Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study says boomers don't like what's on TV
Associated Press ^ | 11-19-06 | DAVID BAUDER

Posted on 11/19/2006 8:53:37 PM PST by Snickering Hound

NEW YORK — Americans born between 1946 and 1964 are accustomed to being catered to, but that's not the case with much of television today. Now there's some new evidence that they're finding this mighty irritating.

A study conducted by Harris Interactive suggests that the television industry's obsession with youth is backfiring.

Nearly two-thirds of Americans say they believe that most TV programming and advertising is targeted toward people under 40, the survey said. More than 80 percent of adults over 40 say they have a hard time finding TV shows that reflect their lives.

A significant number of baby boomers — 37 percent — say they aren't happy with what's on television, according to the study.

"The amount of people dissatisfied with television overall was a pretty big eye-opening thing for us," said Larry Jones, president of the TV Land cable network, which commissioned the study.

To a certain extent, the generation that decades ago warned against trusting people over 30 can blame itself for the predicament. The TV industry's slavish devotion to ratings within the 18-to-49-year-old demographic started when most baby boomers fit into that group.

The theory among advertisers is that it's important to reach young people as their preferences are forming — get them hooked on a certain toothpaste or soda early and they'll be hooked for life. Advertisers will pay a premium for young viewers: $335 for every thousand people in the 18-to-24 age range that a network delivers, for example. Viewers aged 55-to-64 are worth only $119 for every thousand, according to Nielsen Media Research.

That's why ABC and NBC conduct all of their business with advertisers in the 18-to-49 demo. From a financial standpoint, if you're 50 or over, you mean nothing to those networks' executives. For Fox, the CW, MTV, BET and countless other networks, even 40 is too old.

The peak year for births within the baby boom, Jones noted, was 1957 — meaning all those people are turning 49 this year.

Much of the television industry isn't aging with them.

"They've just never changed or haven't realized that the population has moved on," said Randy Berkowitz, vice president of research for Combe Inc., which makes health products and beauty aids.

Berkowitz believes that "people are just not in tune with TV because they can't relate to it anymore."

Jones, who's 46, said he wants to come home at night and see an entertainment program that appeals to his sensibilities. Some people may find Paris Hilton funny on "The Simple Life," for example — not him.

To a surprising extent, advertising is also alienating. The Harris Interactive study found that half of baby boomers say they tune out commercials that are clearly aimed at young people. An additional one-third said they'd go out of their way NOT to buy such a product.

"I'm not saying that every show, every network should reshape, but that's an awfully high level of dissatisfaction among the largest generation group of all time," said Ken Dychtwald, a psychologist who worked with Harris Interactive on the study. (Harris conducted an online survey of 4,220 adults between April 28-May 15 this year, with a sampling error of plus or minus 1.5 percent).

Some advertisers have responded to the aging population. Financial services firms, for example, see many potential customers advancing toward retirement. Two decades ago drug companies didn't advertise on TV; now you could fill a medicine cabinet with all the products hawked on the evening news.

But these were cases where the companies making these products saw the opportunity, not necessarily the TV industry, Berkowitz said.

TV Land's Jones is already using the survey in his business. The results have convinced him that, more than ever, his network of mostly classic TV shows should be boomer-centric, he said. He also comes armed with the survey when he meets with the Madison Avenue types who buy advertising time.

One statistic he's sure to cite: The survey found 51 percent of the postwar generation describe themselves as "open to new ideas." Meanwhile, only 12 percent of young adults think the older folks feel that way.

Why does that matter? Jones said the average media buyer or planner is under 30. Many are undoubtedly hired for their know-how in appealing to a specific generation, and it isn't the baby boomers.

"There is this huge perception versus reality situation in the marketplace," he said.

Jones is pushing the idea of a "middlescence," about 40-to-59-year-olds who don't feel young anymore but don't feel old, and have plenty of discretionary income.

With the continued carving of the television audience into smaller slices because of all the networks on the air, the chance for advertisers to reach particular niches increases, said Evan Shapiro, who had his own marketing firm and is now head of the Independent Film Channel. Shapiro, 37, doesn't buy the idea that there's nothing on TV for older viewers.

"If you are a 50-year-old male or female, there is an enormous amount of television for you," he said. "It's just not on all the places that it used to be."

Still, Shapiro said he senses that marketers are slowly waking up to the potential in older TV viewers.

But by the time it happens, the children of the baby boomers will be the focus, making their parents even more irrelevant in television's eyes, he said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: genx; theresnothingon; tv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-242 next last
To: Snickering Hound
Two decades ago drug companies didn't advertise on TV; now you could fill a medicine cabinet with all the products hawked on the evening news.

I may be wrong (because I am aging!!), but I think that 20 years ago, drug companies were not allowed to advertise on TV. Now they are. That could be the reason why there are more drug commercials today than there were 20 years ago.

Speaking of aging, I was born in 1962, but have never considered myself to be a baby-boomer (even though anyone born up through 1964 is supposedly a Boomer). A few years back, I read an article comparing the differences between Baby Boomers, and Gen X'ers. I had a lot more in common with Gen X. They said that the Boomers, for example, grew up listening to Elvis, The Beatles, and The Rolling Stones. I can name a handful of Elvis songs because EVERYONE knows them - they are everywhere, and you can't get away from them. I think I can name 2 or 3 Stones songs, but that is about it. I learned Beatles songs only when I got into high school, and had my interest sparked because we played a Beatles montage in band.

By the time I started noticing pop music, about age 9-11, all of those listed above were either over, or not being played extensively in roller skating rinks, or "Top 40" radio stations, the only music that I heard. The first music I remember being "in" to was by the Partridge Family, and top 40 songs such as "Kung Fu Fighting" and "The Night Chicago Died" (I cringe making that admission!!).

Either way, I think that the boundaries of what constitutes a "Baby Boomer" are not very accurate.
61 posted on 11/19/2006 9:42:24 PM PST by Zetman (I believe the children are the next generation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound
"Jones is pushing the idea of a "middlescence," about 40-to-59-year-olds who don't feel young anymore but don't feel old, and have plenty of discretionary income."

The television executives need to do something different if they expect to pry some of that bountiful discretionary income out of my hands and into the coffers of their advertisers. However, the heirs to my estate hope they continue to ignore me and drive me away to alternative, non-commercial forms of entertainment. :-)

62 posted on 11/19/2006 9:43:31 PM PST by Unmarked Package
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

Sitcoms are horrible. There used to be some good ones, but now it's stupid people saying stupid things that nobody would ever say and doing things that no one would ever do. The example I always point to is the one episode of NewsRadio I watched. The characters go to lunch at a Chuck E. Cheese-style restaurant, and one of them says, "Where is our waiter? I haven't seen him in a while." Suddenly, the guy rises up from under the balls in the ball pool, smoking. "Oh, I was on break." Okay. I'm not an All in the Family fan, but you would never have seen that BS there.


63 posted on 11/19/2006 9:43:39 PM PST by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: acapesket

Jack has been on that boat to China for a long time.


64 posted on 11/19/2006 9:43:54 PM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

I did a survey on one about a month ago. The name of the half hour sitcom was, "Dads" & just going on the name, what would you expect to see in the show?


65 posted on 11/19/2006 9:44:41 PM PST by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

I've never seen it put that eloquently!

CA....


66 posted on 11/19/2006 9:45:08 PM PST by Chances Are (Whew! It seems I've once again found that silly grin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

It's about people from different parts of the world who have developed super powers and are slowly coming together to stop a nuclear holocaust. One of the heroes--the flying guy--is Natalie Maines's husband. But, don't let that stop you. :)

Warning: it's very violent and gory.


67 posted on 11/19/2006 9:45:19 PM PST by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

Yeah the shows have young people but we get equal time during comercials. Ensure, gotta go medicine, funeral and life insurance planning, skin care, eye surgeries, sexual dysfuntion medication, assisted living homes .... Commercial used to be entertaining. Now they are just depressing.


68 posted on 11/19/2006 9:45:35 PM PST by CindyDawg (Lord, please open eyes and touch hearts and provide us with Christian Leaders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: william clark

I wouldn't mind trying House or 24, but I'd have to get the DVDs first. I hate to come in in the middle.


69 posted on 11/19/2006 9:46:14 PM PST by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound
Except for "South Park," I don't watch any current shows on TV.
I'm awaiting season three of "Miami Vice" on DVD.
70 posted on 11/19/2006 9:46:43 PM PST by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: william clark
Lost, Ghost Whisperer, Eureka, South Park, a few other, but not many. I used to watch ER, Medium, and a couple of sitcoms, but they kept throwing the homosexual sobstory line in them, so I quit watching.
71 posted on 11/19/2006 9:47:21 PM PST by gidget7 (Political Correctness is Marxism with a nose job)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
"In '88 I had a TV for a few months, could not stand the crap and gave it away, and my wellbeing has improved mightily."

Hey dad! Good to see you! :)

jk jk

72 posted on 11/19/2006 9:48:00 PM PST by Killborn (Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

We boomers are the ones with the money. It's our cohort that's buying the Lexuses. No point in advertising cars, cruises, and other expensive goodies to people who are too young to have the disposable income to buy them.


73 posted on 11/19/2006 9:48:14 PM PST by Fairview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

I've enjoyed Lost this season, though I know it's gotten a mixed reaction. Veronica Mars started out as VM Lite, but there have been some great episodes. The most recent one was really good. Don't know if you know, but it's finally been picked up for the rest of the season. They wanted an additional nine episodes, but only got seven more. I don't mind being two shy, but I hope it isn't a sign that a fourth season is off the table.


74 posted on 11/19/2006 9:48:45 PM PST by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound
The quality of television programming has decreased enormously in the last decade. Most of the writers are in their 20s and the substance of the scripts that make it to air are nil. To think of the many pilots that were rejected always made me wonder just what TPTB were thinking when they picked their new lineups. The adult dramas with a cast of various ages are so fluffy or liberal (think Studio 60) that I refuse to watch. The sitcoms are ridiculous as well. Years ago, CBS was known as the old folks network: "Murder She Wrote," "Diagnoses Murder," "Touched By An Angel" and "Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman" - they all pulled in great ratings but were cancelled so the network could appeal to the younger kids. The best sitcoms ever, "The Dick Van Dyke Show," "Newhart" and even "Cheers" had an older cast and were fabulous. And the ironic thing is that 50 plus adults have much more money than the younger folks do.
75 posted on 11/19/2006 9:48:49 PM PST by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

Wow sage, your age is showing! ;)


76 posted on 11/19/2006 9:49:30 PM PST by gidget7 (Political Correctness is Marxism with a nose job)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly

I really couldn't guess. Not anymore.


77 posted on 11/19/2006 9:49:51 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan

My favorite movie of all time is "The Long Hot Summer" with Don Johnson and Jason Robards.


78 posted on 11/19/2006 9:51:33 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Rastus

I would sincerely doubt it gets to a 4th season, regardless. The ratings have never been stellar, and only a small-but-loyal fanbase has kept it afloat for a third season. Plus, it doesn't seem to have the same spark that it did when Veronica was at Neptune High. Same with Smallville...this is a relatively weak season, if you ask me. They never should have killed off Jonathan Kent.


79 posted on 11/19/2006 9:51:40 PM PST by TheBigB (Do you think "Lady in the Water" is in Ted Kennedy's NetFlix queue?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Spirochete
"Sponsors like the visciously racist Orbitz."

Really? I can't recall even seeing any Orbitz commercials, although I've used them for flights. How are they racist?

80 posted on 11/19/2006 9:54:06 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-242 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson