Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

97 Reasons Democrats Are Weak On Defense And Can't Be Trusted To Govern In Wartime
Investors Business Daily ^ | Nov. 4, 2006 | IBD

Posted on 11/04/2006 11:48:08 AM PST by FairOpinion

Today's Democrats are nothing like Presidents Roosevelt, Truman and Kennedy, who with courage and decisive action kept on top of their jobs and aggressively confronted one national defense crisis after another.

We're in a war. Something always goes wrong in a war, and our military leaders have made mistakes in Iraq. But quitting and leaving would amount to defeat for the U.S. in the global war on terrorism and create chaos. Quitters never win.

However, (97) when it comes to which party has proved more capable in acting to defend and protect Americans from foreign enemies, there is only one choice. From Johnson to Carter to Clinton, virtually all the defense policies and decisions made by Democratic administrations have been unsuccessful. And in many cases, they have unintentionally but materially increased the danger to our national security and the safety of all Americans.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2006elections; democrats; elections; elections2006; ibd; republicans; shadowparty; wot
Highly recommend to read, bookmark and e-mail to all your friends, then follow up on Tuesday and make sure they all get out and vote Republican!

If there ever was a "must read", this is it. It gives all the blunders of the Dems, which had severe consequences to the country, reminding people what they can expect from a Dem majority. Truly excellent summary!

1 posted on 11/04/2006 11:48:09 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
No blunders there, FReeper.

Just working to turn America over to socialists is what it is all about with those saps!

2 posted on 11/04/2006 11:50:24 AM PST by 100-Fold_Return (In Prisons Tattletales Are the Same as Child-Molesters...hmm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

After hearing Bill Clinton laughing at terrorism and illegal immigration this week, there can be no doubts.


3 posted on 11/04/2006 11:51:05 AM PST by cripplecreek (If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Not all Democrats only the modern Democrats. I would trust Truman, Scoop Jackson or JFK with our security.

But alas the Conservative Democrat is all but extinct.
4 posted on 11/04/2006 11:51:45 AM PST by Mikey_1962 (If you build it, they won't come...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

I've seen it, but I appreciate the internet link. Bookmark!!!


5 posted on 11/04/2006 11:58:43 AM PST by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

The Democrats can't govern in peace time let alone war. Most of the problems we face on a daily basis in America are the result of Democrat short sighted, socialist bent, liberal and childish mental processes.


6 posted on 11/04/2006 12:03:04 PM PST by SeaBiscuit (God Bless America and All who protect and preserve this Great Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

BTTT !


7 posted on 11/04/2006 12:03:58 PM PST by FreeKeys (Ask yourself: "What else can I possibly do to ensure victory on Tuesday?" -- and THEN DO IT !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit

Well put.


8 posted on 11/04/2006 12:09:41 PM PST by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

I would never trust a Kennedy with my security.


9 posted on 11/04/2006 12:14:00 PM PST by Alex1977
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alex1977

I wouldn't trust Kennedy to drive me to the grocery store.


10 posted on 11/04/2006 12:17:17 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Vote REPUBLICAN on November 7th!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Highly recommend to read, bookmark and e-mail to all your friends, then follow up on Tuesday and make sure they all get out and vote Republican! If there ever was a "must read", this is it.

Excellent post; excellent point.
HERE YOU GO -- This might be a little easier to copy into an email message:
------------------------------------------------
 

97 Reasons Democrats Are Weak On Defense And Can't Be Trusted To Govern In Wartime

Posted 11/3/2006 Originally posted on 9/29/06 at INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY here: http://snipurl.com/117yp

Today's Democrats are nothing like Presidents Roosevelt, Truman and Kennedy, who with courage and decisive action kept on top of their jobs and aggressively confronted one national defense crisis after another.

Jimmy Carter, elected during the Cold War with the Soviet Union, and (1) believing Americans had an inordinate fear of communism, (2) lifted U.S. citizens' travel bans to Cuba, North Korea, Vietnam and Cambodia and (3) pardoned draft evaders.

President Carter (4) also stopped B-1 bomber production, (5) gave away our strategically located Panama Canal and (6) made human rights the central focus of his foreign policy.

That led Carter, a Democrat, (7) to make a monumental miscalculation and withdraw U.S. support for our long-standing Mideast military ally, the Shah of Iran. (8) Carter simply didn't like the Shah's alleged mistreatment of imprisoned Soviet spies.

The Soviets, (9) with close military ties to Iraq, a 1,500-mile border with Iran and eyes on Afghanistan, aggressively tried to encircle, infiltrate, subvert and overthrow Iran's government for its oil deposits and warm-water ports several times after Russian troops attempted to stay there at the end of WWII. These were all communist threats to Iran that Carter never understood.

Carter (10) thought Ayatollah Khomeini, a Muslim exile in Paris, would make a fairer Iranian leader than the Shah because he was a religious man. (11) With U.S. support withdrawn, the Shah was overthrown, and (12) the ayatollah returned and promptly proclaimed Iran an Islamic nation. (13) Executions followed. Palestinian hit men were hired to secretly eliminate the opposition so the religious mullahs couldn't be blamed.

Iran's ayatollah (14) then introduces the idea of suicide bombers to the Palestine Liberation Organization and paid $35,000 to PLO families whose young people were brainwashed to attack and kill as many Israeli citizens as possible by blowing themselves up. This inhumane menace has grown unchallenged.

The ayatollah (15) next created and financed with Iran's oil wealth Hezbollah, a terrorist organization that later bombed our barracks in Beirut, killing 241 Marines and sailors. With Iran's encouragement this summer, (16) Hezbollah attacked Israel and started a war that damaged Lebanon and (17) diverted the world's attention from Iran's nuclear bomb program.

In November 1979, Iranians, including (18) Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, their current puppet president who was elected in an unfree, rigged election in which opponents were intimidated into not running, (19) stormed the U.S. Embassy in Tehran and held 52 U.S. personnel hostage for 444 days.

Carter, after nearly six months, (20) belatedly attempted a poorly executed rescue with only six Navy helicopters (three were lost or disabled in sandstorms) and Air Force planes with Delta Force commandos. The mission was aborted, but foul-ups on the ground resulted in a loss of eight aircraft, five airman and three Marines. The bungled plan was never put down on paper for the Joint Chiefs to evaluate. There were practice sessions, but no full dress rehearsal, and pilots weren't allowed to meet with their weather forecasters because someone in authority worried about security.

America (21) can thank the well-meaning but naive and inexperienced Democrat, Jimmy Carter, for a foreign policy that lost a strong military ally, Iran, and (22) put the U.S. at odds with a gangster regime that was determined to build nuclear bombs to wipe Israel off the map and threaten the U.S. and other nations. Iran also has a working relationship with al-Qaida, which also wants nukes. Care to connect the dots?

Shortly after a meeting at which Carter kissed Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev on each cheek, (23) the USSR invaded Afghanistan. Carter the appeaser was shocked. "I can't believe the Russians lied to me," he said.

During the Carter Democrat period, (24) communism was on a rampage worldwide. In an unrestrained country-capturing spree, communists took over (25) Ethiopia, (26) South Yemen (27) located at the mouth of the Red Sea where they could block Mideast oil shipments and access to the Suez Canal), (28) Afghanistan, (29) Angola, (30) Cambodia, (31) Mozambique, (32) Grenada and (33) Nicaragua.

Compared to the pre-Vietnam War defense budget in 1964, Carter requested in fiscal 1982's defense budget (34) a 45% reduction in fighter aircraft, (35) a 75% reduction in ships, (36) an 83% reduction in attack submarines and (37) a 90% reduction in helicopters.

The Soviets for years (38) consistently spent 15% of their GDP on defense; (39) in 1980 we spent under 5%. As a percentage of our government's spending, defense was lower than before Pearl Harbor. No wonder a Republican, Ronald Reagan, had to vastly increase defense spending to help us win the 45-year-old Cold War and relegate the USSR to the ash heap of history — an astounding feat no one (except Reagan) believed possible.

In addition to a communist enemy rapidly expanding its territorial conquests, Reagan (40) inherited from Democratic management a 12% inflation rate (highest in 34 years), (41) 21% interest rates (highest since Abraham Lincoln was president), (42) a depleted military and (43) a serious energy crisis.

For eight years (44) congressional Democrats ridiculed and fought with Reagan and were on the wrong side of nearly all his defense and economic policies. They said he wasn't bright — an "amiable dunce," as party elder Clark Clifford (45) put it. They maintained his tax cuts wouldn't work, (46) that he insulted the Soviets by labeling them the "Evil Empire" (47) and that he was going to start World War III by putting missiles in West Germany to counter new Soviet SS-20 nuclear missiles installed in East Germany. (48) John Kerry wanted a nuclear freeze that would guarantee the Soviets overwhelming tactical nuclear superiority in Europe. (49) Kerry seemed to constantly advise retreating, giving up and handing our enemies what they wanted — a recipe for us to lose every war.

Democrats waffled (50) on Reagan's request for support of Contras who were fighting to stay alive and take Nicaragua back from Daniel Ortega's communist Sandinistas. Each month, the Soviets poured $50 million worth of Russian tanks, anti-aircraft weapons, Hind attack helicopters and munitions into that central American country. 

Democratic leaders (51) all dismissed as a ridiculous pipe dream Reagan's plan for the U.S. to develop a missile that could shoot down incoming enemy missiles. (52) Showing no vision, Democrats mockingly called it Star Wars.

Democratic politicians (53) were proved wrong on virtually every vital Reagan policy. (54) His tax cuts set off a huge seven-year economic boom that created 20 million new jobs. (55) Interest rates tumbled from 21% to 7 1/2%. (56) Inflation nose-dived from 12% to 3%. And (57) oil prices collapsed when — contrary to warnings from Democrats — he removed price controls on natural gas.

Reagan's motto was "Peace through Strength," (58) not peace through weakness and accommodation. With his steadfast determination and perseverance, the communists were kicked out of Grenada and defeated in Nicaragua, Ethiopia and Afghanistan. And for the first time in history Soviet expansion ended.

Reagan (59) never quit exerting pressure on the Soviets. In Berlin, he demanded that Gorbachev "tear down this wall," and in time the Berlin Wall fell. In the end the communist Soviet Union dissolved. The Reagan-Bush administration had won the Cold War.

Years later, (60) a group of Russian generals were asked about the one key that led to the collapse of the USSR. They were unanimous in their response: "Star Wars." Gorbachev feared it would render the Soviets' nuclear missiles obsolete for an overwhelming first strike, and they could not afford to build the hundreds more that would be needed or hope to match America's great technical ability. (61) So Gorbachev threw in the towel after Reagan held firm at Reykjavik and refused to stop SDI research. Years later (62) Gorbachev said he didn't think it could have ever happened if Reagan hadn't been there. 

In July 2001, (63) the U.S. military used an SDI missile launched thousands of miles away and flying at near bullet speed to blow a test missile out of the sky. (64) Democrats from Dukakis to Gore to Kerry all said this would be impossible and that missile defense would never work. They were all wrong. Reagan was right.

The current terrorist threat (65) to U.S. national security did not begin on 9/11, but in the early 1990s. Bill Clinton was elected November 1992. (66) The first bombing of our World Trade Center on Feb. 26, 1993, killed six people and injured 1,000. Terrorists hoped to kill 250,000. (67) Some of the apprehended terrorists were trained in bomb making at the Khalden terrorist camp in Afghanistan.

October 1993. (68) A Somali warlord, with help from weapons and top trainers sent by al-Qaida, shot down two U.S. Blackhawk helicopters. Eighteen Americans were killed and 73 wounded. Clinton, under pressure from a Democratic Congress, ordered retreat and withdrawal of all U.S. forces. Said Osama bin Laden: "They planned for a long struggle, but the U.S. rushed out in shame."

January 1995. (69) Philippine police discovered Ramzi Yousef, mastermind of the World Trade Center bombing, had a plan to blow up 12 American airliners over the ocean and fly a plane into CIA headquarters. They informed Clinton's government of the plot.

Bin Laden (70) tried to buy weapons-grade uranium to develop a weapon that would kill on a mass basis — like Hiroshima. (71) In November 1995, a car bomb exploded at a Saudi-U.S. joint facility in Riyadh, killing five Americans.

June 1996. (72) Khobar Towers, which housed U.S. Air Force personnel in Saudi Arabia, was blown up by Saudi Hezbollahs with help from Iran and some al-Qaida involvement. Nineteen Americans were killed and 372 wounded.

July-August 1996. (73) The U.S. received from senior level al-Qaida defectors intelligence on the creation, character, direction and intentions of al-Qaida.

February 1998. (74) Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahri issued a fatwa declaring "war on America" and making the murder of any American anywhere on earth the "individual duty" of every Muslim.

May 29, 1998. Finally, (75) after a long series of deadly bombings carried out since 1992, and bin Laden calls to attack the U.S., Clinton's CIA created a plan to raid and capture the al-Qaida leader at his Tarnak Farms compound in Afghanistan. After months of planning, consultations with senior officials in other departments and numerous full rehearsals that went well, the raid was called off at the last moment by CIA Director George Tenet and others worried about possible collateral damage and second-guessing and recrimination if bin Laden didn't survive.

Aug. 7, 1998. (76) Al-Qaida blew up U.S. embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam, five minutes apart, killing 200, injuring 5,000.

Now (77) Clinton's team, wanting to take stronger action, decided to fire Tomahawk missiles at bin Laden's training camps as well as a Sudan aspirin factory. (78) But the administration gave up to 48 hours notice to certain people, including the chief of staff of Pakistan's army, so India wouldn't think the missiles were aimed at them. Somehow forewarned, bin Laden and his terrorist leaders all left — no terrorists were killed, but U.S. ineffectiveness was on full display.

Dec. 20, 1998. (79) Intelligence knew bin Laden would be at the Haii house in Kandahar but again passed up the opportunity due to potential collateral damage and the risk of failure. (80) Clinton approved a plan by his national security adviser, Sandy Berger, to use tribals to capture bin Laden. But nothing happened.

Next, (81) the Pentagon created a plan to use an HC 130 gunship, a more precise method, against bin Laden's headquarters, but the plan was later shelved. Lt. Gen. William Boykin, deputy undersecretary of defense, told the 9/11 Commission "opportunities were missed due to an unwillingness to take risks and a lack of vision and understanding."

Feb. 10, 1999. (82) The CIA knew bin Laden would be at a desert hunting camp the next morning, the 11th. But the military failed to act because an official airplane of the United Arab Emirates was there and it was feared an Emirate prince or official might be killed.

May 1999. (83) Detailed reports from several sources let the CIA know that bin Laden would be in Kandahar for five days. Everyone agreed it was the best chance to get bin Laden. But word came to stand down. It was believed Tenet and Clinton were again concerned about civilian collateral damage. A key project chief angrily said three opportunities were missed in 36 hours. October 2000, (84) the USS Cole was bombed, killing 17 U.S. sailors. No action was taken due to concerns expressed by Secretary of State Madeleine Albright.

Americans must learn from history and costly mistakes. Sadly, (85) Democrat Jimmy Carter, a Southern peanut farmer, became our Neville Chamberlain, creating the specific conditions that have brought us the three greatest threats to our national security today: 1) (86) Iran's nuke-bound terrorists; 2) (87) al-Qaida and other terrorists; and 3) (88) North Korea and its nuclear weapons.

Carter's (89) inability to deal with the Soviet communists emboldened them to invade Afghanistan. A 23-year-old bin Laden also was drawn there to recruit young Muslim fighters and build a network to raise money for the anti-Soviet jihad that later became al-Qaida.

Years later, (90) civilian Carter took it on himself to go to North Korea and negotiate a peace agreement that would stop that communist country from developing nuclear weapons. He then convinced Clinton and Albright to go along with it. (91) The signed piece of paper proved worthless, as the Koreans easily deceived Democrats and used our money, incentives and technical equipment to build nuclear bombs and increase the threat we face today.

The Clinton administration (92) had at least 10 chances to get bin Laden, but it repeatedly could not make the decision to act. There were too many people and departments involved, too much confusion and no strong leader to make the tough decisions to act. They were too timid and concerned about repercussions if they failed.

Contrast this inability to take action with Harry Truman's ability to make sound decisions and get results on complex defense issues — from dropping the bomb to end WWII to helping Iran and Turkey stave off the Soviets, from defending Greece from communist takeover following WWII to confronting and beating the Soviet's Berlin blockade with a 14-month night-and-day Berlin airlift, from taking on the North Koreans to ultimately firing the popular Gen. Douglas MacArthur for insubordination.

Further Democratic incompetence in matters of defense emerged from Clinton's attorney general, Janet Reno, and her deputy, Jamie Gorelick. (93) They built a legal barrier that in effect prevented the CIA from sharing intelligence with the FBI before 9/11.

Democrats in the Clinton administration (94) allowed the selling of important defense technology and secrets to the Chinese, who are now engaged in a massive military buildup.

Estimates are that (95) 10,000 to 20,000 terrorists were trained in bin Laden's many camps in the years before 9/11.

Oil is also vital for our national defense. In 1952 we produced 93% of the oil we consumed. Now we depend on the Mideast and others for 66%. Democrats have been largely responsible for this because they have blocked all efforts to drill in Alaska and certain offshore areas estimated to contain 10 billion to 20 billion barrels of crude.

Democrats (96) in Congress condemn current efforts to intercept terrorist phone calls, to mine data to ferret out future attacks against us, and to trace the movement of terrorist money through banks. All the while they want special treatment for enemy prisoners captured on the battlefield. This helps the enemy and undermines our troops in the field.

We're in a war. Something always goes wrong in a war, and our military leaders have made mistakes in Iraq. But quitting and leaving would amount to defeat for the U.S. in the global war on terrorism and create chaos. Quitters never win.

Here's the problem: America needs two strong, sound political parties. As far as domestic policy is concerned, it really doesn't make much difference if Democrats or Republicans are in power. Ours is a free, entrepreneurial society where anyone can do anything he or she wants if they have a positive attitude and the desire to work, learn and achieve. Ambitious people come from all over the world to take advantage of this tremendous opportunity. This is one reason our economy is so resilient, continually bouncing back from periodic setbacks, driven by new inventions and achievements.

However, (97) when it comes to which party has proved more capable in acting to defend and protect Americans from foreign enemies, there is only one choice. From Johnson to Carter to Clinton, virtually all the defense policies and decisions made by Democratic administrations have been unsuccessful. And in many cases, they have unintentionally but materially increased the danger to our national security and the safety of all Americans.

ALSO SEE:  DEMOCRATS ARE VERRY WEAK ON DEFENSE HERE:   http://freedomkeys.com/demsondefense-excerpts.htm

    -- and Please PASS IT ALONG------------>


 

         
 

<----------------------------
COPY  AND  EMAIL 
TO  EVERYONE 
YOU CAN 

<----------------------------
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

<----------------------------
COPY  AND  EMAIL 
TO  EVERYONE 
YOU CAN

<----------------------------
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

<----------------------------
COPY  AND  EMAIL 
TO  EVERYONE 
YOU CAN

<----------------------------
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

<----------------------------
COPY  AND  EMAIL 
TO  EVERYONE 
YOU CAN

<----------------------------
 
 
 
 

 


11 posted on 11/04/2006 12:26:20 PM PST by FreeKeys (Ask yourself: "What else can I possibly do to ensure victory on Tuesday?" -- and THEN DO IT !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Nicely written, fact-filled article. Thanks for posting it.


12 posted on 11/04/2006 12:27:12 PM PST by syriacus (Got a moment? The election prayer thread's at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1731268/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
BTTT


"The only way America will ever be defeated by death-worshipping theocrats who've crawled out from under a Dark Ages rock is with the help of the mullahs' fifth column - academia, the media, the judiciary, public education, Hollywood and the Democratic Party.

Of the two suicide cults America confronts, liberalism is by far the more lethal."

-- Don Feder, In The War On Terror, Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims -- A 9/11 meditation, September 19, 2006


13 posted on 11/04/2006 12:29:39 PM PST by EdReform (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed -- * NRA * -- * JPFO *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
The beginning of our current problems - Jimmy Carter, elected during the Cold War with the Soviet Union, and (1) believing Americans had an inordinate fear of communism, (2) lifted U.S. citizens' travel bans to Cuba, North Korea, Vietnam and Cambodia and (3) pardoned draft evaders.

President Carter (4) also stopped B-1 bomber production, (5) gave away our strategically located Panama Canal and (6) made human rights the central focus of his foreign policy.

That led Carter, a Democrat, (7) to make a monumental miscalculation and withdraw U.S. support for our long-standing Mideast military ally, the Shah of Iran. (8) Carter simply didn't like the Shah's alleged mistreatment of imprisoned Soviet spies....and so on. Now look at this:

By now you've all seen the Democrats' latest campaign slogan:

"A New Direction For America -- Vote DEMOCRATIC!"*(NOT)

Let's analyze this empty and misleading promise.

The stock market is at a new all-time high and America's 401K's are back. A new direction from there means what??

Unemployment is at 25 year lows. A new direction from there means what??

Oil prices are plummeting. A new direction from there means what??

Taxes are at 20 year lows. A new direction from there means what??

Federal tax revenues are at all-time highs. A new direction from there means what??

The growth in the Federal deficit is down almost 50%, just as predicted over last year. A new direction from there means what??

Home valuations are up 200% over the past 3.5 years. A new direction from there means what??

Inflation is in check, hovering at 20 year lows. A new direction from there means what??

Not a single terrorist attack on US soil since 9/11/01. A new direction from there means what??

Osama bin Laden is living under a rock in a dark cave, having not surfaced in years, if he's alive at all, while 95% of Al Queda's top dogs are either dead or in custody, cooperating with US Intel. A new direction from there means what??

Several major terrorist attacks already thwarted by US and British Intel, including the recent planned attack involving 10 Jumbo Jets being exploded in mid-air over major US cities in order to celebrate the anniversary of the 9/11/01 attacks A new direction from there means what??

Just as Bush had planned and foretold us of on a number of occasions, Iraq was to be made "ground zero" for the war on terrorism -- and just as Bush said they would, terrorist cells from all over the region are alighting the shadows of their hiding places and flooding into Iraq in order to get their faces blown off by US Marines rather than boarding planes and heading to the United States to wage war on us here. A new direction from there means what??

Moreover, bear in mind that all of the above occurred in the face of the 1999 tech crash, the epidemic of corporate scandals throughout the 90's, and the 9/11/01 terrorist attacks on NYC years in the planning which collectively sucked 24 trillions dollars and 7.8 million jobs out of the US economy even before G. W. Bush had time to unpack his suitcases in the White House.

It's easy for the Democrats to attempt to discredit, disgrace and defame our commander in chief, George W. Bush -- that's what they do. What's not so easy for them to do is to refute irrefutable facts, no matter how they might try.

14 posted on 11/04/2006 12:33:12 PM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Only 97?


15 posted on 11/04/2006 12:33:43 PM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

Reason #98: Almost without exception, national Demagogue leaders are sniveling weasel wankers who would rather surrender first and then beg for mercy. The very few notable exceptions, such as Joe Lieberman or Zell Miller, are driven out of the party and/or treated as lepers.


16 posted on 11/04/2006 12:43:51 PM PST by Enchante ("WE SUPPORT THOSE WHO ARE NOT AS SMART AS JON VICHY CARY!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

The democrats are so weak on defense and the security of our nation that it is amazing that they are even considered a major political party. If they were not propped up by the major media they probably would have vanished years ago.


17 posted on 11/04/2006 12:44:11 PM PST by Keflavik76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

bttt


18 posted on 11/04/2006 12:48:27 PM PST by Matchett-PI (To have no voice in the Party that always sides with America's enemies is a badge of honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

Scoop Jackson, yes. But even the sainted Truman and JFK had grievous flaws and blind spots when it came to our national security (though they tried to correct some of their worst mistakes). Truman was grossly naive and gullible about the Soviets in 1945-47, and only started to take the peril seriously when Stalin made it overwhelmingly clear that his appetite for subjugating other nations was voracious. Our military was gutted in the late '40s - while the Congress of the time bears a lot of responsibility as well, it is certain that Truman did little to hold the line for a stronger defense. Then Truman and pals totally failed to recognize the extent of the treats in East Asia - it can be easily argued that Truman/Acheson blunders and softness led directly to the Korean War.

As for JFK, he also had his good moments, but he was often more talk than intelligent action. He was directly responsible for the blunders that led both to the Bay of Pigs fiasco and also the unnecessary "Cuban Missile Crisis".... let it also be said that JFK did nothing to address Vietnam effectively, though it can certainly be debated whether there was anything that would work short of bombing North Vietnam into oblivion (which of course would have opened its own set of risks with the PRC and USSR).

Anyway, I'm not sure that even JFK or Truman stands as any paragon of strong, intelligent defence, though they are both soooo much better than what's followed.


19 posted on 11/04/2006 12:52:12 PM PST by Enchante ("WE SUPPORT THOSE WHO ARE NOT AS SMART AS JON VICHY CARY!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

ooops, that was supposed to read "tHreats in East Asia" in regard to the run-up to the Korean War..... I don't know of too many "treats" to be had then, unless we are talking about Asian cuisine coming to the USA.


20 posted on 11/04/2006 12:53:58 PM PST by Enchante ("WE SUPPORT THOSE WHO ARE NOT AS SMART AS JON VICHY CARY!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: yoe
"A New Direction For America -- Vote DEMOCRATIC!"

Shades of Bill Clinton's campaign slogan from 1992: "We need change"

He never defined what that change would be, just that we needed change for some obscure reason. An empty slogan which resulted in what we are now mired in today.

21 posted on 11/04/2006 1:00:45 PM PST by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All



Just saw this terrific ad< "Wiretap":


"This terrorist wiretap has been disconnected by the Dem Congress...."

Watch it here:


http://www.citizensunited.org/news/Read.aspx?ID=37


It's really great!


22 posted on 11/04/2006 1:01:40 PM PST by FairOpinion (Vote Republican. The life you save may be your own. This is not an exaggeration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Keflavik76
If they were not propped up by the major media they probably would have vanished years ago.

Is there a difference between the two ?

23 posted on 11/04/2006 1:03:29 PM PST by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: All
WIRETAP
24 posted on 11/04/2006 1:20:43 PM PST by FairOpinion (Vote Republican. The life you save may be your own. This is not an exaggeration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

BTTT


25 posted on 11/04/2006 1:24:07 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

98) They are 100% politically motivated.


26 posted on 11/04/2006 2:05:26 PM PST by EGPWS (Lord help me be the conservative liberals fear I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keflavik76
If they were not propped up by the major media they probably would have vanished years ago.

They have three powerful allies: Big unions, education system, and the lamestream media. Without those three they would be just like Err Amerika...bankrupt, with no one listening to them.
27 posted on 11/04/2006 2:07:10 PM PST by JayNorth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

If the Dems were to take either house, it would be a nightmarish scenario.

They just. don't. get it.

It's just politics to them. Another tool they can use to try to regain the power they believe is rightfully theirs.

They don't understand the stakes and their ignorance could get us all killed.


28 posted on 11/04/2006 3:20:03 PM PST by PowerPro (OBSESSION: THE NEW DOCUMENTARY ABOUT RADICAL ISLAM VS. THE WEST ... http://www.obsessionthemovie.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

CHANGE. The clarion call of the left. It sounds good until you really think about it, though doesn't it? To hope that "change" can make things better?

The problem of course is that "change" is a misleading promise.

Why?

Because "change" in and of itself has no value judgment...it is neither good nor bad.

So yes...we can guarantee that the Democrats are right on one thing...there would be change if they won. The problem of course is that while they're lauding "change" as the reason to vote for them, I contest that the kind of "change" they'd bring about would create chaos and only make things worse.

They don't understand the stakes nor have a grasp on the true threat that faces us.

Without that kind of clarity, any "change" they wrought would be catastrophic.


29 posted on 11/04/2006 3:30:00 PM PST by PowerPro (OBSESSION: THE NEW DOCUMENTARY ABOUT RADICAL ISLAM VS. THE WEST ... http://www.obsessionthemovie.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Alex1977

Not A Kennedy. John F. Kennedy. And it is a moot point he is, after all, dead.


30 posted on 11/04/2006 3:32:13 PM PST by Mikey_1962 (If you build it, they won't come...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion; SJackson; yonif; Simcha7; American in Israel; Slings and Arrows; judicial meanz; ...

AMERICA AT WAR
At Salem the Soldier's Homepage ~
Honored member of FReeper Leapfrog's "Enemy of Islam" list.
Islam, a Religion of Peace®? Some links...  by backhoe
Translated Pre-War IRAQ Documents  by jveritas
Mohammed, The Mad Poet Quoted....  by PsyOp
"PLAES DO NOT TOCH THE WAR"  by AnnaZ
One FReeper On The Line  by SNOWFLAKE
The Clash of Ideologies - A Review

"...It's time we recognized the nature of the conflict. It's total war and we are all involved. Nobody on our side is exempted because of age, gender, or handicap. The Islamofacists have stolen childhood from the world." [FReeper Retief]

"...That the totalitarian force pitted against freedom wears a religious makes this civil war among mankind all the more difficult to engage. Loving freedom as we do, it seems reprehensible to deliberate against a religion. But this is no ordinary religion as it demands absolute obedience of all to their religion at the cost of freedom itself." [FReeper Backtothestreets]

American Flag

31 posted on 11/04/2006 6:03:31 PM PST by Salem (FREE REPUBLIC - Fighting to win within the Arena of the War of Ideas! So get in the fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salem
And if you need another reason to vote...


32 posted on 11/04/2006 6:06:26 PM PST by Mr.Atos (http://mysandmen.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Atos
Thanks, Mr.Atos !! Nice to see you you!  !
33 posted on 11/04/2006 6:28:26 PM PST by Salem (FREE REPUBLIC - Fighting to win within the Arena of the War of Ideas! So get in the fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Salem

I lurk. Your pings are not wasted, my Friend.


34 posted on 11/04/2006 6:32:02 PM PST by Mr.Atos (http://mysandmen.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion; Mo1

Excellent video ~ thank you.

Also, excellent post by Mo1
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1732216/posts


35 posted on 11/04/2006 7:04:04 PM PST by b9 ("the [evil Marxist liberal socialist Democrat Party] alternative is unthinkable" ~ Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

That is a great ad!


36 posted on 11/04/2006 7:22:31 PM PST by Mo1 (Senator Kerry's response to the military ~ Let me make this is crystal clear, I apologize to no one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

What the US Army recruiting poster under "President" Kerry would look like:

Our brave warriors n Irak respond to Jon Carry"


Kerry is no different re his hatred of a strong America and our warriors than 99.9% of the rats in congress. Every rat running for election should have to face a copy of this banner everytime they show their treasonous faces. Pelosi, Murtha, Clintoon, Boxer, Kennedy, Durbin, Levin, Rangle, Reid and other rats in congress hate our military and a strong America. Just look at their voting records the past two years as President Bush pointed out this week.

Kerry is shown leading his fellow hate America and our military Rats to their final destination in American Politics:

(John Kerry picked the wrong people to insult.)

I can't help but feel the real shame is on us, the American voters. We continue to let our troops, our heritage and our nation down by sending the dreggs of our society to represent us at the highest levels and portray our image and soul around the globe.

My GOD- how low have we slipped when we elect murderers, admitted war criminals and traitors to the highest body in our government?

SHAME ON US!

24 posted on 11/03/2006 8:33:33 AM PST by Baynative (There is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress - Mark Twain)

Kerry in one of his many acts of treason after his very short Nam tour.

Vote against all traitors this election day. Support our troops and their CIC, President Bush.


37 posted on 11/04/2006 9:43:21 PM PST by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
And one more, a great cartoon by Michael Ramirez, cartoonist at the Investors Business Daily


38 posted on 11/04/2006 9:46:26 PM PST by FairOpinion (Vote Republican. The life you save may be your own. This is not an exaggeration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

bttt


39 posted on 11/05/2006 12:49:59 PM PST by petercooper (Polls Schmolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salem

I'd vote for the miniature Pommeranian that lives in the house up the street from me before I'd vote DimRAT!


40 posted on 11/06/2006 5:09:06 AM PST by Convert from ECUSA (Regarding islam: Osculate meas Sanctas Romanas Ecclesiae nates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS; Free ThinkerNY
98) They are 100% politically motivated.

You got that right!

41 posted on 05/03/2011 10:26:33 AM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]



I’m Floored
That You Haven’t Donated Yet!


Sponsoring FReepers leapfrog0202 and another person will contribute $10
Each time a new monthly donor signs up!
Get more bang for your buck
Sign up today

Lazamataz! We miss you.

42 posted on 05/03/2011 10:40:12 AM PDT by TheOldLady (Almost as evil as the Freeper Criminal Mastermind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson