Has Jurk Jack Murtha read this artical?
Posted on 11/03/2006 3:57:04 PM PST by CWOJackson
Entering the weekend before his midterms, George Bush and his party appear fated to lose the House they have held for a dozen years. The Senate is on a knife's edge.
The latest polls continue to show that by 52 percent to 37 percent Americans wish to see a Democratic takeover. Approval of Congress has never been lower. Americans think the nation is on the wrong track. Support for the war in Iraq has collapsed to a third of the nation.
What went wrong? Certainly, on three traditional Republican issues – strong military, conservative judges and lower taxes – the GOP remains America's Party.
How do we know? Because no Democrat in a close race is calling, Mondale-like, for higher taxes or attacking Bush for elevating judges John Roberts and Sam Alito to the Supreme Court. In the tight Senate races in Tennessee and Virginia, Democratic nominees Harold Ford and Jim Webb are outspokenly pro-defense.
On immigration, where Bush aligns with Kennedy-McCain, his party has abandoned him. The Republican House stands for border security, no amnesty and no new guest-worker program. Nor is this a losing issue. Even Hillary Clinton voted for 700 miles of security fence on the Mexican border.
What, then, are the causes of Republican malaise?
First is the perception the GOP is no longer a virtuous party that seeks to live up to principles and a high standard of public ethics. The adventures of the Abramoff Gang, Mark Foley, Duke Cunningham and his poker-party pals, of pork barrel and bridges to nowhere have demoralized the Republican base and disgusted Middle America. There is a feeling, even on the right, that if this crowd is run out of Dodge, its expulsion will not be unwarranted.
Second, while the macro economy seems to be firing on all eight cylinders – the Dow has risen above 12,000, and the Misery Index of inflation plus unemployment has fallen to the lowest levels in modern times – not all Americans are participating in the prosperity.
Employment in health care has grown by almost 2 million, but some 3 million manufacturing jobs have vanished. There has been a population explosion among billionaires, but the real median wage of a male worker has not risen in decades. The daily closure of factories here, as more and more Chinese goods show up at Wal-Mart, points to inescapable consequences: The price of the GOP's free-trade-uber-alles ideology is the loss of the Reagan Democrats.
In Ohio, which was indispensable to Bush is 2000 and 2004, free trade is a millstone around the GOP neck. If Bush loses the House or Senate, free-trade globalism goes on the shelf. Not only will Bush fail to win congressional support of a Doha Round trade treaty, he will be denied any renewal of fast-track authority. The new Congress will not rubber stamp trade treaties, but demand a voice and votes on any new deal the Bushites negotiate on behalf of Corporate America.
But if Republicans are swept from power, the reason will be Iraq. By two to one, Americans have reached the conclusion that the war was a mistake, that taking down Saddam was not worth the price in blood, that the management of the war has been as botched as John Kerry's joke, that it is time to bring the troops home and let Iraqis do the fighting for their own freedom, democracy and independence.
And the more seats Republicans lose Tuesday, the greater will be the pressure on the party and president to find an early exit.
Yet about the war, America remains divided and conflicted. For the roaring Republican reception to Bush's calls for "victory" testifies to another truth. While most American wish we had never gone in and want out, America does not want to lose the war as we lost Vietnam.
Neither party knows a way to accomplish what America wants: to leave Iraq without losing the war. And the reason neither party knows how to do it is because it cannot be done. Like a patient suffering from cancer, we want an end to the "chemo" – the awful news daily coming out of Iraq – but we do not want the consequences.
What, then, has cost the Republican Party its patrimony?
The answer is, first, hubris. Dominating Congress for a dozen years, the GOP began to behave with the same haughtiness as those they displaced. They forgot who sent them here, and why.
Second, ideology. Bush Republicans refuse even to reconsider, despite contradictory evidence, what their ideology teaches: that free trade is best, that U.S. power is invincible, that all the world wants to be like us, that our motives are always pure and theirs malevolent.
Tuesday will bring the party back to earth. But it will not solve the crises that beset the country. For while the Democrats may be the political alternative, the Democrats' ideology of big government liberalism is even more bankrupt.
Pat who?
Isn't this guy a racist? /lol
Buchanan has Paul Craig Roberts Syndrome.
He's some old hack who's been bitter since being fired by President Reagan. He now spends all his time free lancing for the Democrats and shilling for Islamic extremists.
No, he's not bitter...
Folks, it is NORMAL to lose 16 or more House seats during a mid-term election that falls in the 2nd term of a 2 term President.
We're going to crawl over broken glass to vote GOP, and then we're going to make fun of cut-and-run Pat.
Why would anybody trust a dem
http://www.cafenetamerica.com
Horrible column by Pat. The Mods should yank it, IMO.
That's, "Patrick J. Who?".
Not bitter, just insane.
Amen....Pat went soooo far to the right, he met up with the looney left!
This election is too important to write it off as a loss (as the staff of MSDNC would like us to do), If Dems take the House and Senate, we can say goodbye to Conservative judges.
Pat lives in an alternate plane of existence.
Forgot to mention that the economy is in the tank, taxes are sky high, inflation is out of control, unemployment is soaring...oops...sorry, wrong thread!
Actually - the average is ** 35 ** losses in house, 7 in Senate
With friends like Pat Buchanan, the GOP doesn't enemies.
Well, to his credit, if there is one thing Pat is an expert on it is losing elections. But that only makes him an expert at losing. And the only people who still listen to him are those interested in...losing.
Actually - the average is ** 35 ** losses in house, 7 in Senate
This fellow acts like the election is over. Don't listen to stuff like this. It's MSM psyops and black propoganda.
Get out and vote on Tuesday and get your Republican friends to do the same. (Liberals vote on Wednesday.)
So, see? People should not be panicking because the Dems what you to.
Go Pat Go....Just Go Away! We have a news talker on a local station in the DFW area that has this clown on whenever he can which is a signal for me to change stations or go and sort socks.
Not with the way the GOP has gerrymandered districts.
Even a 20-25 gain would be big because of the gerrymandering.
Go Pat, Go to Hell!
Nice house :)
Buchanan hasn't been relevant since the last century.
I said weeks ago that we would hold both houses but lose some ground. I still think that is true.
Pat is right from time to time, but he is more help to the Left than to conservatives.
But pat is a TRUUUUUUEEEE conservative...he's written books about it.
I wish I could get my hands on his 2000 article "Why Patrick J. Buchanan is Losing"
Pat is only a conservative to those who goose step with him.
Alot of what Pat says is true but he leaves out the factor of Hillary, Nancy, Johnny, Al baby and a bunch more are making people puke and the Dems are constanly exposing their ugly underbellies that turn voters away.
pat hardly ever mentions the likes of those Democrats...he's too busy attacking the President and defending Islamic extremists.
I'm afraid that we will all be sick on Tuesday. The sad reality is that most people are pissed at W over Iraq and they want to make his party pay on election day. For the people that are actually predicting House and Senate gains for us, I want what they are drinking. The only bright side of this cycle is that Tennessee(my home state) is going to keep our seat Republican.
I'm not sure I agree with Pat's line about NAFTA, but I strongly believe that we are partially the cause of Mexican illegals, and that's our trade with China. It would be best if we bought all those goods from Americans rather than from China, but NAFTA pretty much makes that impossible. Even then, though, it seems to me inexcusable that we don't get them from Mexico rather than from China. Mexico borders us for crying out loud...it seems to me to be a no-brainer that if we're going to create manufacturing jobs in one of our trading partners, it should be in a neighbor so their people have an incentive to stay there. In this light, buying from China rather than from Mexico is just insane and we really should hold our party's feet to the fire.
Please, allow me........BARF! ;)
Pat is smart, and has always used those smarts to advance his agenda, his bank account, his books, his .........Just fill in the blanks.
As someone who was involved in the Nixon administration, I am very disappointed in Buchannan. There were two other speech writers who worked for President Nixon. Ray Price, the head speech writer, and Ben Stein, no doubt the most loyal of the three. While I don't know the whereabouts of Price, Ben Stein remains true to his principles, and he has done so while having a very lucrative career as a writer and actor.
He'd do everyone a big favor by retiring to an undisclosed location--preferably one without access to the outside world.
I agree with you!
Cheer up. If pat's prediction is anything like his predictions when we went into Afghanistan the GOP will end up with all but six seats in the House and gain five seats in the Senate...from Democratic Senators who aren't even running this election.
Pat's middle name is hubris; he's a washed up, worthless, blabber mouth who will never lead anyone anywhere.
Shut up pat and go away .. you're starting to remind me of Carter
Pat Buchanan...the Fred Phelps of politics.
This is supposed to be a forum.
Forums provide discussion and debate.
Forums to not provide a chorus to be preached to only by approved gurus, savants, or prophets.
I don't agree with the conclusions, or respect PJB; but just like Newtie, he can provide fodder for a debate and his beliefs are not too distantly related to conservatism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.