Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Serious question.

Jennings' campaign has been complaining about the voting machine and the large amount of under-votes.

Does it sound like she has a case here? Or is she just complaining because she's not willing to concede defeat yet?


7 posted on 11/21/2006 1:22:42 PM PST by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MplsSteve

This is my personal opinion. The primary between Vern Buchanan and Tramm Hudson was ugly and bruising. Vern won. I suspect there were a number of Republicans who weren't enthusiastic about voting for Vern but no way in hell were they going to vote for Christine Jennings. They voted for no one and now Jennings is trying to claim those non-votes for herself.


8 posted on 11/21/2006 3:45:16 PM PST by sunshine state
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: MplsSteve
Jennings' campaign has been complaining about the voting machine and the large amount of under-votes.

The under-vote in the 2000 election, for the same congressional race, was 2% higher than the under-vote in 2006 that Jennings is whining about.

Hundreds of Dem dirtbags have now come out of the woodwork to claim that they punched the box next to Jennings name but a vote for Buchanan was recorded. They also lamely claim that when they brought this to the attention of election officials they were ignored because the republican controlled county was in the tank for Vern. Typical Dem posturing. If you can't win legitimately, claim fraud and conspiracy and demand a re-vote. This city is becoming too liberal.

9 posted on 11/21/2006 4:31:17 PM PST by Mase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson