Jennings' campaign has been complaining about the voting machine and the large amount of under-votes.
Does it sound like she has a case here? Or is she just complaining because she's not willing to concede defeat yet?
This is my personal opinion. The primary between Vern Buchanan and Tramm Hudson was ugly and bruising. Vern won. I suspect there were a number of Republicans who weren't enthusiastic about voting for Vern but no way in hell were they going to vote for Christine Jennings. They voted for no one and now Jennings is trying to claim those non-votes for herself.
The under-vote in the 2000 election, for the same congressional race, was 2% higher than the under-vote in 2006 that Jennings is whining about.
Hundreds of Dem dirtbags have now come out of the woodwork to claim that they punched the box next to Jennings name but a vote for Buchanan was recorded. They also lamely claim that when they brought this to the attention of election officials they were ignored because the republican controlled county was in the tank for Vern. Typical Dem posturing. If you can't win legitimately, claim fraud and conspiracy and demand a re-vote. This city is becoming too liberal.