Posted on 11/22/2006 7:44:30 AM PST by SmithL
I say put the spot light directly on her!!! Let this idiot rant and America will see what she truly is.
Many union contracts use the minimum wage as floor, so if the floor is raised by $2.10 an hour, everything above it goes up also.
From the Republican 45 yard line to the Democrats 48 yard line.
One play does not a mandate make.
Applies to public unions also...increase in the cost of government. This is a tax increase on everyone.
I like your method. We all should call Rangles office everyday for the next two years. Nancy's , Chuckie, Teddy etc. Express your own opinion, just keep it up.
Better get a life preserver. I don't see Bush standing up to them nor do I see him using his veto power. He feels that the people have spoken and this is what they want, so be it. Nor do I see the republicans in the house or senate doing anything other than what they usually do...roll over and play dead.
Congress, being bicameral, includes the Senate. The Churchillian notion of "doing as little as possible" applies to both chambers equally, as well as "thank Lord for it".
Lame Dims trying to voice objections, and Newt steamrollering the Contract With America! Ah, the good old days.
I'd like to raise one finger to her as well.
But it wouldn't be the same finger.
There has to be a vote of the full house to make her speaker.
Imagine if the Republicians could find a few dems. She would be would out of her role.
But every labor union contract has a clause that automatically gives the contract members an equivalent hourly raise. A federal raise in the minimum wage is a gift to the unions.
A perfect example of liberal dialog.
Minimum wage and new ethics rules. That's it? Talk about aiming low.
Which undoubtedly will make prices go up. Is that technically inflaiton? It seems so.
I am a practicing engineer that doesn't pretend to be an economist on the Internet. :)
We don't need all these ugly pictures of the "wicked Witch
of San Francisco"!
Somehow, that line just seems fitting as applied to Democrats. a "sprint of several weeks" to enact the "100-hour agenda".
Kind of like the "million-man march", and the "100,000 cops on the street". Words mean nothing to the left. A "100-hour agenda" should take 100 hours to enact, not "several weeks".
Hey, Nancy! Good luck getting that 100-hour agenda of yours past the Senate and Bush's veto pen.
She doesn't care if they get signed. She just wants to make it look like they are getting things through the House during the 100 WORKING hours (could take weeks or even months). They way that the press has been explaining it some might take that to mean literal 100 hours.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.