Skip to comments.Republicans Need a Great Communicator
Posted on 11/16/2006 12:45:52 PM PST by Milltownmalbay
For a change its the Republicans who have some soul-searching to do after the elections.
There is no doubt that the Republicans failed to control spending, failed to control illegal immigration, and failed to reform social security. Nevertheless, the biggest failure of the Republican Party has been communication with the American people.
Ronald Reagan was the Great Communicator. George Bush cant connect subject and predicate . Bill Frist looks like a doctor telling his patient that she has cancer and Denny Hastert just looks like he wants directions to the local pub.
In spite of the proverbial six year itch, Republicans should have been able to increase their margins in both the House and the Senate and set the stage for 2008.
The economy is stronger than ever and its clearly due to the Bush tax cuts. How many commercials did we see touting the economy during this election cycle?
Terrible blunders on the part of the Clinton Administration culminated in the worst attack on American soil in our history and Bush met the challenge head-on.
Bush successfully struck at the Taliban in Afghanistan and passed the Patriot Act, which repaired many of the flawed policies of previous administrations.
Republicans blamed individual Democrats for voting against the Patriot Act, but Republicans never explained the Patriot Act. Why didnt the Republicans run a national ad campaign on national security? Why didnt they explain the parts of the Patriot Act to the American people and show us specifically how the Patriot Act has kept us safe?
Ask a question in a poll about the Patriot Act and you may get a mixed result. Ask people if they favor giving captured terrorists the same rights as American citizens and the result would be quite different. The Republicans never made that case.
The United States has not been attacked since September 11. Was that just a coincidence, or did the new policies of the Bush Administration keep us safer? If they did, the Republicans never told us how.
By simply charging that the Democrats want to cut and run in Iraq, the Republicans allowed them to turn the election into a national referendum on Iraq at a time when the war is unpopular.
Now we get to spend at least two years in the Twilight Zone of Democratic leadership. If we do not find a standard bearer who can communicate for 2008, it might be even longer.
lol! Brilliant line!
The best options are Newt and Rush. If an actor can be President, why not a radio commentator?
I think Newt Gingrich is an amazing speaker, too bad about those ethics violations which are ammunition for opponents.
Rush wouldn't take the pay cut!..........
Of all the likely contenders, Rudy is the most effective communicator.
A great communicator would be nice, but I'd settle for an authentic conservative.
Actually, with Newt we could have both -- but, he's far too principled to make it through the primary seine.
Remind us again just what those were.
This is the factor that intrigues me about Romney, but I'm not sold on him otherwise.
Alan Keyes for President!
What ethics violations?
Alan Keyes is fantastic, but he'd never get elected. The Liberal Press would eat him alive.
If s/he can get over the wailing of the DSM, lower education brainwashers, socialist hacks pretending to be scientists/scholars, empty headed celebrities, and the traitor Demoncr@ps, then the next elections will be pure pwnage.
It is futile to only look at a messenger when the entire traditional news establishment is a tool of one of the political parties.
It is the giant elephant in the living room that nobody is noticing.
It's very Frustrating out of 300 million Americans we don't have a collection of Conservative minded candidates who are great leaders.
If we do, I never hear about them.
Saa-a-a-ay, now that's a winning ticket....probably would sweep the entire country no matter whom the Dims put up to run against them!
I'd settle for a passable communicator.
Rush wouldn't do it in a million years and both he and Newt would get shredded about their personal lives. But I really think that Sean Hannity or Tony Snow could do it.
If it's a republican it doesnt matter. If there are none, the media will invent them. :)
Not only THAT.....but Mitt's also a good lookin' and charismatic fellow.
Rush would cause liberal heads to explode. However his chances may be as good as Ollie's were. He got my vote and so would Rush.
Kicking Ass & Taking Names.
Yes, Mitt is also very impressive but I'd give Rudy the yellow jersey on this.
I couldn't agree more with this article, I have been saying the same thing for years. Bush simply has zero charisma, making him an easy target that the MSM has had a hay day with.
Personally, I think we should draft Fred Thompson, who comes across as someone who is authoritative and speaks very well.
Pro-death candidate. I kind of like kids.
Maybe Tony Snow could just run for President then...not now, but he has some cache to run for Senate or something.
All true what you say, but it is what it is. And we can still beat them. Reagan did it, speaking over their heads directly to Americans. And there was no alternative media. Bush had his victories and can not communicate like Reagan.
Until a few months ago I thought this person might be George Allen. Then I got to see him debate the heckler. Scratch George off the list.
Here is some of the ammo I mentioned that would be used against him all over again pulled from Wikipedia:
"Gingrich was accused of hypocrisy and unethical behavior when he accepted a $4.5 million advance as part of a book deal, in light of his previous role in the investigation of Jim Wright. Following the accusations, Gingrich returned the advance."
"Including charges related to the book deal, Democrats filed 84 ethics charges against Speaker Gingrich during his term, including claiming tax-exempt status for a college course run for political purposes and using the GOPAC political action committee as a slush fund. All charges were eventually dropped following an investigation by the Republican-led House Ethics Committee. However, Gingrich admitted to "unintentionally" giving inaccurate information to the House Ethics Committee during the course of the investigation. The committee did not indict him on charges of intentional perjury. The matter was settled when he agreed to reimburse the Committee $300,000 for the cost of prolonging the investigation. The payment was described as a "cost assessment" and not a fine by the Committee. He also agreed to not "spin" the story in the media, but admit publicly to his transgressions."
Lynne also kicks MSM as. Got my vote on that ticket.
Conversely, Clinton was a good communicator, but his only core value was his own power, and eventually people caught on that he was just spewing nonsense and the Dems declined as a result.
Likewise, the GOP wasted their power as a complete majority over their pursuit of the other white meat. It's hard for people to take you seriously when you say you are for limited government but massively increase spending and raise earmarks to an art form.
And it's even harder to be taken seriously when you re-select Trent Lott for a leadership position after getting spanked into the minority.
Newt is about as smart as any of them until he's in front of a rolling camera. The idiot light comes on and he starts acting like a fool.
Closely connected with need for a communicator is the failure, in recent times, to understand what leadership even IS in the politcal realm. Instead of trying to 'appeal' to moderates / centrists / independents, we ought to be converting them. State conservative principles over and over again in strong, simple terms. Make people see that they are RIGHT, not that they are merely closer to whatever they already want or think.
IMHO, he's the most prinipled man in politics today, probably one of the most in the last 60-70 years. And that is exactly why the media would eat him alive, and all the Dems would scream. Because thats all they could do, because they couldn't match Keyes in a debate on issues.
Lastly, he wouldn't get elected because there would still be some whites who wouldn't vote for a black man. I doubt if very many women would find him very "charming" or "good looking" like Bill Clinton. Too many blacks call him an Uncle Tom, or that he's too whiteyized. His principles go against the lack of principles of the gay community and their enablers.
Basically, the only ones that would vote for him are the ones that believe character, integrity, and virtue are the most important asspects for a POTUS.
Hannity isn't nearly smart enough.
The Republicans need a great communticator, but they also need a message to communicate. They need some guiding principles.
Sending anyone to the senate screws them up. Besides, I'm looking for support for my Snow/Pace '08 ticket.
Possibly not, Tony Snow is though.
It would be better for the country if Rush kept up with his radio show as President.
The Dems would demand = time.........
They've got it -- it's called Air America.
And wouldn't I love to see a Presidential debate between Rush Limbaugh and Al Franken!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.