Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Rangel will seek to reinstate draft
AP via Yahoo! ^ | November 19, 2006 | AP

Posted on 11/19/2006 10:30:36 AM PST by Brilliant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 461 next last
To: Brilliant

Why don't these stories ever mention the fact that when this nutjob introduced this before, he voted AGAINST it when it came to a vote? Yeesh!

And he's all over the board on all of this stuff. He voted FOR the use of force in Iraq...before he voted against it! Double Yeesh!

http://www.vote-smart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=H2690103



61 posted on 11/19/2006 11:00:44 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender
A draft doesn't have to be limited to military personnel. Draftees good be put into police departments, federal or state forest services, the Border Patrol, Homeland Security, TSA, etc.
62 posted on 11/19/2006 11:01:49 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee (Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: Brilliant

The reason the draft is a winner is that you can pay draftees $78 per month. That makes the war a lot cheaper to fight.


64 posted on 11/19/2006 11:02:42 AM PST by ArtyFO (I love to smoke cigars when I adjust artillery fire at the moonbat loonery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr

Rangle is a likeable person. He is also smart and served our country well. However, his pandering and politics are very distasteful to me.


65 posted on 11/19/2006 11:02:51 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
A draft doesn't have to be limited to military personnel. Draftees good be put into police departments, federal or state forest services, the Border Patrol, Homeland Security, TSA, etc.

Of course. Government can force people to do a lot of things, and a lot of jobs, if government assumes dictatorial control over people's lives. They did it in the Soviet Union for 70 years - telling people what jobs they had to take for the "good of the fatherland."

66 posted on 11/19/2006 11:03:13 AM PST by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

Well when it comes to Armies, you need Big Numbers and if there is an associated headache.....well, take some asprin.


67 posted on 11/19/2006 11:04:23 AM PST by scannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
He said having a draft would not necessarily mean everyone called to duty would have to serve. Instead, "young people (would) commit themselves to a couple of years in service to this great republic, whether it's our seaports, our airports, in schools, in hospitals," with a promise of educational benefits at the end of service.

Bottom line, a sneaky and very creative new form of welfare.
This guy is a Socialist's socialist!

The only group more useless than a regular government bureaucracy, is a do-nothing welfare program masquerading as a "service" bureaucracy.

Incompetence legitemized forever...

68 posted on 11/19/2006 11:04:45 AM PST by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
A draft is biblical.

Where does Jesus advocate a draft? Please give me chapter and verse. Jesus is my Lord and Savior. If you're talking Biblical, He's the Authority I look to.

69 posted on 11/19/2006 11:04:48 AM PST by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ArtyFO

No you can't. Draftees come under the same pay scales as enlistees.


70 posted on 11/19/2006 11:04:50 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr

"Isn't it just like Rengel's generation of socialist democrats to protest the most when they were of draft age, but as soon as they have power, insist younger generations give more than they did?"

Great point, except Rangel served in Korea.


71 posted on 11/19/2006 11:05:09 AM PST by libertylover76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

"A draft doesn't have to be limited to military personnel."

I disagree. If the government is going to coerce people to put their lives on the line, all draftees should have to take the same risk. I am not in favor of a draft, but if there is one, there should be no exceptions. Let's have no more Vietnam crap, where good young kids get killed and we get stuck 30 years later with Bill Clinton.


72 posted on 11/19/2006 11:05:35 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

You got it. By making military service wildly unpopular, by painting it as a tool of the wealthy to further persecute the poor, and by assuring that the quality of the military will plummet, rangel hopes to destroy our military.


73 posted on 11/19/2006 11:07:26 AM PST by SuzyQue (Remember to think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

Sorry, my speel cheker screwed up.


A draft is certainly UNbiblical. According to OT law, those who had no stomach for fighting were excused from war.


74 posted on 11/19/2006 11:07:34 AM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Good I hope the Dems run on that. It should assure an election loss in 2008.
75 posted on 11/19/2006 11:08:42 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
I dont believe we should have done away with the draft to begin with. I think they should call Charlie Rangel's bluff and reinstate it...

A draft called for by democrats and passed in a Democrat majority should sink their ship in 2008 . Especially when the NOW cows find that women will be subject to the new draft.

: )

76 posted on 11/19/2006 11:09:12 AM PST by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

I think the Muslim world looks at us as paper tigers who will run at the first hint of resistance. I think that the reinstatement of the draft says that we're in it for the long haul and will pay the price to win. We need a bigger footprint in the region. Dismantel the boutique brigades and raise an Army Strong not an Army of one.


77 posted on 11/19/2006 11:09:32 AM PST by ArtyFO (I love to smoke cigars when I adjust artillery fire at the moonbat loonery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
First the discussion has to be aimed at a more general level - how much of the federal budget should be dedicated to the military. I read somewhere in a thread earlier today that that currently is just under 5%. I can't verify that or quote a source, but until somebody finds a better number, I'm going to use it.

Given that a common defense is one the few things the Constitution specifically authorizes the federal government to do, is 5% enough?

The only reason this is important is that, in order to actually start the draft again, and go back to a 2-year cycle-in, cycle-out routine, the number of training facilities would have to be expanded dramatically, along with all the other overhead that would come from a larger force of people who most likely do not consider this to be a career opportunity.

After all that, then you can have the discussion about how to fairly administer draft obligations, and that would be a long, interesting debate. I still have my field jacket, with no insignia. I've told my children that it was my door prize from Mr. Nixon's lottery, and then I found out how much American history they learned in school.

78 posted on 11/19/2006 11:10:38 AM PST by Bernard (Going without a tagline to see how it feels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
It's always a good time to quote Milton Friedman:
General William Westmoreland, testifying before President Nixon's Commission on an All-Volunteer [Military] Force, denounced the idea, saying that he did not want to command an army of mercenaries.
Milton Friedman interrupted him: "General, would you rather command an army of slaves?"

79 posted on 11/19/2006 11:10:44 AM PST by Wormwood (We broke it. We bought it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender
How do you spend your time? Are you employed, or retired?

Hit a nerve did he?
You wouldn't be what is euphemistically called a "gamer"?

80 posted on 11/19/2006 11:10:47 AM PST by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 461 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson