Skip to comments.
Carbon nanotubes could make t-shirts bullet proof
Nanowerk ^
| 11/22/06
| Michael Berger
Posted on 11/23/2006 12:05:52 PM PST by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: LibWhacker
This would be totally unnecessary if we had safer bullets.
I'm Jocelyn Elders and I approved this message.
2
posted on
11/23/2006 12:12:16 PM PST
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
To: LibWhacker
Bulletproof underwear, that's the future.
3
posted on
11/23/2006 12:12:58 PM PST
by
353FMG
(I never met a liberal I didn't dislike.)
To: LibWhacker
These type inventions concern me because of their potential to make the 2nd amendment obsolete. Just wait and see what happens when the politicaians think they can screw with the public with no consequences.
4
posted on
11/23/2006 12:15:19 PM PST
by
Ajnin
(I)
To: b_sharp; neutrality; anguish; SeaLion; Fractal Trader; grjr21; bitt; KevinDavis; Momaw Nadon; ...
FutureTechPing! |
An emergent technologies list covering biomedical research, fusion power, nanotech, AI robotics, and other related fields. FReepmail to join or drop. |
|
|
|
5
posted on
11/23/2006 12:15:46 PM PST
by
AntiGuv
("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
To: LibWhacker
To: LibWhacker
So if I understand this correctly, the bullet would push the fabric into the body causing all kinds of damage, but the fabric won't break?
What am I getting wrong here?
7
posted on
11/23/2006 12:26:00 PM PST
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Welcome Home, son! You and your comrades are our heroes!))
To: bnelson44
Could be wrong, but I'm assuming the nanotubes spread out the energy of the impact over the whole shirt.
To: bnelson44
My guess is that a really bad bruise is usually going to be better than a perforation and a large exit wound.
9
posted on
11/23/2006 12:33:13 PM PST
by
NearlyNormal
(Our military wins wars, the liberals and their MSM lose them.)
To: 353FMG
Bulletproof underwear, that's the future.This guy could have used such.
10
posted on
11/23/2006 12:34:48 PM PST
by
sionnsar
(?trad-anglican.faithweb.com?|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: LibWhacker
"Could be wrong, but I'm assuming the nanotubes spread out the energy of the impact over the whole shirt."
I don't think so. As such, even if it could prevent a slug from getting through the material, it would create some massive trauma at the point of impact and hurt like all get out. OTO, you would likely live to fight another day.
11
posted on
11/23/2006 12:40:12 PM PST
by
roaddog727
(BullS##t does not get bridges built)
To: The Spirit Of Allegiance
This is going right into the novel I'm writing. HooYah
To: LibWhacker
Well, the next logical step would be exotic bullets [say, with no spin - aerodynamic stabilization with fins and long boattail, but with a small shaped charge. Impact velocity will be 8000m/sec or better]. Similar game was played by Krupp ages ago. Better armor plate - and then better artillery shell, and then still better armor plate, and again, still better shell... The Kaiser saw it right through, but had to pay from both ends anyway.
13
posted on
11/23/2006 12:48:08 PM PST
by
GSlob
To: bnelson44
So if I understand this correctly, the bullet would push the fabric into the body causing all kinds of damage, but the fabric won't break?Precisely ... the fabric may not allow the projectile to penetrate ... but the material is so thin it will allow the projectile to push the fabric well into the body tissue.
14
posted on
11/23/2006 12:53:23 PM PST
by
BluH2o
To: The Spirit Of Allegiance
I'm Jocelyn Elders and I approved this message. Hi, Jocelyn, still using cornhuskers on your hands?
Really love a story that has might, and could, and maybe. Give the guy a few million and he might, could, may have something.
15
posted on
11/23/2006 1:09:29 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
To: Ajnin
As far as I know, we still can't make transparent objects out of this stuff. So, as we do in games like Halo when the enemy has body armor that you can't get through, go for faceplates.
16
posted on
11/23/2006 1:13:54 PM PST
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Ajnin
Just wait and see what happens when the
politicaians politicians think they can screw with the public with no consequences.
Only if they wear this underwear over their head and face.
17
posted on
11/23/2006 1:14:07 PM PST
by
technomage
(Protest Voters are ignorant, immature, selfish people who have no capacity for long term thinking)
To: bnelson44
Forgive the source, I had to get this from Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silk
Mongols used silk as part of the under-armor garments. Silk is so tough that it was actually used as very light armor, although its special use (the big secret) was to stop arrow penetration into the body. The silk would stop an arrow from penetrating far enough into the body to be lethal; and the arrow could then be pulled out of the wound by tugging on the unbroken silk. The added advantage to this is that there would be no contact between the arrowhead and the interior of the body; thus it reduces the incidence of infected wounds.
There would be perforation with this nanotube armor, but a great deal less trauma than a through and through wound channel.
18
posted on
11/23/2006 1:14:41 PM PST
by
Dr.Zoidberg
(Mohammedism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
To: Andy from Beaverton; LibWhacker
Cool !
I have all the other pieces to my outfit ... cape, tights, belted speedo, boots ...
19
posted on
11/23/2006 1:20:28 PM PST
by
knarf
(Islamists kill each other ... News wall-to-wall, 24/7 .. don't touch that dial.)
To: 353FMG
Bulletproof underwear, that's the future. Being shot in the groin would still be one hell of kick in the balls. All that bullet's energy has to go somewhere. If this happened to you, you might wish you were dead for awhile.
20
posted on
11/23/2006 1:33:15 PM PST
by
Jeff Gordon
(History convinces me that bad government results from too much government. - Thomas Jefferson)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson