Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GarySpFc

Right, Putin's awesome, Russia's great, they've got some sweet human rights there. Litvinenko was randomly poisoned by somebody, Anna Politkovskaya was shot on accident, and the other 14 journalists must have died from "natural causes".


31 posted on 11/22/2006 1:40:07 PM PST by brain bleeds red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: brain bleeds red

I know the difference between cheap propaganda and truth.


33 posted on 11/22/2006 2:42:48 PM PST by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: brain bleeds red
"Right, Putin's awesome, Russia's great, they've got some sweet human rights there. Litvinenko was randomly poisoned by somebody, Anna Politkovskaya was shot on accident, and the other 14 journalists must have died from "natural causes"."

According to Moscow you are 100% correct .... :)

38 posted on 11/22/2006 10:49:35 PM PST by M. Espinola (Freedom is never free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: brain bleeds red; M. Espinola; G8 Diplomat; JasonC; Tailgunner Joe; MarMema

Right, Putin's awesome, Russia's great, they've got some sweet human rights there. Litvinenko was randomly poisoned by somebody, Anna Politkovskaya was shot on accident, and the other 14 journalists must have died from "natural causes".==

You just falling to another extreme. Once you blaim Putin as the murderer of Politkovskaya and the poisoneer of Litvinenko but next just out of your sarcasm you tell that the murder or poisoning didn't happen. It is just the polimic trick.
You just create the implication that if those crimes happened then it was Putin the perpetrator or another choice the crime didn't happen. It is smart trick but not that smart. You are far form mastership of those soviet propagandists of Soviet reign. I in turn was fed by thier production for years (I lived in USSR) so for me it is very easy to recognise the propagandistic fraud and lugh oon it:)).
To conclude I choose the third choice of your dilemma: those crime did happen but it wasn't Putin the perpetrator but the third side who wanted to frame him and undermine him. How about that version?:)
My prove of it is that Putin has no motives to do such crimes. Both Politkovskaya and Litvinenko was juts the neglegible values on the political spectre. Same as for thier master Berezovskii. Everyone knows that they eat form Berezovskii hand. They were his clients. So their credibility wasn't higher then the credibility of Berezovskii himself means something near zero.
But the use them as the scapegots could bring some dividends to him as the political provocation and frame.
But I honestly think that thier efforts are futile. They wasn't damage Putin approval rate whatever they do because Russians do not trust Berezobskii then his clients. But Putin approal rate with Russians is the most important thing isn't it true?


39 posted on 11/23/2006 2:04:06 AM PST by RusIvan ("THINK!" the motto of IBM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson