Posted on 11/04/2006 8:46:08 AM PST by Nasty McPhilthy
Once again, credit where credit is due: This column is the result of a conversation with a friend with whom I often discuss geopolitics – and an exceptionally creepy waking experience I had. This may be one of the weirdest pieces I’ve written; let’s just hope for our sakes that weird is all it is.
Ever wake up with a popular song in your head? Maybe you heard it the night before, or went to sleep with the television on, or it was playing on the clock radio that woke you on a given morning? Well, I can’t recall any of the above, but I awoke this morning with the following verse in my head:
“If you’re going to San-fran-cisco, Be sure to wear some radiation gear…”
Like I said: Very creepy. Which got me to thinking about the aforementioned conversation. My friend and I got to talking about how a large-scale Al-Qaeda attack on American soil just prior to the midterm election would benefit the terrorist group – and stateside far-Lefters – immeasurably.
Think about it. Like Spain, just before their election, trains are bombed on March 11, 2004. The Madrid attacks, which killed 191 people and wounded over 1700, were ostensibly to “protest” Spain’s involvement in the Iraq war coalition. Spain, as we all know, folded like a castanet and the anti-war candidate was swept into office.
Right now, we are set up perfectly for the selfsame scenario. Despite a growing economy, increased security (for all that could be done, suffice it to say we’ve not been attacked since 9/11), crippling of Al-Qaeda and the Taliban, the capture of Saddam Hussein, Al-Zarqawi and dozens of other high-level players, the media and the Democrat public relations machine have just about succeeded in making America the villain in the global War on Terror. Yes, they have a particular passionate hatred for George Bush, but the underlying message is clear: We don’t have the right to meet force with force. Not only do we lack the proactivity, intelligence and Special Ops capability Israel used to employ, but we’ve pressured that nation economically into a state of diminished readiness as well.
So how does San Francisco figure into all this? Well, hopefully no farther than the strange early-morning firing of my neurons. But consider this: The Twin Towers in New York were attacked in 1993 and 2001 specifically because they were a symbol of American economic superiority – something radical Islam hates.
San Francisco is also a symbol of something radical Islam hates: Unbridled and celebrated debauchery. Granted that there is hypocrisy among terrorists; the 9/11 attackers were seen womanizing, drinking and gambling prior to their crimes, hardly the habits of devout Muslim boys. They probably wouldn’t attack Las Vegas for similar reasons simply because a lot of their wealthy financial benefactors like to play there. Wouldn’t want to inadvertently blow up a bunch of Saudi princes at the blackjack table to make their point, as this could drastically effect their future funding.
Were an attack such as the Madrid train bombings (or worse) to occur prior to November 7, there is no doubt in my mind that those Americans who believe the common cold is the fault of Republicans would be quite satisfied that a “regime change” in America was in order. The Democrats and the media would support this conclusion with gusto.
It is altogether possible however, that the American voters would not go the route of Spain. Perhaps they would become more enraged than after September 11, 2001; political correctness, moral relativity and their aversion to profiling might be pitched through the window like a rowdy barroom drunk. They might look to the President and collectively cry: “Whatever it takes. Enough is enough.”
Still, I can almost hear Nancy Pelosi announcing when the impeachment hearings will start – which could conceivably happen anyway, terrorist attack or no.
We are not Spain. Such an attack would win the election for Republicans, in spades.
We aren't Spain. Don't mess with us.
Why was there no attack in 2004, the first presidential election after 2000... that would have been more sensational? Al Qaeda must be weak.
I think al Queda is already employing a "Madrid strategy" in this election, only with a twist.
The bombs are going off in Baghdad instead of an American city. But al Queda can count on the MSM to put those pictures in our living rooms day after day. They count on the Democrats pounding home their message that America isn't safe and should give up in Iraq.
They don't need to blow up one of our cities. Baghdad will do just fine.
MSM won't go into that..but Bush has destroyed a
lot of the Alqueda murderers and continues to do it..
that will cease when the bleeding hearts get back in
power..but unless we have the Truman charisma...looks
bad for the good guys, including us Freepers...Jake
Your screen name is very descriptive and accurate.
"Such an attack would win the election for Republicans, in spades."
Yes, I agree 100% There is one thing the American people know for a fact, Democrats are weak on law and order, from petty vandalism to international terrorism Dems ALWAYS and EVERYWHERE want to give the bad guys a break. I think (God forbid it) if there were a terrorist attack between now and election day Republicans would win every single race in which they had a candidate, from the dog catchers to the Governship of NY State. Miracle Joe Lieberman would be the only dem to survive.
Strongly disagree with the original post. It's exactly backwards. Al Qaeda would be foolish to attack now, which would inevitably result in a conservative win.
I have wondered if there will be an attack if the dems win the House, Senate, or both. The election will surely be close, and an attack would almost certainly cause political chaos in a divided Nation.
In the words of that great philosopher, Popeye, "Oy. I am what I am. And that’s all that I am."
Personally I think an attack now would be a serious mistake for terrorists.
An attack immediately after a republican win seems more likely to me especially combined with a message explaining that we are being punished for voting republican.
After a democratic win I suspect there would be no immediate attack. In that case I suspect we would be warned to remove troops from the mideast followed by increasing attacks there. Once the democrat retreat is complete the attacks would come to America.
This is completely wrong. The terrorists don’t dare hit us before the elections because that would elect Republicans. Republicans are fighters, Democrats are cutters and runners.
All of us know Democrats are mostly antimilitary. We know this because liberal Democrats have in essence screamed “I hate the military!” as loud as possible over the past several decades. Americans vote for Democrats precisely to the extent they deny the reality of the terrorist threat we face.
The terrorists are cowardly dogs. The Democrats are cowardly and unpatriotic.
There is often, lately, an international test of a new Admin. '06 won't bring a new Admin, so a test isn't necessary: they know what the response will be. The '08 election will bring an international test early in '09.
To a Muslim, so as long as you are the giver and not the reciever, its not a sin. Little boys can play, too...
And as I live right under the Hollywood sign, near the Scientology Celebrity Center, I certainly HOPE they don't hit Hollywood. ;^)
Yes... L.A. and S.F. aren't really the loci of our economy. The movie industry isn't the financial moneymaker it once was, and let's face it... the movie industry is on Al Qaeda's side. I doubt they'll hit Hollywood.
And as I live right under the Hollywood sign, near the Scientology Celebrity Center, I certainly HOPE they don't hit Hollywood. ;^)
1. Western homosexuals and their supporters are generally leftists, and therefore they are the allies of the Muslim extremists, at least at this juncture. Maybe "useful fools" moreso than allies.
2. There are many homosexuals among the militant Muslims.
We're on the same page!
I would hope our reaction would be the exact opposite of Spain's.
This is my theory on AQ attacks.
We suffered attacks repeatedly under Clinton...why, they knew he'd do nothing about it.
GWB is in office about 9 months, and we have an attack. We go to war in Afghanistan, then Iraq...and no more attacks (unless you count the anthrax, and the origin of that is dubious.) I, personally, don't believe we'll suffer another attack as long as GWB is in office because they know what his resolve is (of course, if the Dems take both houses, this prediction could change.)
I think that the next big attack will come after the 2008 Presidential election. No matter if a Republican or a Democrat is elected, they'll attack to test the mettle of the new President.
Just MHO.
* November 9th - Thousands of people forced to relocate, natural disasters, awful weather, beginning and endings of portion of life
* November 18th – Terrorism, dramatic news involving the police, sex, secrets, famous people death and finances
* November 25th – Explosions, earthquakes, news about nukes, electronic, NASA and the universe
My reaction? I promptly turned off the radio and went right to sleep as soon as my head hit the pillow.
It is the American way to pull in under attack, regroup, and respond heavy-handed...not wimp out.
I like the way you talk. Mmm-hmm.
As the president has pointed out, if we leave too soon, they will follow us home. The enemy's first priority is to secure their base from the infidels. They will go after Israel with renewed zeal, because Israel is on lands once moslem controlled.
In any case, the terrorists are already here at home in the US and may not need to risk a huge backlash from further violence. They are doing quite well right now, here, with the help of a pusillanimous press and a sell-out 'rat hierarchy. Every time, eg, you see a CAIR mouthpiece treated with respect on a tv program, you are witnessing a successful application of jihad in America. Every time you see a 'rat line up with the forces of MoveOn and the like, you are witnessing the nation being sold out to anti-American interests by the 'rat party.
Al Quada should attack on Wednesday. If the GOP wins, it's payback. If the Dems win, it's a finger in the eye and, quoteth Nelson, "Ha-Ha!"
"No matter if a Republican or a Democrat is elected, they'll attack to test the mettle of the new President."
If it's a dem, slmost certainly. If it's Rudy Giuliani, well, they'd be fools.
Americans are made of much sterner material ... a terrorist attack on this country a day or two, or, for that matter, on the day of a national election would have the opposite effect ... it would piss off everyone, even timid liberals.
"Were an attack such as the Madrid train bombings (or worse) to occur prior to November 7, there is no doubt in my mind that those Americans who believe the common cold is the fault of Republicans would be quite satisfied that a “regime change” in America was in order."
No, no, no, the US is very much unlike Spain. Now would not be the time for Al-Qaeda to strike. An Al-Qaeda attack would result in a repeat of the 9/11 attack which only brought the country somewhat together. Most democrats may be stupid, but not stupid enough to vote for a "regime change" right after an attack. (Or could I be wrong?) Al-Qaeda should wait untill the Rats own both houses because they know very well that the left would be willing to make major concessions which the Reps will hopefully not make.
If I were an Al-Qaeda chieftain, I would lay low and let the Democrats, Muslim immigrants, CAIR, and the ACLU do the dirty work for me until the country is weak enough to openly attack. If I were really patient I would attack the weak European countries only and wait for the US to self-destruct.
We need to put the hurt to militant Islam no matter where it rears its ugly head; whether here or there, today or tomorrow. Drown it in hot bacon grease.
"I agree with you. Iraq is where they have a large presence."
The Al-Qaeda fighters in Iraq are just cannon fodder and very expendable. The more intelligent terrorists reside in Europe or perhaps even here. Notice that most 9/11 hi-jackers are educated and have European and American connections.
Do you think that an intelligent terrorist is going to fight US Armed Forces in Iraq where he has a good chance to get killed without making a major impact? Iraq is only a minor objective which will fall automatically when Europe or the US are conquered.
The major battle will be fought right here. This is not WWII where there were oceans between us and our enemies and when we did not allow immigration by citizens of enemy countries (Muslims). Our enemies already live among us.
Interesting premise,but San Fran?That bastion of leftist's?I'm of the opinion that we have terrorist cells here in the US,but an attack prior to the mid-terms would(imo)help republicans at the polls.
The leftist moonbats and their enablers in the MSM will declare that the damage was orchestrated by Bush, Rove & company.
Every Muslim, from the moment they realise the distinction in their hearts, hates Americans, hates Jews, and hates Christians. This is a part of our belief and our religion. For as long as I can remember, I have felt tormented and at war, and have felt hatred and animosity for Americans.
Osama bin Laden
And we have Nancy Pelosi insulting the great job our troops are doing building schools, water and electricity for Iraqis by saying Bush's rebuilding efforts are failed and wasteful and ineffective. When was the last time you saw ANY positive segment on rebuilding Iraq or happy Iraqis on any MSM show? Between the terrorists, the journalists and the Democrats, we are surrounded.
G. Gordon Liddy would have a chance at being president..
With Ann Coulter as his Veep... And Micheal Savage as press Secrtetary..
The muzzies know that.. For THEN the muzzies would get all the respect they deserve..
Dear Bush-haters, er antiwar moralists: The USA could end this war in an afternoon with 4 Polaris submarines. Of course it would entail the deaths of 10 to 100 million Muslims. So, if you want a quick end to the war, that'll do it.
Regards,
GtG
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.