Posted on 11/27/2006 12:45:29 PM PST by kiriath_jearim
Visiting Iraqi President Jalal Talabani has called on Iran to provide "comprehensive help" to improve his country's security situation.
Mr Talabani arrived following a two-day delay, caused by a curfew that was imposed after bomb attacks in Baghdad killed more than 200 people.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad told him Iran would do what it could.
The trip is part of a renewed flurry of diplomacy that sees US President George W Bush visiting Jordan this week.
Separately, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan said on Monday that Iraq was close to civil war.
Iranian concern
Mr Talabani was given a red-carpet welcome by Mr Ahmadinejad at Iran's presidential palace.
The Iraqi president said: "We need Iran's comprehensive help to fight terrorism, restore security and stabilise."
Mr Ahmadinejad said: "Any help the government and nation of Iran can give to strengthen security in Iraq will be given. We have no limitation for co-operation in any field."
The BBC's Frances Harrison in Tehran says some have suggested Iran wants to keep the US bogged down in Iraq to prevent it attacking Iran in the future over its nuclear programme.
But she says it seems Iran is increasingly concerned about the uncontrollable level of violence in Iraq.
Mr Ahmadinejad has previously said Iran is willing to help but only if the US changes its approach and abandons what it calls its "bullying" of Iran.
Contacts
Mr Talabani is also meeting Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei during his visit, which is being keenly watched in the West.
Increased contact with Iran and Syria is one of the options being considered by the US Iraq Study Group, which is in its final stages of deliberation on recommending what new policies Washington could adopt on Iraq.
There have been suggestions the US administration is looking for a new approach following heavy mid-term election losses.
Mr Bush is to meet Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Maliki in Jordan this week while Vice-President Dick Cheney has just been in Saudi Arabia.
Mr Annan, meanwhile, has said Iraq is close to civil war.
"I think given the developments on the ground, unless something is done drastically and urgently to arrest the deteriorating situation, we could be there. In fact we are almost there," he said.
Ummm NO. That is the common misperception since the Junk Media doesn't bother to actually learn the facts about the Iraq Study Group. The Iraq Study Group is a Congressional, Not a Presidential, Comission. It was the brain child of John McCain and the chicken hearts who use to run the Republican Congress. It was McCain's pound of political flesh to allow the the 2005 Iraqi Appropriation bill thru the US Senate.
A bit like going to an arsonist to seek help with the city's arson problem...
Iran could help the most by pulling their insurgents out of Iraq and stopping the supply od explosives and other ordnance. I dont know this Talibabi sect of Muslim , but I would guess he is the same sect as the majority of Iranians.
If Ahmedinejhad helps it will be to defeat Iraq and take that country and share it with Syria.
Goint o Ahmadinejhad is like a pig going to a butcher and asking for a pardon.
She went on to say that "pretending to pray five times a day would be worth it for her and her family if that's all that's needed for peace"
Talk about appeasers!
Maybe there really was no plan to win the peace. Only to topple Saddam
When the predominant message from the US is that we are preparing to abandon Iraq(true or not), you've got to expect the Iraqi's to look for another way to survive.
Hmmm.
I'm reading Executive Orders right now. This sort of reminds me of the book...
The fox and the hen house!
The first overtures have been made in a deal with the Devil.
Short term, Moqtada al-Sadr's Mahdi Army gets shut down. Middle term, elements of the Islamic Republic of Iran Army known as the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps takes over "protection" of the Shi'ite regions of Iraq.
Longer term, the Shi'ite provinces are annexed to Iran.
Right before our eyes, we see Iraq getting carved up.
In some bizarro parallel universe, this would be a "win-win".
Yep. I'm starting to think the Study Group Report is really more like a Re-Max for sale sign.
Eventually, her apostasy would be noticed and she would be dragged out to the nearest soccer field and shot through the head (or beheaded with a dull blade, if the local executioner is a traditionalist). These people are swinging the door wide open for an unimaginable evil.
Like asking John Wayne Gacy to babysit.
Talabani is a Kurd. Most Kurds are Sunni (Iranians Shia) but not religious fanatics. They wear their Islam rather lightly.
Exactly
Kerosene, meet Lighter.
In that case asking Ahmadinejhad for help is a big mistake for him.
At first I thought the realist policy would be the right direction to go since the war isn't going well (more like a semi-realist policy). But then the more I read (on the net of course), I think we have to continue to take the unilateral route (we have to eventually realize that the Brits will pull out)--on our terms, not on Iranian or Syrian terms. To put it nicely, Ahmedinejad or Assad aren't interested in doing anything that will benefit the US (spin our heads and get us confused--yes, but benefit us, hell no). Also, I really feel as if we've been fighting this war with one hand tied behind our back so aS NOT TO GET TOO MUCH $H#t from the left wing media.
We have fought every war since WWII with our hands tied behind our backs. Korea we couldnt attack N. Korea's supplies because those lines were the Chinese.
Viet nam. We fought Russia and China in the background while fighting Viet nam on the front again they were being supplied and we couldnt atack those doing the supplying.
The first Desert Storm. We were told to stop befopre we got to saddam and finished him off. Big mistake.
Now this war, where Iran and Syria are stirring the trouble and we cant attack them. When we kicked saddam out we should have headed down the road to Iran the same day.
But, but......one of the alphabet networks has already declared definitively that Iraq is now IN a civil war. This conclusion was stated just like "CBS now definitely calls the state of New York for Al Gore."
All bow down to "The Word".
Also seems Mr. Annan is lagging behind the liberal talking points, ain't he (snicker, ugh, barf).
Leni
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.