; iran; iraniannukes; iraq; marklevin; russianspy; saddamnuke; talkradio; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-52 next last

1 posted on 11/03/2006 12:34:28 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Yesterday the NY Times published an article:

U.S. Web Archive Is Said to Reveal a Nuclear Primer

2 posted on 11/03/2006 12:37:54 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat; jveritas; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; Marine_Uncle; blam; SunkenCiv; ...

Some history....


3 posted on 11/03/2006 12:38:48 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
OK, so Clinton armed the PRC AND Iran.

Beautiful. Hey, I'll bet the ex-POTUS was more destructive to this country than JOHN WALKER.

4 posted on 11/03/2006 12:39:21 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Good grief!


5 posted on 11/03/2006 12:40:14 PM PST by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

--NewsMax stated that Risen's report could also have a serious implications for Sen. Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign.--

So this will come out again as a 2008 November Surprise.


6 posted on 11/03/2006 12:41:00 PM PST by rfp1234 (I've had it up to my keyster with these leaks!!! - - - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
One silver lining: when the MSM spikes this story, the New Media will take it up in earnest.

The MSM death timetable will be stepped-up considerably....at least.

7 posted on 11/03/2006 12:41:13 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
Time for this:

******************

There is a book (now available in paperback ):

***********************

Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left
(Hardcover)
by David Horowitz

********************************************************

And reviews:

****************************************

Editorial Reviews

Rich Lowry, Editor National Review

David Horowitz is synonymous with pyrotechnics. A historian and polemicist of the first order, he is paid the ultimate compliment --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.

Davis Hanson, Author, Ripples of Battle

An original look at those who want us to fail in the Middle East, both at home and abroad. The --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.

***********************************************************

See all Editorial Reviews

Fascinating Analysis of Leftist Goals, August 13, 2006

Reviewer: N. Sincerity - See all my reviews

A former 1960s radical, Horowitz is well-acquainted with the Leftist mindset. In this book, he strives to explain the modern alliance between left wing progressivists and radical Islamofascists. He argues that this alliance is based on a common desire to destroy Western capitalism. Leftist sympathy with Islamofascist ideas makes no sense from an intellectual point of view, given that countries ruled by radical Islamists are among the most racist, sexist, theocratic states in the world today. However, Leftists have recognized that they can benefit politically from destructive terrorist attacks on the Western world. A West under attack can be made to turn on its leaders in fear and desperation (as they did in Spain after the Madrid train bombings). Only once people reject current government structures can the Left execute its anti-capitalist revolution and build a new reality that mirrors the Leftist view of utopia. The complete and utter idealogical hypocrisy of the Islamofascist-Leftist alliance is distressing, but as Horowitz reminds us, Leftists radicals truly believe the ends justify the means.

***************************************

8 posted on 11/03/2006 12:42:18 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sofaman; tiredoflaundry; AliVeritas; defconw; Fudd Fan; Just Lori; IslandJeff; MarkLevinFan; ...

Levin Ping


9 posted on 11/03/2006 12:42:46 PM PST by llevrok (How can you plant the seed of freedom by pulling out early?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
Gotta love that Bubba!
10 posted on 11/03/2006 12:43:19 PM PST by blues_guitarist (I apologize to no one! . .. . . . . . . . .. Black conservative Christians arise!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

For all the talk about how complicated the firing block on a nuclear weapon is, nobody in the nuclear club (with the possible exception of North Korea) has had a first test of a nuclear device fail. All it is is a device that makes sure electrical impulses get to detonators at the correct time. It's about as complicated as a distributor cap. Why, a competent shade-tree mechanic could probably build one.


11 posted on 11/03/2006 12:45:17 PM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Earlier FR threads:

Saddam Surat #2 - Saddam Was Within 3 Months of A-Bomb Before Gulf War I
The Pasadena Pundit ^ | December 3, 2005 | Wayne Lusvardi

12 posted on 11/03/2006 12:45:53 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I just told my classmates I hate that SOB. As if I need a reason to hate him even more...


13 posted on 11/03/2006 12:48:43 PM PST by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Thank me, I'm welcome!


14 posted on 11/03/2006 12:49:02 PM PST by ichabod1 (Vote Republican -- if only to hear The Squealing of the Rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I recall some discussions from 1992, when the Arkansas bumpkin slithered onto the national scene. People were saying the same thing then as they are now - "we need change".....

Well, with the help of Ross Perot (twice) we had 8 years of CHANGE

And now the same folks are calling for 'change' again???????

15 posted on 11/03/2006 12:49:17 PM PST by ErieGeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

I thought Pakistan's first detonations were problematic (partial, due to timing errors).


16 posted on 11/03/2006 12:49:27 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All
Thread regarding a 1995 meeting with terrorists:

State-Sponsored Terrorism, Anyone? (Osama-Saddam)
American Spectator ^ | 3-31-06 | Laurie Mylroie with Ayad Rahim

17 posted on 11/03/2006 12:50:44 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Yep your right, so why is x-pres bj klinton out walking around????


18 posted on 11/03/2006 12:53:47 PM PST by HarleyLady27 (My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Excellent post, Ernest!

Too bad we won't be reading it in the NYT or LAT! LOL

BUMP FOR LATER READING!

Have a good weekend, ya'll!


19 posted on 11/03/2006 12:53:48 PM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
I thought Pakistan's first detonations were problematic (partial, due to timing errors).

I'm told by a retired nuke-u-leer weapons designer that a timing problem would be a complete fizzle (fractional yield) for an unboosted nuke. If you get a significant partial yield with a timing problem, it means the weapon was boosted--and that in itself means that Pakistan's debut weapon was more advanced than anyone knew.

20 posted on 11/03/2006 12:54:31 PM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
No way! Joe Wilson VERIFIED that Saddam wasn't looking for Yellowcake. I mean he and Valerie Plame PROVED it. How could this be possible?
21 posted on 11/03/2006 12:56:26 PM PST by .cnI redruM (We can leave the battle field, but the battle field will not leave us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I'd give AQ Khan and his private Nuclear network more credit for any Iranian bomb than I would Bill Clinton.


22 posted on 11/03/2006 1:16:36 PM PST by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

No blunder.


23 posted on 11/03/2006 1:18:27 PM PST by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (Left + Jihad. The alliance that seeks to eliminate Western Civilization, and us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I got a feeling WE are gonna see that wagging finger again!


24 posted on 11/03/2006 1:24:26 PM PST by ustanker (Vote on the 7th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach; Howlin; Miss Marple

More Clinton tracks.


25 posted on 11/03/2006 1:56:47 PM PST by Carolinamom ("I don't have time to be fingerpointing." ---President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Folk Bill Clinton and all his friends.


26 posted on 11/03/2006 2:02:06 PM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys-Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Clinton...!! I'm not surprised that he would do this, just that no one stopped him from doing it. And they blame the Republicans, as always.


27 posted on 11/03/2006 2:06:51 PM PST by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The CIA, using a double-agent Russian scientist, handed a blueprint for a nuclear bomb to Iran, according to a new book "State of War" by James Risen, the New York Times reporter, who exposed the Bush administration's controversial NSA spying operation, claims the plans contained fatal flaws designed to derail Tehran's nuclear drive.

Wow, that's quite a "sentence."

28 posted on 11/03/2006 2:09:18 PM PST by xjcsa (John Kerry is a despicable person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
Good afternoon.
"I'd give AQ Khan and his private Nuclear network more credit for any Iranian bomb than I would Bill Clinton."

Who will turn out to be the most useful to the Iranians in developing the bomb is less relevant to me than the simple fact that a President of the United States has willingly given militarily significant technology to nations that have declared themselves to be our enemy.

I'm worried that bill clinton's legacy will be thousands of dead Americans.

Michael Frazier
29 posted on 11/03/2006 2:43:36 PM PST by brazzaville (no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Just one small component in a long time of ATTACKS on America... 

Democrat = (D)EVIL

  · DNC China Threat
  · DNC Corruption
  · DNC Racism
  · DNC Treason
  · DNC Vote Fraud

30 posted on 11/03/2006 3:14:10 PM PST by woodb01 (ANTI-DNC Web Portal at ---> http://www.noDNC.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brazzaville
Clinton's legacy is ARLEADY thousands of dead Americans.
31 posted on 11/03/2006 3:21:14 PM PST by Luircin (Bushbot (n, adj.): The first and last argument of a more-conservative-than-thou Rat in disguise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: brazzaville
Clinton's legacy is ALREADY thousands of dead Americans.
32 posted on 11/03/2006 3:23:57 PM PST by Luircin (Bushbot (n, adj.): The first and last argument of a more-conservative-than-thou Rat in disguise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Some history...."
Thanks Ernie. Quite interesting to say the least.
In a way I don't place fault on the Slick one regarding this issue.
He was sold a bill of goods that probably was a "slam donk".
He took the advice of his advisors, CIA, probably some military high ups to go ahead with the deal. This exact scenario could have played out in any administration whether demorat or republican, with the same end results.
Sounds like the fault has to lie within the group of scientist/engineers that gave the go ahead with the cook book to be delivered, for not being a lot more clever in how the information was presented. So on this one. I give Slicko a pass.
Of course the bastard still should be walking around with a chain and ball for all those deals he had with the commies over the years. I make no excuse for his general neglect concerning national security issues amoung a lot of other things.
33 posted on 11/03/2006 6:17:12 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
He said that the transfer of classified data to Iran was personally approved by then-President Clinton and that the CIA deliberately gave Iranian physicists blueprints for part of a nuclear bomb that likely helped Tehran advance its nuclear weapons development program.

Rovember surprise!

34 posted on 11/03/2006 7:25:09 PM PST by pray4liberty (School District horrors: http://totallyunjust.tripod.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The problem is this is not a scandal ,this was Standard policy under the Bubba administration. Madeline Halfbright was quoted at a forum that it was UNFAIR that the United States was the worlds only superpower .
So what do you expect Bubba to do , he personally set out to rectify that situation.
I am sorry I dont remember where it was that Albright made that statement but I heard it with my own ears. Maybe a nexus search will turn that up ,but I tremble at the thought at what else might not be fair for us to be Number 1 in ,Probably just existing.


35 posted on 09/27/2007 3:41:36 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ballplayer; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; Marine_Uncle; doug from upland; kellynla
Thanks for bringing this back....

Looks like Hillary is gaining on the Democratic nomination.....time to remember some of the achievements of her spouse.,....

36 posted on 09/27/2007 8:43:04 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat; jveritas; blam; SunkenCiv
Memory ping!
37 posted on 09/27/2007 8:46:02 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...

Clinton: “We’ll give them a flawed set of plans for a nuclear bomb! That way, it will just blow up when they want to use it!”

Rest of Clinton Administration: “Great idea, Mister President! Cigar?”

Oh, that big 1982 Siberian explosion?
Fort Worth Star-Telegram / The New York Times | 2/3/04 | William Safire
Posted on 02/04/2004 12:13:42 AM EST by Valin
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1071087/posts

[snip] In our complex disinformation scheme, deliberately flawed designs for stealth technology and space defense sent Russian scientists down paths that wasted time and money... “The pipeline software that was to run the pumps, turbines and valves was programmed to go haywire,” writes Reed, “to reset pump speeds and valve settings to produce pressures far beyond those acceptable to the pipeline joints and welds. The result was the most monumental non-nuclear explosion and fire ever seen from space.” ...Farewell stayed secret because the blast in June 1982, estimated at three kilotons, took place in the Siberian wilderness, with no casualties known. Nor was the red-faced KGB about to complain publicly about being tricked by bogus technology. But all the software it had stolen for years was suddenly suspect, which stopped or delayed the work of thousands of worried Russian technicians and scientists. [unsnip]

Thanks Ernest.


38 posted on 09/27/2007 9:18:12 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Wednesday, September 12, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Looks like Hillary is gaining on the Democratic nomination.....time to remember some of the achievements of her spouse.,....

From November 2005, this article excerpt seems appropriate:

"Clinton said the U.S. can't kill or jail all of its enemies, and should work to create more partners and fewer foes. He said once China and India become as prosperous as the U.S., they will determine whether America remains the only superpower.

"We should be trying to build a world, at this unique moment in history, that we would like to live in when we're not the only big dog on the block," Clinton said."

He wasn't just referring to the economic ascendancy of China or India (*expletive deleted*).

39 posted on 09/27/2007 9:18:24 AM PDT by Charles Martel (The Tree of Liberty thirsts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

I am sorry I misquoted Madeline Halfbright, The actual quote was It is unfair that the United States is the Worlds only NUCLEAR power . Bubba set about to rectify that with Loral and all the chinese Commies.Sorry for the Mistake


40 posted on 09/27/2007 4:07:04 PM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

For some reason, I’m neither shocked nor surprised.


41 posted on 09/27/2007 4:11:43 PM PDT by null and void (<---- Awake and filled with a terrible resolve...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Let’s see now. Slick gave nuke stuff to North Korea and Red China. Now he gives nuke stuff to the Iranians. Does anyone see treasonous behavior here by the then president of the United States? Has any US president ever given so much aid and comfort to our enemies than Bill Klinton? Yet, he is a hero to a bunch of weird minded stinking pig liberals.
42 posted on 09/27/2007 4:15:04 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (America's stupidity is overshadowed only by its pure stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
Yet, he is a hero to a bunch of weird minded stinking pig liberals.

If you are a democrat president of the United States of America, you CANNOT be a traitor. If you have an R behind your name, everything you DO is illegal. Get it now?
BTW, he is only a "hero" to communists and perverts.

43 posted on 09/27/2007 4:23:44 PM PDT by jcparks (Claire, Its time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The hits just keep on coming out....as hard as the goon tries to hide his unbelievable treason...the more comes out...his legacy will be the most treasonous president of all time...and there just ain’t nothing he can do about it....hildabeast will remain and old hateful lesbian senator...am hoping the citizens of NY state will wake up and get rid of her...


44 posted on 09/27/2007 4:32:54 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle

Good point. However, I would imagine that if GHW Bush had been President when the CIA came up with this harebrained scheme, the former CIA Director might have had a second thought about it, and challenged the spooks a little more than Old Slick did.


45 posted on 09/27/2007 4:57:55 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (The Democrat Party: radical Islam's last hope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

But we do have to consider the past few years of verifiable evidence pointing to a less then effective CIA. A point is reached where a POTUS must decide if he believes the credibility of his Intel Agencies merit the risk of allowing certain things to be pulled off. We can go back in time and see quite a few royal screw ups by the CIA regardless of who was in the WH.


46 posted on 09/27/2007 6:17:45 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Duncan Hunter for POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Bold strike

another fyi


47 posted on 09/27/2007 6:20:48 PM PDT by mathluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brazzaville
"I'm worried that bill clinton's legacy will be thousands of dead Americans"

It has happened already (the al Q attacks of 1990's, WTC & and the 3000+ US losses in Iraq and Afghanistan.) The legacy that just keeps on giving. But I know you're referring to a nuke attack. I think that's only a matter of time also. What a guy that Bubba.

48 posted on 09/27/2007 7:25:26 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

Did you see this thread?


49 posted on 09/28/2007 8:42:47 PM PDT by Seadog Bytes (OPM - The Liberal 'solution' to every societal problem. (Other People's Money))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

.


50 posted on 09/16/2012 8:45:49 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson