Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MadIvan
Blair: "Or, alternatively, they face the consequence of not doing so: isolation."

For what it's worth, this is one of them "dern foreign" newspapers reporting on the "not softening" of the policy to remove the deterrant of military action from the diplomatic equation.

For the past two years, the White House has stated clearly that "all options" are on the table with regard to Iran. If this doesn't undercut the White House, I don't know what does. Iran "living up to their obligations" means letting the U.N. back in to do their inspections. Whoop dee doo. That carries all the weight of a feather in a hurricane.

15 posted on 11/14/2006 7:01:29 AM PST by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Rutles4Ever
The Times has been going off on a trip to la la land recently. This is not the first time it's spun events in this manner.

I would hasten to point out that Blair didn't say that military options were off the table. He said isolation was the first consequence.

Regards, Ivan

16 posted on 11/14/2006 7:04:25 AM PST by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson