Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Bush nominates Jim Rogan to Federal District Court
Flashreprot ^ | 11-15-2006 3:41 pm | Jon Fleischman

Posted on 11/15/2006 4:19:48 PM PST by ElkGroveDan

This afternoon President George W. Bush announced that he has nominated Orange County Superior Court Judge James E. Rogan to a seat on the United States District Court for the Central Valley.

Rogan, of course, is a superstar on the Republican side of the aisle. While originally a Democrat, Rogan found his heart and soul in the Grand ol' Party of Abraham Lincoln. He has had a storied career -- as a successful gang murder prosecutor, a judge up in Los Angeles County, GOP Majority Leader (yes, we had one of those once!) of the California State Assembly, a Member of Congress (where he served as one of the handful of managers of impeachment trial of former President Bill Clinton), and went on to serve President George W. Bush as an Undersecretary of Commerce and as Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and was recently appointed by Governor Schwarzenegger to fill a vacancy on the Orange County Superior Court.

The FlashReport caught up with Judge Rogan to get his thoughts upon his nomination:

"I am humbled by the news of my nomination. As the US Senate undertakes the process of reviewing it, I hope my years as a gang murder prosecutor, legislator, judge and public servant commends me to them. I look forward to working with the Senate and to answering their questions in the coming weeks."

HOW WILL THIS PLAY OUT IN THE U.S. SENATE? Obviously the "home run" for Rogan would be to be voted out by the United States Senate in a lame-duck session in the next month or two. But you have to figure it is likely that the Democrats will start to filibuster if Republicans try to confirm judicial appointments in a lame-duck Congress.

This will mean that the President will technically have to re-nominate Rogan upon the opening of the next session of Congress, and that's where Rogan's bi-partisan support will be very helpful. Back in 2001, Rogan was unanimously supported by both the Senate Judiciary Committee and by the entire United States Senate. Yes, including every Democrat! Of course, this was to an Undersecretary role in the Department of Commerce, still... Also, Rogan is supported in his judicial bid by some pretty prominent Democrats including Clinton White House Counsel Lanny Davis, Clinton impeachment lawyers Lanny Breuer, David Kendall, and Emmett Flood; California Democrats Juanita McDonald, Jane Harmon, and Anna Eshoo, among others. Oh yes, believe it or not, even former California Senate President Pro-Tem John Burton is supporting his confirmation!

We'll see what happens with this -- but a hearty congratulations to Jim Rogan, and of course our appreciation to the President along with well-meaning, "What took you so long?"


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: bush; courts; doa; judges; ratswontaccept; rogan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: pollywog; Admin Moderator
THIS IS THE BEST THING THAT HAS HAPPENED ALL WEEK!!

I agree. I wasn't sure if I should make it BREAKING. Admin?

21 posted on 11/15/2006 4:32:51 PM PST by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
the United States District Court for the Central Valley

That should be for the Central District of California.

22 posted on 11/15/2006 4:33:21 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

I'll tell Jon.


23 posted on 11/15/2006 4:34:15 PM PST by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Omega Man II
I'm thinkin a secret "Hillary" hold.
24 posted on 11/15/2006 4:35:19 PM PST by stylin19a ("Klaatu Barada Nikto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

The dims have already said that Bush gets no more judges.


25 posted on 11/15/2006 4:38:10 PM PST by taillightchaser (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Outstanding nomination.


26 posted on 11/15/2006 4:43:59 PM PST by OldFriend (WEAKNESS IS A PROVOCATION, AN INVITATION TO OUR FOES TO CONFRONT US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Bush nominates ex-California Rep. Rogan for federal bench

Associated Press

WASHINGTON - President Bush on Wednesday nominated former California GOP congressman James E. Rogan for a federal judgeship. Rogan was defeated in his San Gabriel Valley district six years ago after attaining prominence as a House manager during President Clinton's impeachment trial.

Bush nominated Rogan for a seat on the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Rogan has been serving since earlier this year as a Superior Court judge in Orange County after he was appointed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

He served from 2001-2004 as director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Rogan left Congress after his 2000 loss to Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Pasadena, in an $11 million contest that was the most expensive House race in history.

Rogan's was one of a list of nominations the White House sent to the Senate in a bid to push through judicial nominations before Republicans lose control of the Senate. They included six appeals court nominees who Democrats say are too conservative for the federal bench, including William Gerry Myers III and Norman Randy Smith, both of Idaho, for the 9th Circuit in San Francisco.

Myers is a former top lawyer at the Interior Department and lobbyist for mining and cattle interests. Democrats have blocked his nomination since 2003, railing against what they call his anti-environment agenda and an acrimonious past with American Indians.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein has vowed to block the nomination of Smith because she wants that seat to go to a Californian.


27 posted on 11/15/2006 4:51:11 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

Why didn't he nominate and send him to committee 3 months ago?


28 posted on 11/15/2006 4:55:25 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

I think I remember this guy, wasn't he the guy with a cheesy toupee? Not that it's important, if I remember correctly he was a good guy I'm just trying to place him from memory.


29 posted on 11/15/2006 5:14:22 PM PST by marlon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

YEAH!!!! First good news in over a week!


30 posted on 11/15/2006 5:20:30 PM PST by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Mr. Rogan is most deserving.

Frankly, Bush is a weasel for making this nomination after the election. He knows damned well the Slave Party will never let Rogan sit on the bench after prosecuting Bubba.

31 posted on 11/15/2006 5:31:25 PM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are REALLY stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

Watch out for Hillary.....she holds grudges.


32 posted on 11/15/2006 5:38:51 PM PST by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

I agree!


33 posted on 11/15/2006 6:11:05 PM PST by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV
Good luck!

Though Rogan is a good man. I like him.

34 posted on 11/15/2006 6:20:20 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul

Keep the faith and in Blassie you shall trust,
He won't give up until the last geek bites the dust!


35 posted on 11/15/2006 6:26:57 PM PST by HitmanLV ("Get up, come on get down with the sickness.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

As one of the thirteen he is dooomed to Rat ostracism.

He is one of the truly great guys. They don't get the respect they deserve.


36 posted on 11/15/2006 6:29:31 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. Rozerem commercials give me nightmares)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan; red meat conservative; goldstategop; Cowgirl; fieldmarshaldj; zbigreddogz; Torie; ...

That was a gutsy move by the Bush Administration.

There is one hopeful excerpt in this article:

"Also, Rogan is supported in his judicial bid by some pretty prominent Democrats including Clinton White House Counsel Lanny Davis, Clinton impeachment lawyers Lanny Breuer, David Kendall, and Emmett Flood; California Democrats Juanita McDonald, Jane Harmon, and Anna Eshoo, among others. Oh yes, believe it or not, even former California Senate President Pro-Tem John Burton is supporting his confirmation!"

That is a hopeful sign.


37 posted on 11/15/2006 6:54:57 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (Corporatism is not conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

There is more bipartisan tolerance of federal district judges than appellate judges, and of course SCOTUS judges, because they don't set precedent.


38 posted on 11/15/2006 6:58:58 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Awesome!

I had the chance to chat with his brother at a mutual friend's 50th birthday party back in 1998 - nice guy who spoke very well of his brother. A cool semi-brush with integrity.


39 posted on 11/15/2006 7:00:48 PM PST by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again. And Always Act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Chuckie will make sure this goes no where. We'll be back to the land of obstruction on judges. Well, we'll find ourselves in an even more intractable state with the Rats in full control.


40 posted on 11/15/2006 7:49:20 PM PST by newzjunkey (I blame Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson